The aim of this article is to offer a view of the current status of women in medical physics and biomedical engineering, while focusing on solutions towards gender balance and providing examples of current activities carried out at national and international levels. The International Union of Physical and Engineering Scientists in Medicine is committed to advancing women in science and health and has several initiatives overseen by the Women in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Task Group. Some of the main strategies proposed by the Task Group to attain gender balance are: (a) identify and promote female role models that achieve successful work-life balance, (b) establish programs to develop female leaders, (c) create opportunities for females to increase the international visibility within the scientific community, and (d) establish archives and databases of women in STEM.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). (2018). Profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges. https://www.asee.org/. Accessed 3 March 2018.
Arditi, D., Gluch, P., & Holmdahl, M. (2013). Managerial competencies of female and male managers in the Swedish construction industry. Construction Management and Economics,31, 979–990.
Bandura, A. (1986). Prentice-Hall series in social learning theory. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Barysch, K. (2014). Why do so few German mothers go back to work? World Economic Forum 2014. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2014/04/german-women-feel-need-choose-kids-career/. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
Black Girls Code. (2018). http://www.blackgirlscode.com/. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: women ≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly,40, 244–260.
Carr, P. L., Helitzer, D., Freund, K., Westring, A., McGee, R., Campbell, P. B., et al. (2018). A summary report from the research partnership on women in science careers. Journal of General Internal Medicine,1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4547-y.
Chesler, N. C., Barabino, G., Bhatia, S. N., & Richards-Kortum, R. (2010). The pipeline still leaks and more than you think: A status report on gender diversity in biomedical engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering,38, 1928–1935.
Ciência sem Fronteiras (Science without Borders). (2018). http://www.cienciasemfronteiras.gov.br. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles,62, 318–333.
Crowe, S. B., & Kairn, T. (2016). Women in medical physics: A preliminary analysis of workforce and research participation in Australia and New Zealand. Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine,39, 525–532.
Dow, R. (2014). Leadership responsibility in mentoring organization newcomers. Journal of Management Policy and Practice,15(1), 104–112.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review,109, 573–598.
Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today,34(5), 815–820.
Eurodesk. (2018). https://eurodesk.eu/policy-points/erasmus/. Accessed 10 Sept 2018.
European Commission. (1999) Women and science. Mobilising women to enrich European research. Communication from the Commission. COM (99) 76 final. Accessed 17 Feb 1999.
European Commission. (2013). She Figures 2012. Gender in Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
European Commission. (2016). She Figures 2015: Gender in Research and Innovation, European Union, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2777/744106.
European Funding Guide. (2018). http://www.european-funding-guide.eu/articles/financing-tips/requirements-join-erasmus-programme. Accessed 10 Sept 2018.
Gender and Science. (2018). http://genderaveda.cz/en/mentoring-en. Accessed 5 March 2018.
Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A., & Brooks, A. W. (2015). Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.,112, 12354–12359.
Girls in Tech. (2018). http://girlsintech.org/. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Girls Who Code. (2018). https://girlswhocode.com/. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Government of Japan. (2006). Science and Technology Basic Plan (Provisional Translation) (p. 25). http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/. Accessed 7 Oct 2018.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. 2010. https://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2018.
Howe-Walsh, L., Turnbull, S., Papavasileiou, E., & Bozionelos, N. (2016). The influence of motherhood on STEM women academics’ perceptions of organizational support, mentoring and networking. Advancing Women in Leadership,36, 54–63.
Hughes, R. M., Nzekwe, B., & Molyneaux, K. J. (2013). The single sex debate for girls in science: A comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Research in Science Education,43(5), 1979–2007.
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review in Psychology,65, 373–398.
IEEE Uganda Subsection. (2017). IEEE Uganda Subsection WIE leadership summit 2017 Report. http://wie.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IEEE-UGANDA-SUBSECTION-WIE-LEADERSHIP-SUMMIT-2017-REPORT.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Indian Girls Code. (2018). https://www.robotixedu.com/indian-girls-code.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
International Organization for Medical Physics (IOMP). Women subcommittee. (2018). http://www.iomp.org/IOMP-W. Accessed 20 Feb 2018.
Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature,504, 211–213.
Latu, I. M., Mast, M. S., Lammers, J., & Bombari, D. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49, 444–448.
Leaders in Innovation Accelerator (LIA) Malaysia (2018). https://www.innovationleaders.global/. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
Lent, R., Brown, S., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior,45, 79–122.
Lent, R., Brown, S., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology,47, 36–49.
Lhotska, L. (2019). Women in Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics in the Czech Republic. In: Lhotska L., Sukupova L., Lacković I., & Ibbott G. (Eds.), World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering 2018. IFMBE Proceedings, Vol. 68/3. Singapore: Springer.
Likierman, A. (2009). Successful leadership—How would you know? Business Strategy Review,20, 44–49.
Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology (MIGHT). (2018). www.might.org.my Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
Marcu, L., & Marcu, D. (2019). Gender balance in medical physics—Lost in transition? In: Lhotska, L., Sukupova, L., Lacković, I., Ibbott, G. (Eds.), World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering 2018. IFMBE Proceedings, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 737–740. Singapore: Springer.
Meschitti, V., & Smith, H. (2017). Does mentoring make a difference for women academics? Evidence from the literature and a guide for future research. Journal of Research in Gender Studies,7(1), 166–199.
Million Women Mentors. (2018). https://www.millionwomenmentors.com/. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2017). Effective mentoring in STEMM: Practice, research, and future directions. Proceedings of a workshop—in brief. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Institute for Women in Trades, Technology and Science. (2018). https://www.iwitts.org/. Accessed 14 Oct 2018.
Nature. (2008). One woman is still not enough. Nature,451, 865.
Newton-Ungku Omar Fund. (2018). https://www.britishcouncil.my/programmes/newton-ungku-omar-fund. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
Noonan, R. (2017). Women in STEM: 2017 Update. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Office of the Chief Economist. http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/women-in-stem-2017-update.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2019.
O’Bannon, D. J., Garavalia, L., Renz, D. O., & McCarther, S. M. (2010). Successful leadership development for women STEM faculty. Leadership and Management in Engineering,10, 167–173.
Oxentia. (2018). https://www.oxentia.com/. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research Program. (2018). http://sites.nationalacademies.org/pga/peer/index.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
Prime, J. L., Carter, N. M., & Welbourne, T. M. (2009). Women “take care”, men “take charge:” Managers’ stereotypic perception of women and men leaders. The Psychologist-Manager Journal,12, 25–49.
Ramaswami, A., Huang, J., & Dreher, G. (2013). Interaction of gender, mentoring, and power distance on career attainment: A cross-cultural comparison. Human Relations,67, 153–173.
Reinking, A., & Martin, B. (2018). The gender gap in STEM fields: Theories, movements, and ideas to engage girls in STEM. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research,7(2), 148–153.
Royal Academy of Engineering UK. (2018). https://www.raeng.org.uk/. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
Ruderman, M. N., & Ohlott, P. J. (2002). Standing at the crossroads: Next steps for high-achieving women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schoots, B. (2017). Working mothers in the Netherlands: Do they freely choose to work part-time? Report ANR: 360728. The Netherlands 2017. http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=143477. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASoME). (2018). http://www.asme.org/career-education/mentoring. Accessed 5 March 2018.
The Institution of Engineering and Technology. (2018). https://www.theiet.org/. Accessed 5 March 2018.
Tsapaki, V., & Rehani, M. M. (2015). Female medical physicists: The results of a survey carried out by the International Organization for Medical Physics. Physica Medica,31, 368–373.
United Nations. UN Women. (2018). http://www.unwomen.org/en/about-us. Accessed 20 Feb 2018.
United Nations: International Day of Women and Girls in Science. (2019). https://www.womeninscienceday.org/. Accessed 3 Feb 2019.
Workshop: Building the Archives of Women Scientists and Engineers in Canada. (2014). https://inweseri.weebly.com/uploads/3/0/4/1/3041695/workshopreliminary_program_draftjune23.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Yoder, B. (2017). Engineering by the Numbers. Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, USA. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2017.
Yong E. (2017). How women mentors make a difference in engineering. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlanticcom/science/archive/2017/05/women-mentors-engineering/527625/. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
This opinion article does not require ethical approval.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barabino, G., Frize, M., Ibrahim, F. et al. Solutions to Gender Balance in STEM Fields Through Support, Training, Education and Mentoring: Report of the International Women in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Task Group. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 275–292 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00097-0
- Women in health
- Women in science and engineering, leadership