Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 591–622 | Cite as

Engineers’ Responsibilities for Global Electronic Waste: Exploring Engineering Student Writing Through a Care Ethics Lens

  • Ryan C. Campbell
  • Denise Wilson
Original Paper
  • 621 Downloads

Abstract

This paper provides an empirically informed perspective on the notion of responsibility using an ethical framework that has received little attention in the engineering-related literature to date: ethics of care. In this work, we ground conceptual explorations of engineering responsibility in empirical findings from engineering student’s writing on the human health and environmental impacts of “backyard” electronic waste recycling/disposal. Our findings, from a purposefully diverse sample of engineering students in an introductory electrical engineering course, indicate that most of these engineers of tomorrow associated engineers with responsibility for the electronic waste (e-waste) problem in some way. However, a number of responses suggested attempts to deflect responsibility away from engineers towards, for example, the government or the companies for whom engineers work. Still other students associated both engineers and non-engineers with responsibility, demonstrating the distributed/collective nature of responsibility that will be required to achieve a solution to the global problem of excessive e-waste. Building upon one element of a framework for care ethics adopted from the wider literature, these empirical findings are used to facilitate a preliminary, conceptual exploration of care-ethical responsibility within the context of engineering and e-waste recycling/disposal. The objective of this exploration is to provide a first step toward understanding how care-ethical responsibility applies to engineering. We also hope to seed dialogue within the engineering community about its ethical responsibilities on the issue. We conclude the paper with a discussion of its implications for engineering education and engineering ethics that suggests changes for educational policy and the practice of engineering.

Keywords

Ethics of care Feminist ethics Electronic waste Electronics recycling Engineering education Engineering ethics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Ken Yasuhara at the University of Washington Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT) for his invaluable feedback and encouragement throughout the development of this manuscript. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0909817. Partial support for this research came from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research infrastructure grant, R24 HD042828, to the Center for Studies in Demography & Ecology at the University of Washington.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Allendoerfer, C., Wilson, D., Bates, R., Crawford, J., Jones, D., Floyd-Smith, T., et al. (2012). Strategic pathways for success: The influence of outside community on academic engagement. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 512–538. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00060.x.
  2. Campbell, R. C. (2013). How can engineering students learn to care? How can engineering faculty teach to care? In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering education for social justice: Critical explorations and opportunities (Vol. 10, pp. 111–131). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_6.
  3. Campbell, R. C., Yasuhara, K., & Wilson, D. (2012). Care ethics in engineering education: Undergraduate student perceptions of responsibility. In Proceeding of the 42nd Annual Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference (pp. 1–6). Seattle, WA, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Inc. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462370.
  4. Campbell, R. C., Yasuhara, K., & Wilson, D. (2015). Ethics in engineering students’ design considerations: Case studies of electric power systems for the “developing world.” In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference (pp. 1–18). Seattle, WA, USA: American Society for Engineering Education. doi: 10.18260/p.24024.
  5. Carnegie Foundation. (2010). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Retrieved March 23, 2016 from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/.
  6. de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. doi: 10.1177/0306312710380301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eshleman, A. (2014). Moral responsibility. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014). Retrieved March 23, 2016 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/moral-responsibility/.
  8. Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankfurt, H. G. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 66(23), 829–839. doi: 10.2307/2023833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G.-J., & van de Poel, I. (2013). Philosophy of Technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2013). Retrieved March 23, 2016 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/technology/.
  11. Friedman, B. (1996). Value-sensitive design. Interactions, 3(6), 16–23. doi: 10.1145/242485.242493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gilligan, C. (1995). Moral orientation and moral development. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics (pp. 31–46). Boulder, CO: Westview Press Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Hamington, M., & Sander-Staudt, M. (Eds.). (2011). Applying care ethics to business (Vol. 34). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Held, V. (2007). The ethics of care. In D. Copp, The Oxford handbook of ethical theory (pp. 537–567). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Retrieved March 23, 2016 from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195325911-e-20.
  17. Kardon, J. B. (2005). Concept of “care” in engineering. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 19(3), 256–260. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:3(256).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilgore, D., Atman, C. J., Yasuhara, K., Barker, T. J., & Morozov, A. (2007a). Considering context: A study of first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 321–334. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00942.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kilgore, D., Chachra, D., Loshbaugh, H., McCain, J., Jones, M., & Yasuhara, K. (2007b). Creative, contextual, and engaged: Are women the engineers of 2020? In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. Honolulu, HI, USA: American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/2324.
  20. Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality and dependency. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press. Retrieved March 23, 2016 from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/258.
  22. Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2007). The problem of knowledge in incorporating humanitarian ethics in engineering education: Barriers and opportunities. In Proceeding of the Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference (pp. 24–29). Milwaukee, WI, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Inc. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2006.322645.
  23. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1984).Google Scholar
  24. Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 205–212. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00436.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Payne, G., & Williams, M. (2005). Generalization in qualitative research. Sociology, 39(2), 295–314. doi: 10.1177/0038038505050540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pesch, U. (2015). Engineers and active responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(4), 925–939. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9571-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pickren, G. (2014). Political ecologies of electronic waste: Uncertainty and legitimacy in the governance of e-waste geographies. Environment and Planning A, 46(1), 26–45. doi: 10.1068/a45728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Riley, D. (2013). Hidden in plain view: Feminists doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 189–206. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9320-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roeser, S. (2012). Emotional engineers: Toward morally responsible design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 103–115. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9236-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneider, J., Lucena, J., & Leydens, J. A. (2009). Engineering to help. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28(4), 42–48. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2009.935008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sepúlveda, A., Schluep, M., Renaud, F. G., Streicher, M., Kuehr, R., Hageluken, C., et al. (2010). A review of the environmental fate and effects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronic equipments during recycling: Examples from China and India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sunderland, M. E. (2014). Taking emotion seriously: Meeting students where they are. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 183–195. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9427-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407–433. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vandersteen, J., Baillie, C., & Hall, K. (2009). International humanitarian engineering. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28(4), 32–41. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2009.934998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, M. (2000). Interpretivism and generalisation. Sociology, 34(2), 209–224. doi: 10.1177/S0038038500000146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson, D., Allendoerfer, C., Campbell, R. C., Burpee, E., & Kim, M. J. (2013). When engineering students write about waste electronics: Trends in how they think of global impacts. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference (pp. 1–17). Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/22754.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Individual Ph.D. Program, Interdisciplinary Programs, The Graduate SchoolUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations