Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 625–627 | Cite as

Multiple First Authors as Equal Contributors: Is It Ethical?

Letter

References

  1. Conte, M. L., Maat, S. L., & Omary, M. B. (2013). Increased co-first authorships in biomedical and clinical publications: A call for recognition. FASEB Journal, 27(10), 3902–3904. doi:10.1096/fj.13-235630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C. F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787–796. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(7), 579–585. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Smith, R. (1997). Authorship: Time for a paradigm shift? British Medical Journal, 314(7086), 992. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7086.992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. van Wesel, M. (2016). Evaluation by citation: Trends in publication behavior, evaluation criteria, and the strive for high impact publications. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 199–225. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9638-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sengamala Thayaar Educational Trust Women’s CollegeSundarakkottai, MannargudiIndia
  2. 2.College of Pharmacy and Health CareTajen UniversityYanpuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations