Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 681–700 | Cite as

Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting

  • Jan GogollEmail author
  • Julian F. Müller
Original Paper


The recent progress in the development of autonomous cars has seen ethical questions come to the forefront. In particular, life and death decisions regarding the behavior of self-driving cars in trolley dilemma situations are attracting widespread interest in the recent debate. In this essay we want to ask whether we should implement a mandatory ethics setting (MES) for the whole of society or, whether every driver should have the choice to select his own personal ethics setting (PES). While the consensus view seems to be that people would not be willing to use an automated car that might sacrifice themselves in a dilemma situation, we will defend the somewhat contra-intuitive claim that this would be nevertheless in their best interest. The reason is, simply put, that a PES regime would most likely result in a prisoner’s dilemma.


Autonomous driving Automation Ethics Morality Dilemma 


  1. Becker, J., Colas, M. A., Nordbruch, S., Fausten, M. (2014). Bosch’s vision and roadmap toward fully autonomous driving. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation (pp. 49–59). Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Blanco, M., Atwood, J., Russell, S., Trimble, T., McClafferty, J., & Perez, M. (2016). Automated vehicle crash rate comparison using naturalistic data. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Bonnefon, J., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I. (2015). Autonomous vehicles need experimental ethics: Are we ready for utilitarian cars? CoRR, arXiv:1510.03346. Accessed February 2016.
  4. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Indianapolis: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coelingh, E., & Solyom, S. (2012). All aboard the robotic train. Ieee Spectrum 49.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, A. (2015). Google’s Plan to eliminate human driving in 5 years. Wired. Accessed February 2016.
  7. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1999). The ties that bind: A social contract approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fagnant, D., & Kockelman, K. (2013). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles. Eno Center of Transportation. Accessed February 2016.
  9. Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect in virtues and vices. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.Google Scholar
  10. Gao, P., Hensley, R., & Zielke, A. (2014). A road map to the future for the auto industry. McKinsey Quarterly, Oct.Google Scholar
  11. Gaus, G. (2005). Should philosophers ‘apply ethics’? Think, 3(09), 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodall, N. (2013). Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2424, 58–65.Google Scholar
  13. Goodall, N. (2014). Machine ethics and automated vehicles. In Road vehicle automation (pp. 93–102). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, M. (2015). Documents confirm Apple is building self-driving car. The Guardian. Accessed February 2016.
  15. Hevelke, A., & Nida-Rümelin, J. (2014). Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: An ethical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hof, R. (2015). Tesla’s Elon Musk thinks cars you can actually drive will be outlawed eventually. Forbes.\-you-can-actually-drive-may-be-outlawed/. Accessed February 2016.
  17. Hongo, J. (2015). RoboCab: Driverless taxi experiment to start in Japan. Wall Street Journal. Accessed February 2016.
  18. Huebner, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2011). Moral judgments about altruistic self-sacrifice: When philosophical and folk intuitions clash. Philosophical Psychology, 24(1), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IEEE. (2012). This lane is my lane, that lane is your lane. Accessed February 2016.
  20. Kumfer, W., & Burgess, R. (2015). Investigation into the role of rational ethics in crashes of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2489, 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, P. (2013). The ethics of autonomous cars, The Atlantic. Accessed February 2016.
  22. Lin, P. (2014a). What if your autonomous car keeps routing you past Krispy Kreme? The Atlantic. Accessed February 2016.
  23. Lin, P. (2014b). Here’s a terrible idea: Robot cars with adjustable ethics settings. WIRED. Accessed February 2016.
  24. Marcus, G. (2012). Moral machines. The New Yorker Blogs. Accessed February 2016.
  25. Marshall, S., & Niles, J. (2014). Synergies between vehicle automation, telematics connectivity, and electric propulsion. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Mchuch, M. (2015). Tesla’s cars now drive themselves, Kinda. WIRED. Accessed February 2016.
  27. Meyer, G., Dokic, J., & Müller, B. (2015). Elements of a European roadmap on smart systems for automated driving. In Gereon Meyer und Sven Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation 2 (pp. 153–159). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Millar, J. (2014a). Proxy prudence: Rethinking models of responsibility for semi-autonomous robots. Available at SSRN 2442273.Google Scholar
  29. Millar, J. (2014b). An ethical dilemma: When robot cars must kill, who should pick the victim? Accessed February 2016.
  30. Millar, J. (2014c). You should have a say in your robot car’s code of ethics. WIRED. Accessed April 2016.
  31. Mladenovic, M. N., & McPherson, T. (2015). Engineering social justice into traffic control for self-driving vehicles? Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9690-9.
  32. Murgia, M. (2015). First driverless pods to travel public roads arrive in the Netherlands. The Telegraph. Accessed February 2016.
  33. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013). Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Accessed February 2016.
  34. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity (pp. 258–270). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Powers, T. M. (2006). Prospects for a Kantian machine. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powers, T. M. (2013). Prospects for a Smithian machine. In: Proceedings of the international association for computing and philosophy, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  37. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Robinson, J. (2014). Would you kill the fat man? Teaching Philosophy, 37, 449–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sandberg, A., & Bradshaw, H. G. (2013). Autonomous vehicles, moral agency and moral proxyhood. In Beyond AI conference proceedings. Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Schrank, D., Lomax, T., Eisele, B. (2011). TTIs 2011 urban mobility report, Texas Transportation Institute. Accessed February 2016.
  41. Shanker, R., Jonas, A., Devitt, S., Humphrey, A., Flannery, S., Greene, W., et al. (2013). Autonomous cars: Self-driving the new auto industry paradigm. Morgan Stanley Blue Paper, November.Google Scholar
  42. Silberg, G., Wallace, R., Matuszak, G., Plessers, J., Brower, C., & Subramanian, D. (2012). Self-driving cars: The next revolution (pp. 10–15). KPMG and Center for Automotive Research.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, B. W. (2014). A legal perspective on three misconceptions in vehicle automation. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation (pp. 85–91). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spieser, K., Ballantyne, K., Treleaven, R., Frazzoli, E., Morton, D., & Pavone, M. (2014). Toward a systematic approach to the design and evaluation of automated mobility-on-demand systems: A case study in Singapore. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59(2), 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomson, J. J. (1985). Double effect, triple effect and the trolley problem: Squaring the circle in looping cases. Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Torbert, R., & Herrschaft, B. (2013). Driving Miss Hazy: Will driverless cars decrease fossil fuel consumption? Rocky Mountain Institute. Accessed February 2016.
  48. World Health Organisation. (2011). Road traffic deaths: Data by country. WHO. Accessed February 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.University of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations