Engineering Ethics Education: A Comparative Study of Japan and Malaysia
This paper reports the findings of a comparative study in which students’ perceived attainment of the objectives of an engineering ethics education and their attitude towards engineering ethics were investigated and compared. The investigation was carried out in Japan and Malaysia, involving 163 and 108 engineering undergraduates respectively. The research method used was based on a survey in which respondents were sent a questionnaire to elicit relevant data. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed on the data. The results of the analyses showed that the attainment of the objectives of engineering ethics education and students’ attitude towards socio-ethical issues in engineering were significantly higher and positive among Japanese engineering students compared to Malaysian engineering students. Such findings suggest that a well-structured, integrated, and innovative pedagogy for teaching ethics will have an impact on the students’ attainment of ethics education objectives and their attitude towards engineering ethics. As such, the research findings serve as a cornerstone to which the current practice of teaching and learning of engineering ethics education can be examined more critically, such that further improvements can be made to the existing curriculum that can help produce engineers that have strong moral and ethical characters.
KeywordsAttainment Attitude Ethics education Engineering students Pedagogy
This study is funded by Sumitomo Foundation, Japan through Japan related Research Project Fiscal Year 2015 (Code: 158451).
- Basart, J. M. (2015). Teaching engineering ethics in the classroom: Issues and challenges. In Contemporary ethical issues in engineering (pp. 144–158). Hersey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Clark, S. (2000). Engineering ethics in Japanese corporations: A view from the field. Engineering Academy of Japan Information, 97, 17–31.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2013). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Hayden, N. J., Rizzo, D. M., Dewoolkar, M. M., Oka, L., & Neumann, M. (2010). Incorporating systems thinking and sustainability within civil and environmental engineering curricula at UVM. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) St. Lawrence section meeting. Rochester, NY: Rochester Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Iino, H. (2005). Introductory and engineering ethics education for engineering students in Japan. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(3), 378–383.Google Scholar
- King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing systems, concepts, process. https://philpapers.org/rec/KINATF. Accessed 1 May 2017.
- Pine, A. (2012). Grave new world. ASEE Prism, 22(3), 35.Google Scholar
- Simonson, M. R., & Maushak, N. (1996). Instructional technology and attitude change. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=fse_facbooks. Accessed 28 April 2017.
- Tochinai, F., & Kanemitsu, H. (2016). Engineering Education at Kanazawa Institute of Technology: To foster engineers who can make ethically and professionally appropriate decisions. In 2016 Regional conference in engineering education.Google Scholar
- Troesch, V. (2015). What is it to be an ethical engineer? A phenomenological approach to engineering ethics pedagogy. Dissertation, Michigan Technological University.Google Scholar
- Zhou, C., Otrel-Cass, K., & Børsen, T. (2015). Integrating ethics into engineering education. In Contemporary ethical issues in engineering (pp. 159–173). Hersey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar