End of 2016: Can We Save Research from Predators in 2017?

Opinion

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9915-1

Cite this article as:
Memon, A.R. Sci Eng Ethics (2017). doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9915-1

Abstract

At the beginning of every year, we expect to see worthwhile improvements on the past. The end of 2016 showcased many important issues in the scientific world, ranging from criticisms of research misconduct and fraud to the introduction of new scientometrics. Despite the scientific community’s continuing efforts, predatory journals and publishers are still on the rise, and the Beall’s list calls attention to the need to take a firm action across the board. This short opinion piece highlights research conducted by the scholarly community on research publication predators during 2016, and offers suggestions as to how to bring about future improvements.

Keywords

Journal Predatory Publishers Research fraud Scientometrics 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation SciencesPeoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for WomenNawabshahPakistan

Personalised recommendations