Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 227–241 | Cite as

Bribery and Its Ethical Implications for Aid Workers in the Developing World

  • J. Scott RemerEmail author
Original Paper


Bribery is a complicated, multi-dimensional issue. Upon first glance, most westerners would immediately condemn it as an underhanded, unfair means of gaining an advantage in a competitive or legal situation, and so it is in virtually every case in the westernized world. However, the issue becomes much more complicated in the international context, particularly in developing nations, where giving and accepting bribes is often normal and expected. This paper serves to inform ethical decision-making in situations where the “right choice” is unclear with regards to bribery, primarily for individuals performing aid work in foreign countries with corrupt officials and police officers. In such contexts, a simple offering of food, money, or a small trinket may make the difference between a person being able to accomplish meaningful, life-changing work for the local populace or having that work significantly slowed at best and being thrown out of the country, robbed, or imprisoned in worse cases. The larger scale bribery issues in international business and the laws pertaining to them are also discussed.


Bribery Foreign aid Engineering ethics Developing world 



Many thanks to the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science and the Jefferson Scholars Foundation for the fellowships funding the author’s research. Thanks also to Garrick Louis for his guidance in developing this paper and the thought processes behind it.


  1. Carson, T. (1992). Bribery. In L. C. Becker & C. Becker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ethics (p. 98). New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  2. English Standard Version Bible. London: Crossway, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Gaskill, D. (2006). Kantian ethics. In Philosophy courses by Dan Gaskill. California State University Sacramento. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  4. Helmer, E., & Deming, S. (Summer 2011). Non-Governmental Organizations: Anticorruption compliance challenges and risks. International lawyer. Ipswich, MA: Academic Search Complete. Accessed February 15, 2013.
  5. Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Merriam-Webster. (2013). Corruption. Accesses April 11, 2013.
  7. Mohr, A. (2012). The biggest bribe cases in business history. Investopedia. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  8. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). (2007). Code of ethics for engineers. Accessed 11 April 2013.
  9. Pritchard, M. S. (1998). Bribery: The concept. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Public Broadcasting Service. (2003). Durant’s Big Scam. In American experience: TV’s most-watched history series. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  11. Rothbard, M. N. (1986). The ethics of bribery. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Strom, S. (2012). Web sites shine light on petty bribery worldwide. The New York Times Accessed 9 Jan 2016.
  13. The Economist. (1999). A global war against bribery. US History In Context (p. 22). Accessed February 24, 2013.Google Scholar
  14. Transparency International. (2012). Fighting foreign bribery: Prosecutions making it harder for companies. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  15. Turow, S. (1985). What’s wrong with bribery. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(4), 249–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. United States Department of Justice. (2011). Department of Justice: JGC Corporation Resolves Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Investigation and Agrees to Pay a $218.8 Million Criminal Penalty. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  17. US Department of Justice (US DOJ). (2012). A resource guide to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: By the Criminal Division of the US Department of Justice and the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission. Accessed February 26, 2013.
  18. UK Ministry of Justice. (2010). The Bribery Act of 2010: Quick start guide. Accessed February 27, 2013.
  19. Vesilind, P. A., & Gunn, A. S. (2011). Hold paramount: The engineer’s responsibility to society (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations