Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics

  • Petr HoudekEmail author
Original Research/Scholarship


The development of behavioral ethics has brought forth a detailed understanding of the processes of moral perception, decision-making and behavior within and beyond organizations and communities. However, prescriptive recommendations of behavioral research regarding how to support an ethical environment often underestimate the specifics of organizational characteristics that may encourage the occurrence and persistence of dishonesty, especially regarding deception as a desired action in some instances by some employees and managers. Furthermore, behavioral research does not adequately recognize the notion that dishonesty can be sometimes viewed as an acceptable cost for some expected traits or skills of an employee such as intelligence or creativity. Under some conditions, deception can be even considered a moral, prosocial activity. Finally, formal ethics systems and situational measures to promote honesty may be inefficient or directly harmful. This article highlights questions of how to assess such factors in research on (un)ethical behavior within organizations.


Behavioral ethics Dishonesty Fraud Selection Organizational trade-offs Organizational culture 



  1. Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39–53. Scholar
  2. Ayal, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ariely, D. (2015). Three principles to REVISE People’s unethical behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 738–741. Scholar
  3. Babin, B. J., Boles, J. S., & Darden, W. R. (1995). Salesperson stereotypes, consumer emotions, and their impact on information processing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(2), 94–105. Scholar
  4. Balleisen, E. J. (2017). Fraud: An American history from Barnum to Madoff. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 85–104. Scholar
  6. Bhasin, K. (2011). NYU professor catches 20% of his students cheating, and he’s the one who pays for it. Business Insider. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from
  7. Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). Management practices across firms and countries. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 12–33. Scholar
  8. Bocian, K., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Self-interest bias in moral judgments of others’ actions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 898–909. Scholar
  9. Boles, T. L., Croson, R. T. A., & Murnighan, J. K. (2000). Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 235–259. Scholar
  10. Bolino, M., Long, D., & Turnley, W. (2016). Impression management in organizations: Critical questions, answers, and areas for future research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 377–406. Scholar
  11. Bowman, J. S. (2018). Thinking about thinking: Beyond decision-making rationalism and the emergence of behavioral ethics. Public Integrity, 20(sup1), S89–S105. Scholar
  12. Budd, J. (2013). The Stapel case: An object lesson in research integrity and its lapses. Synesis: A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics, and Policy, 4(1), G47–G53.Google Scholar
  13. Cain, D., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1), 1–25. Scholar
  14. Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 311–324. Scholar
  15. Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 3), 15655–15659. Scholar
  16. Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1), 58–76. Scholar
  17. Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. Scholar
  18. Claessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 554–580. Scholar
  19. Correia, M. M. (2014). Political connections and SEC enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2), 241–262. Scholar
  20. Dimmock, S. G., Gerken, W. C., & Graham, N. P. (2018). Is Fraud Contagious? Coworker Influence on Misconduct by Financial Advisors. The Journal of Finance, 73(3), 1417–1450. Scholar
  21. Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don’t punish. Nature, 452(7185), 348–351. Scholar
  22. Dube, A., Kaplan, E., & Naidu, S. (2011). Coups, corporations, and classified information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1375–1409. Scholar
  23. Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? The Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2213–2253. Scholar
  24. Dyck, I., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2017). How pervasive is corporate fraud? Retrieved November 1, 2017, from:
  25. Edelman, B., & Larkin, I. (2015). Social comparisons and deception across workplace hierarchies: Field and experimental evidence. Organization Science, 26(1), 78–98. Scholar
  26. Egan, M., Matvos, G., & Seru, A. (2019). The market for financial adviser misconduct. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 233–295. Scholar
  27. Erat, S., & Gneezy, U. (2012). White lies. Management Science, 58(4), 723–733. Scholar
  28. Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635. Scholar
  29. Falk, A., & Szech, N. (2016). Pleasures of skill and moral conduct. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5732. Google Scholar
  30. Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102. Scholar
  31. Folger, R., Ganegoda, D. B., Rice, D. B., Taylor, R., & Wo, D. X. (2013). Bounded autonomy and behavioral ethics: Deonance and reactance as competing motives. Human Relations, 66(7), 905–924. Scholar
  32. Frey, B. S. (1993). Does monitoring increase work effort? The rivalry with trust and loyalty. Economic Inquiry, 31(4), 663–670. Scholar
  33. Garrett, J., Hoitash, R., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Trust and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1087–1125. Scholar
  34. Gelfand, S. D. (2016). Using insights from applied moral psychology to promote ethical behavior among engineering students and professional engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1513–1534. Scholar
  35. Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459. Scholar
  36. Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1153–1160. Scholar
  37. Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2010). Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 89–103. Scholar
  38. Gino, F., Shu, L. L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 93–101. Scholar
  39. Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331–2360. Scholar
  40. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. Scholar
  41. Grandoni, D. (2011). NYU professor found that one-fifth of his class plagiarized, The Atlantic. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from:
  42. Grieser, W. D., Kapadia, N., Li, R., & Simonov, A. (2016). Fifty shades of corporate culture. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from
  43. Gunia, B. C., & Levine, E. E. (2016). Deception as competence: The effect of occupation on ethical judgment and behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1).
  44. Healy, M., & Iles, J. (2002). The establishment and enforcement of codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1), 117–124. Scholar
  45. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. Scholar
  46. Hotten, R. (2015). Volkswagen: The scandal explained. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from:
  47. Houdek, P. (2017a). A perspective on research on dishonesty: Limited external validity due to the lack of possibility of self-selection in experimental designs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1566), 1–6. Scholar
  48. Houdek, P. (2017b). Professional identity and dishonest behavior. Society, 54(3), 253–260. Scholar
  49. Houdek, P. (2019). Is behavioral ethics ready for giving business and policy advice? Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(1), 48–56. Scholar
  50. Iñiguez, G., Govezensky, T., Dunbar, R., Kaski, K., & Barrio, R. A. (2014). Effects of deception in social networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1790), 20141195. Scholar
  51. Irlenbusch, B., & Villeval, M. C. (2015). Behavioral ethics: How psychology influenced economics and how economics might inform psychology? Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 87–92. Scholar
  52. Kaptein, M. (2011). Toward effective codes: Testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 233–251. Scholar
  53. Kern, M. C., & Chugh, D. (2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20(3), 378–384. Scholar
  54. Kocher, M. G., Schudy, S., & Spantig, L. (2017). I lie? We lie! Why? Experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups. Management Science.
  55. Koh, J.-B., & Wong, J. S. (2017). Survival of the fittest and the sexiest: Evolutionary origins of adolescent bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(17), 2668–2690. Scholar
  56. Kuběna, A. A., Houdek, P., Lindová, J., Příplatová, L., & Flegr, J. (2014). Justine effect: Punishment of the unduly self-sacrificing cooperative individuals. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e92336. Scholar
  57. Lerman, L. G. (2002). The slippery slope from ambition to greed to dishonesty: Lawyers, money, and professional integrity. Hofstra Law Review, 30(3), 879–921.Google Scholar
  58. Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2014). Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53(Supplement C), 107–117. Scholar
  59. Litten, V., Roberts, L. D., Ladyshewsky, R. K., Castell, E., & Kane, R. (2018). The influence of academic discipline on empathy and psychopathic personality traits in undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 123(Supplement C), 145–150. Scholar
  60. Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.Google Scholar
  61. McCabe, D. L. (1997). Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(4), 433–445. Scholar
  62. McLeod, M. S., Payne, G. T., & Evert, R. E. (2016). Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 429–443. Scholar
  63. Melnikoff, D. E., & Bailey, A. H. (2018). Preferences for moral vs immoral traits in others are conditional. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(4), E592–E600. Scholar
  64. Mironov, M. (2015). Should one hire a corrupt CEO in a corrupt country? Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 29–42. Scholar
  65. Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2015). Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 235–289. Scholar
  66. Palmer, D., & Yenkey, C. B. (2015). Drugs, sweat, and gears: An organizational analysis of performance-enhancing drug use in the 2010 Tour de France. Social Forces, 94(2), 891–922. Scholar
  67. Pascual-Ezama, D., Prelec, D., & Dunfield, D. (2013). Motivation, money, prestige and cheats. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 93, 367–373. Scholar
  68. Pfeffer, J. (2016). Why the assholes are winning: Money trumps all. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 663–669. Scholar
  69. Reuben, E., & Stephenson, M. (2013). Nobody likes a rat: On the willingness to report lies and the consequences there of. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 93(Supplement C), 384–391. Scholar
  70. Rhodes, C. (2016). Democratic business ethics: Volkswagen’s emissions scandal and the disruption of corporate sovereignty. Organization Studies, 37(10), 1501–1518. Scholar
  71. Rosenbaum, S. M., Billinger, S., & Stieglitz, N. (2014). Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 181–196. Scholar
  72. Ruedy, N. E., Moore, C., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2013). The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 531–548. Scholar
  73. Schild, C., Heck, D. W., Ścigała, K. A., & Zettler, I. (2019). Revisiting REVISE: (Re)Testing unique and combined effects of REminding, VIsibility, and SElf-engagement manipulations on cheating behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology.
  74. Sezer, O., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015). Ethical blind spots: Explaining unintentional unethical behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6(Supplement C), 77–81. Scholar
  75. Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 181–190. Scholar
  76. Shalvi, S., Eldar, O., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychological Science, 23(10), 1264–1270. Scholar
  77. Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125–130. Scholar
  78. Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197–15200. Scholar
  79. Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S41–S60. Scholar
  80. Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 601–609. Scholar
  81. Stroebe, W., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 670–688. Scholar
  82. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990. Scholar
  83. Tyler, J. M., Feldman, R. S., & Reichert, A. (2006). The price of deceptive behavior: Disliking and lying to people who lie to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), 69–77. Scholar
  84. Uhlmann, E. L., Zhu, L., & Tannenbaum, D. (2013). When it takes a bad person to do the right thing. Cognition, 126(2), 326–334. Scholar
  85. Vranka, M. A., Becková, A., & Houdek, P. (2017). Is Humblebragging an effective impression management tactic in a job interview?
  86. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552. Scholar
  87. Weisel, O., & Shalvi, S. (2015). The collaborative roots of corruption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(34), 10651–10656. Scholar
  88. Wiltermuth, S. S., Newman, D. T., & Raj, M. (2015). The consequences of dishonesty. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6(Supplement C), 20–24. Scholar
  89. Zhang, T., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2014). Morality rebooted: Exploring simple fixes to our moral bugs. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 63–79. Scholar
  90. Zingales, L. (2015). Presidential address: Does finance benefit society? The Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1327–1363. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Economics in PraguePrague 3, ŽižkovCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations