Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Values in Scientific Work
In this paper we describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a new measure, the values in scientific work (VSW). This scale assesses the level of importance that investigators attach to different VSW. It taps a broad range of intrinsic, extrinsic, and social values that motivate the work of scientists, including values specific to scientific work (e.g., truth and integrity) and more classic work values (e.g., security and prestige) in the context of science. Notably, the values represented in this scale are relevant to scientists regardless of their career stage and research focus. We administered the VSW and a measure of global values to 203 NIH-funded investigators. Exploratory factor analyses suggest the delineation of eight VSW, including autonomy, research ethics, social impact, income, collaboration, innovation and growth, conserving relationships, and job security. These VSW showed predictable and distinct associations with global values. Implications of these findings for work on research integrity and scientific misconduct are discussed.
KeywordsValues Research integrity Research ethics Responsible conduct of research Measurement Values in scientific work
This research was funded in part by the US Office of Research Integrity, ORIIR140009; a National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science Award, 2UL1 TR000448-06, and the National Human Genome Research Institute, K01HG008990.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. E. (1960). A study of values. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333–349.Google Scholar
- Cheng, A., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2010). Developing a meta-inventory of human values. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Edwards, J. R., & Shipp, A. J. (2007). The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 209–258). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2006). Making the right moves—A practical guide to scientific management for postdocs and new faculty (2nd ed.). Chevy Chase, MD: Burroughs Wellcome Fund.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine. (2009). Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Retrieved from Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Kent, M. M. (2011). More US scientists and engineers are foreign-born. Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2011/usforeignbornstem.aspx.
- Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Lyons, S. T., Higgins, C. A., & Duxbury, L. (2010). Work values: Development of a new three-dimensional structure based on confirmatory smallest space analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 969–1002.Google Scholar
- Macrina, F. L. (2014). Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research (4th ed.). Washington, DC: ASM Press.Google Scholar
- National Academies of Science. (2009). On being a scientist. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Institutes of Health. (2009). Update on the requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research NOT-OD-10-019 (Vol. NOT-OD-10-019). Bethesda: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-5/c5h.htm-s4.
- Ostroff, C., & Judge, T. (2007). Perspectives on organizational fit. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Rokeach, M. (1979). From individual to institutional values: With special reference to the values of science. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), Understanding human values: Individual and societal (pp. 47–81). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Hazan, O. (2004). Value pathways to well-being: Healthy values, valued goal attainment, and environmental congruence. In P. A. Lingly & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 68–85). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schneider, B., Kristof, A. L., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1997). What is this thing called fit? In N. R. Anderson & P. Herriott (Eds.), Handbook of selection and appraisal (2nd ed., pp. 393–412). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European social survey (pp. 161–193). Los Angeles, SAGE.Google Scholar
- Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Steneck, N. H. (2007). ORI: Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://ori.dhhs.gov/publications/ori_intro_text.shtml.
- Super, D. E. (1970). Work values inventory: Manual. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Super, D. E. (1995). Values: Their nature, assessment, and practical use. In D. E. Super & B. Sverko (Eds.), Life roles, values, and careers: International findings of the work importance study (pp. 54–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., Witte, H., & Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar