Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1285–1297 | Cite as

The Risks of Revolution: Ethical Dilemmas in 3D Printing from a US Perspective

  • Erica L. Neely
Original Paper

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has spread widely over the past decade, especially with the availability of home 3D printers. In the future, many items may be manufactured at home, which raises two ethical issues. First, there are questions of safety. Our current safety regulations depend on centralized manufacturing assumptions; they will be difficult to enforce on this new model of manufacturing. Using current US law as an example, I argue that consumers are not capable of fully assessing all relevant risks and thus continue to require protection; any regulation will likely apply to plans, however, not physical objects. Second, there are intellectual property issues. In combination with a 3D scanner, it is now possible to scan items and print copies; many items are not protected from this by current intellectual property laws. I argue that these laws are ethically sufficient. Patent exists to protect what is innovative; the rest is properly not protected. Intellectual property rests on the notion of creativity, but what counts as creative changes with the rise of new technologies.

Keywords

3D printing Additive manufacturing (AM) Ethics of technology Intellectual property Safety 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A version of this paper was presented at the CEPE/ETHICOMP 2014 meeting in Paris, France. I am grateful for the helpful comments received by people present at that presentation, as well as the peer reviewers and editor of this journal. My thanks also to Clif Flynt, Rebecca Newman, and Bill Roper for answering certain questions on engineering practice.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical impact statements

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Banks, J. (2013). Adding value in additive manufacturing. IEEE Pulse, 4, 22–26. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2013.2279617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman, B. (2012). 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business Horizons, 55, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, S., Bowyer, A., & Haufe, P. (2010). The intellectual property implications of low-cost 3D printing. SCRIPTed, 7(1), 5–31.Google Scholar
  4. Castro, B. (2013). Should government regulate illicit uses of 3D printing?. Washington, D.C.: The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Consumer Product Safety Act. (1972). Pub. L. No. 92-573 §2, 86 Stat. 1207.Google Scholar
  6. Fischer, S. (2013). The body printed. IEEE Pulse, 4(6), 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, I. D. (2012). Additive manufacturing: A transformational advanced manufacturing technology. Advanced Materials and Processes, 170, 25–29.Google Scholar
  8. Huang, S. H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A., & Hou, L. (2013). Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: A literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, 1191–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen-Haxel, P. (2012). 3D printers, obsolete firearm supply controls, and the right to build self-defense weapons under Heller. Golden Gate University Law Review, 42, 447–496.Google Scholar
  10. Mattox, J. M. (2013). Additive manufacturing and its implications for military ethics. Journal of Military Ethics, 12, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mertz, L. (2013). New world of 3-D printing offers ‘completely new ways of thinking’. IEEE Pulse, 4(6), 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nowak, P. (2013). The promise and peril of 3D printing (pp. 16–17). Toronto: Corporate Knights.Google Scholar
  13. Petrick, I. J., & Simpson, T. W. (2013). 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Research Technology Management, 56(6), 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raths, D. (2014). Does 3D printing change everything? Government Technology, 27(1), 20–24.Google Scholar
  15. Stemp-Morlock, G. (2010). Personal fabrication. Communications of the ACM, 53(10), 14–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thilmany, J. (2012). Printed life. Mechanical Engineering, 134(1), 44–47.Google Scholar
  17. Weinberg, M. (2010). It will be awesome if they don’t screw it up: 3D printing, intellectual property, and the fight over the next great disruptive technology. Washington, D.C.: Public Knowledge. http://www.publicknowledge.org/files/docs/3DPrintingPaperPublicKnowledge.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionOhio Northern UniversityAdaUSA

Personalised recommendations