Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 989–1007 | Cite as

Media Portrayal of a Landmark Neuroscience Experiment on Free Will

  • Eric RacineEmail author
  • Valentin Nguyen
  • Victoria Saigle
  • Veljko Dubljevic
Original Paper

Abstract

The concept of free will has been heavily debated in philosophy and the social sciences. Its alleged importance lies in its association with phenomena fundamental to our understandings of self, such as autonomy, freedom, self-control, agency, and moral responsibility. Consequently, when neuroscience research is interpreted as challenging or even invalidating this concept, a number of heated social and ethical debates surface. We undertook a content analysis of media coverage of Libet’s et al.’s (Brain 106(Pt 3):623–642, 1983) landmark study, which is frequently interpreted as posing a serious challenge to the existence of free will. Media descriptions of Libet et al.’s experiment provided limited details about the original study. Overall, many media articles reported that Libet et al.’s experiments undermined the existence of free will, despite acknowledging that several methodological limitations had been identified in the literature. A propensity to attribute greater credibility than warranted to neurobiological explanations could be at stake.

Keywords

Media Free will Libet Neuroscience Ethics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support for this work comes from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Racine), the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé for career awards (Racine) and the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships Programme (Dubljevic). We extend our thanks to members of the Neuroethics Research Unit for feedback on study materials and on previous versions of this manuscript. Special thanks to Simon Rousseau-Lesage and Kaylee Sohng for their editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank members of the Neuroethics Research Unit for their feedback on previous version of this manuscript. Funding for this study came from a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (ER), a Banting fellowship (VD), and a career award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé (ER).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Supplementary material

11948_2016_9845_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

References

  1. Banks, W. P., & Pockett, S. (2007). Benjamin Libet’s work on the neuroscience of free will. In M. Velmans & S. Schneider (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 657–670). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & DeWall, C. N. (2009). Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(2), 260–268. doi: 10.1177/0146167208327217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayne, T. (2011). Libet and the case for free will scepticism. In R. Swinburne (Ed.), Free will and modern science (pp. 25–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourke, V. (1964). Will in western thought. New York: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  5. Cave, S. (2007, March 24). I think therefore I am, I think. London: Financial Times.Google Scholar
  6. Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dilman, I. (1999). Free will: An historical and philosophical introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, K. (2010). Picking our brains: How powerful is the subconscious? New Scientist, 206, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ent, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Embodied free will beliefs: Some effects of physical states on metaphysical opinions. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falk, D. (2003, January 23). Free will may be an illusion: But you must believe in it. National Post.Google Scholar
  11. Farah, M. J., & Hook, C. J. (2013). The seductive allure of “seductive allure”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(1), 88–90. doi: 10.1177/1745691612469035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer, J. M. (1994). The metaphysics of free will: An essay on control. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Frankfurt, H. G. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(1), 5–20. doi: 10.2307/2024717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fried, I., Mukamel, R., & Kreiman, G. (2011). Internally generated preactivation of single neurons in human medial frontal cortex predicts volition. Neuron, 69(3), 548–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1968). Technik und wissenschaft als “ideologie”. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 934–946. doi: 10.1038/Nrn2497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halligan, P., & Oakley, D. (2000). Greatest myth of all. New Scientist, 168, 35.Google Scholar
  19. Halliwell, E. (2009, March 5). A sense of self. Guardian Unlimited.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, S. (2011, December). The free will delusion. New Statesman, 46.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, S. (2012). Free will. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hinrichs, B. (1997). Brain research and folk psychology. The Humanist, 57, 26.Google Scholar
  23. Illes, J., Moser, M. A., McCormick, J. B., Racine, E., Blakeslee, S., Caplan, A., et al. (2010). Neurotalk: Improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kane, R. (1996). The significance of free will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kane, R. (Ed.). (2002). The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford: Oxfords University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Klemm, W. R. (2010). Free will debates: Simple experiments are not so simple. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 6, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krueger, F., Hoffman, M., Walter, H., & Grafman, J. (2014). An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1143–1149. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Libet, B. (1999). Do we have free will? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(8–9), 47–57.Google Scholar
  29. Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106(Pt 3), 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Libet, B., Wright, E. W., Jr., & Gleason, C. A. (1982). Readiness-potentials preceding unrestricted ‘spontaneous’ vs. pre-planned voluntary acts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 54(3), 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynn, M. T., Van Dessel, P., & Brass, M. (2013). The influence of high-level beliefs on self-regulatory engagement: Evidence from thermal pain stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacKenzie, M. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). You didn’t have to do that: Belief in free will promotes gratitude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(11), 1423–1434. doi: 10.1177/0146167214549322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maeda, F., Kleiner-Fishman, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: Specificity of the effect and role of the observer’s orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87(3), 1329–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maye, A., Hsieh, C., Sugihara, G., & Brembs, B. (2007). Order in spontaneous behavior. PLoS One, 2(5), e443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mele, A. (2009). Effective intentions: The power of conscious will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mele, A. R. (2014). Free: Why science hasn’t disproved free will. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mess, H. A. (1943). Chance, free will and the social sciences. Philosophy, 18(71), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Monroe, A. E., Dillon, K. D., & Malle, B. F. (2014). Bringing free will down to earth: People’s psychological concept of free will and its role in moral judgment. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Montague, P. R. (2008). Free will. Current Biology, 18(14), R584–R585. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morse, S. (2006). Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: A diagnostic note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 397–412.Google Scholar
  42. Morse, S. (2007). The non-problem of free will in forensic psychiatry and psychology. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nahmias, E. (2011, November 11). Is neuroscience the death of free will? The New York Times.Google Scholar
  44. Nettler, G. (1959). Cruelty, dignity, and determinism. American Sociological Review, 24(3), 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nettler, G. (1961). Good men, bad men, and the perception of reality. Sociometry, 24(3), 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Overbye, D. (2007, January 2). Free will: Now you have it, now you don’t. The New York Times, F1.Google Scholar
  47. Pereboom, D. (2001). Living without free will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pockett, S., & Miller, A. (2007). The rotating spot method of timing subjective events. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Racine, E., Bar-Ilan, O., & Illes, J. (2005). fMRI in the public eye. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(2), 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Racine, E., Waldman, S., Rosenberg, J., & Illes, J. (2010). Contemporary neuroscience in the media. Social Science and Medicine, 71(4), 725–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Restak, R. (1988, March 27). Your brain has a mind of its own. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  52. Rigoni, D., Kuhn, S., Gaudino, G., Sartori, G., & Brass, M. (2012). Reducing self-control by weakening belief in free will. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1482–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rigoni, D., Kuhn, S., Sartori, G., & Brass, M. (2011). Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: The brain minds whether we believe in free will or not. Psychological Science, 22(5), 613–618. doi: 10.1177/0956797611405680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rigoni, D., Pourtois, G., & Brass, M. (2015). ‘Why should I care?’ Challenging free will attenuates neural reaction to errors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(2), 262–268. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rigoni, D., Wilquin, H., Brass, M., & Burle, B. (2013). When errors do not matter: Weakening belief in intentional control impairs cognitive reaction to errors. Cognition, 127(2), 264–269. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosen, J. (2007, March 11). The brain on the stand. New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  57. Roskies, A. (2006). Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(9), 419–423. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roskies, A. L. (2010). How does neuroscience affect our conception of volition? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33(1), 109–130. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ross, O. (2011, October 2). Whatever happened to man’s free will? The Toronto Star.Google Scholar
  60. Saigle, V., Dubljevic, V., Racine, E. (2015). The impact of a landmark paper on free will: Reconsidering the legacy of the Libet et al. EEG experiment. AJOB Neuroscience, 6(4), 91.Google Scholar
  61. Schurger, A., Sitt, J. D., & Dehaene, S. (2012). An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), E2904–E2913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sentinel, C. S. (2007, May 14). Real veto power. The Christian Science Monitor.Google Scholar
  63. Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., & Haynes, J. D. (2008). Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 11(5), 543–545. doi: 10.1038/nn.2112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spinney, L. (2004, August 12). I’m not guilty: but my brain is. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  65. Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., & Brewer, L. E. (2010). Personal philosophy and personnel achievement: Belief in free will predicts better job performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strawson, G. (2011). Freedom and belief (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tallis, F. (2002, February 10). Science supports Dr Freud. The Sunday Times.Google Scholar
  69. Trevena, J., & Miller, J. (2010). Brain preparation before a voluntary action: Evidence against unconscious movement initiation. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 447–456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Inwagen, P. (1983). An essay on free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Viney, W., Parker-Martin, P., & Dotten, S. (1988). Beliefs in free will and determinism and lack of relation to punishment rational and magnitude. Journal of General Psychology, 115, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Viney, W., Waldman, D., & Barchilon, J. (1982). Attitudes towards punishment in relation to beliefs in free will and determinism. Human Relations, 35, 939–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Addiction and free will. Addiction Research and Theory, 17(3), 231–235. doi: 10.1080/16066350802567103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vohs, K. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(1), 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wasserman, D., & Johnston, J. (2014). Seeing responsibility: Can neuroimaging teach us anything about moral and legal responsibility? Hastings Center Report, 45(2), S37–S49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  77. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Racine
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Valentin Nguyen
    • 1
  • Victoria Saigle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Veljko Dubljevic
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Neuroethics Research UnitInstitut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM)MontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Experimental MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventative MedicineUniversité de MontrealMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Department of Neurology and NeurosurgeryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations