Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Institutional Conflicts of Interest in Academic Research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Financial relationships in academic research can create institutional conflicts of interest (COIs) because the financial interests of the institution or institutional officials may inappropriately influence decision-making. Strategies for dealing with institutional COIs include establishing institutional COI committees that involve the board of trustees in conflict review and management, developing policies that shield institutional decisions from inappropriate influences, and establishing private foundations that are independent of the institution to own stock and intellectual property and to provide capital to start-up companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of American Medical Colleges. (2002). Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II: Principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution’s financial interests in human subjects research. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Medical Colleges, Association of American Universities. (2008). Protecting patients, preserving integrity, advancing health: Accelerating the implementation of COI policies in human subjects research. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Governing Boards of Colleges and Universities. (2009). AGB Board of Directors’ statement on conflict of interest. http://agb.org/news/2009-12/agb-board-directors-statement-conflict-interest. Accessed 7 Aug 2015.

  • Cooper, R. J., Gupta, M., Wilkes, M. S., & Hoffman, J. R. (2006). Conflict of interest disclosure policies and practices in peer-reviewed biomedical journals. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(12), 1248–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke University. (2009). Institutional conflict of interest policy. http://duke.edu/services/ethicscompliance/coi/icoi_policy.php. Accessed 7 Aug 2015.

  • Fain, P., Bartlett, T., & Beja, M. (2010). Divided loyalties. The chronicleof higher education, March 4, 2010. http://chronicle.com/article/Divided-Loyalties-Conflicts/64629. Accessed 7 Aug 2015.

  • Friedberg, M., Saffran, B., Stinson, T., Nelson, W., & Bennett, C. (1999). Evaluation of conflict of interest in new drugs use in oncology. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(15), 1453–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (2009). Committee on conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. In B. Lo & M. J. Field (Eds.), Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S. (2007). When conflict-of-interest is a factor in scientific misconduct. Medical Law, 26, 447–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexchin, J. (2012). Those who have the gold make the evidence: How the pharmaceutical industry biases the outcomes of clinical trials of medications. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lexchin, J., Bero, L. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003). Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 326(7400), 1167–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt is their product. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, H., & Martin, B. (2001). Academic relationships with industry: A new model for biomedical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(7), 933–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health. (2013). Financial conflict of interest. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coi/. Accessed 7 Aug 2015.

  • National Science Foundation. (2005). Conflict of interest policies. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf08_1/aag_4.jsp. Accessed 7 Aug 2015.

  • Public Health Service. (2011). Objectivity in research. 42 Code of Federal Regulations 50.601.

  • Resnik, D. B. (2007). The price of truth: How money affects the norms of science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (2008). COI issues in research misconduct investigations and inquiries. ORI Newsletter, 16(4), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (2011). Scientific research and the public trust. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B., Ariansen J. L., Jamal, J., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). Institutional conflict of interest policies of U.S. academic institutions. Academic Medicine (in press).

  • Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. S. (2002). Conflicts of interest and the university. Accountability in Research, 9(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridker, P. M., & Torres, J. (2006). Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000–2005. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(19), 2270–2274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, S. (2004). Scientific misconduct and its cover-up: Diary of a whistleblower. Boca Raton, FL: Brown Walker Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2015). Responsible conduct of research (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, S. (2008). Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 29(2), 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2006). Research misconduct: Poisoning the well. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(5), 232–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelfox, H., Chua, G., O’Rourke, K., & Detsky, A. (1998). Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium channel antagonists. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(2), 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (2009). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Policy on institutional conflict of interest. http://www.unc.edu/campus/policies/institutional_policy.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2013.

  • Wadman, M. (2011). Report prods NIH to address institutional conflicts of interest. Nature News Blog, January 12, 2011. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/01/report_prods_nih_to_address_in.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2013.

  • Washington University. (2009). Washington University Policy on institutional conflict of interest. http://universitycompliance.wustl.edu/conflictofinterest/Documents/ICOI%20Policy.pdf. Accessed 7 Aug 2015.

  • Wolverton, B. (2012). Penn State’s culture of reverence led to ‘total disregard’ for children’s safety. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 12, 2012. http://chronicle.com/article/Penn-States-Culture-of/132853/. Accessed 7 Aug 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is the work product of an employee or group of employees of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). However, the statements, opinions or conclusions contained therein do not necessarily represent the statements, opinions or conclusions of the NIEHS, NIH, or the United States government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Resnik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Resnik, D.B. Institutional Conflicts of Interest in Academic Research. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 1661–1669 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9702-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9702-9

Keywords

Navigation