Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1131–1149 | Cite as

Engineering Social Justice into Traffic Control for Self-Driving Vehicles?

Original Paper


The convergence of computing, sensing, and communication technology will soon permit large-scale deployment of self-driving vehicles. This will in turn permit a radical transformation of traffic control technology. This paper makes a case for the importance of addressing questions of social justice in this transformation, and sketches a preliminary framework for doing so. We explain how new forms of traffic control technology have potential implications for several dimensions of social justice, including safety, sustainability, privacy, efficiency, and equal access. Our central focus is on efficiency and equal access as desiderata for traffic control design. We explain the limitations of conventional traffic control in meeting these desiderata, and sketch a preliminary vision for a next-generation traffic control tailored to address better the demands of social justice. One component of this vision is cooperative, hierarchically distributed self-organization among vehicles. Another component of this vision is a priority system enabling selection of priority levels by the user for each vehicle trip in the network, based on the supporting structure of non-monetary credits.


Traffic management Self-driving vehicle Engineering ethics Transportation ethics Priority level Credit system 


  1. A History of Traffic Control Devices (1980). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers.Google Scholar
  2. Abbas, M., & Mladenovic, M. N. (2013). Agent-based control for adaptive high performance connected vehicle streams. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Connected Vehicles, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  3. Agyeman, J. (2008). Toward a ‘just’ sustainability? Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 22(6), 751–756. doi: 10.1080/10304310802452487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agyeman, J., & Evans, B. (2004). ‘Just sustainability’: The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 155–164. doi: 10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00117.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander, J. M. (2008). Capabilities and social justice: The political philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. M., Nidhi, K., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Azath, M., Wahida Banu, R., & Neela Madheswari, A. (2011). Improving fairness in network traffic by controlling congestion and unresponsive flows. Advances in network security and applications, (Vol. 196, pp. 356–363). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Barry, B. (1997). Sustainability and intergenerational justice. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 89, 43–64.Google Scholar
  9. Barton, R. (2015). Automotive trends 2015 changing lanes: Understanding consumer attitudes and future trends in the UK motoring industry. Future thinking.
  10. Beamon, B. M. (2005). Environmental and sustainability ethics in supply chain management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. London, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Bianchini, D., & Avila, I. (2014). Smart cities and their smart decisions: Ethical considerations. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 33(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blyth, P., Mladenovic, M. N., Nardi, B., Ekbia, H., & Su, N. (2015). Driving the self-driving vehicle: Expanding the technological design Horizon. Paper presented at the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  14. Borgmann, A. (1987). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Caney, S. (2014). Climate change, intergenerational equity and the social discount rate. Politics Philosophy and Economics,. doi: 10.1177/1470594X14542566.Google Scholar
  16. Canons of Ethics for Members (2003). Institute of Transportation Engineers.Google Scholar
  17. Cao, L., Thakali, L., Fu, L., & Donaher, G. (2013). Effect of weather and road surface conditions on traffic speed of rural highways. In Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. Google Scholar
  18. Code of Ethics (2010). American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  19. Code of Ethics for Engineers (2007). National Society of Professional Engineers.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, G. A. (2011). On the currency of egalitarian justice, and other essays in political philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen, S., & Grace, D. (1994). Engineers and social responsibility: An obligation to do good. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 13(3), 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Creative Disruption: Exploring Innovation in Transportation (2013). Intelligent Transportation Society America: Leadership Circle.Google Scholar
  23. Curiel-Esparza, J., Canto-Perello, J., & Calvo, M. A. (2004). Establishing sustainable strategies in urban underground engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(3), 523–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Daganzo, C. F. (1997). Fundamentals of transportation and traffic operations. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Wolf, T., & Holvoet, T. (2004). Emergence and Self-Organisation: A statement of similarities and differences. Engineering Self-Organising Systems, 3464, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Delot, T., Cenerario, N., & Ilarri, S. (2010). Vehicular event sharing with a mobile peer-to-peer architecture. Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies, 18(4), 584–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dobson, A. (1999). Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Epting, S. (2015). The moral dimensions of infrastructure. Science and Engineering Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9663-z.Google Scholar
  29. Fagnant, D., & Kockelman, K. (2013). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Eno Center for Transportation. October.
  30. Flanagan, M., Howe, D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. Information technology and moral philosophy, pp. 322–353.Google Scholar
  31. Friedewald, M., Wright, D., Gutwirth, S., & Mordini, E. (2010). Privacy, data protection and emerging sciences and technologies: Towards a common framework. Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(1), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gartner, N., & Stamatiadis, C. (2009). Traffic networks, optimization and control of Urban. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 1–10). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Godsmark, P., Kirk, B., Gill, V., & Flemming, B. (2015). Automated vehicles: The coming of the next disruptive technology. The Conference Board of Canada’s Centre for Transportation and Infrastructure, The Van Horne Institute, and The Canadian Automated Vehicles Centre of Excellence.Google Scholar
  34. Goodin, R. E. (1995). Utilitarianism as a public philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grant-Muller, S., & Xu, M. (2014). The role of tradable credit schemes in road traffic congestion management. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 34(2), 128–149. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.880754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grodzinsky, F. S. (2000). Equity of access: Adaptive technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(2), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hartenstein, H., Laberteaux, K., & Ebrary, I. (2010). VANET: Vehicular applications and inter-networking technologies: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  38. Harvey, D. (2010). Social justice and the city (Vol. 1). Atlanta: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  39. Heidegger, M. (2009). The question concerning technology. In C. Hanks (Ed.), Technology and values: Essential readings (pp. 99–113). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Heikkerö, T. (2012). Ethics in technology: A philosophical study. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  41. Heikkilä, S. (2014). Mobility as a service: A proposal for action for the public administration. Case Helsinki: Aalto University.Google Scholar
  42. Hevelke, A., & Nida-Rümelin, J. (2014). Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 619–630.Google Scholar
  43. Heylighen, F. (2001). The science of self-organization and adaptivity. The Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, 5(3), 253–280.Google Scholar
  44. Hickman, R., & Banister, D. (2014). Transport, Climate Change and the City (Routledge Advances in Climate Change Research). New York, NY, USA: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Hsu, R. C., & Chen, L. (2005). An integrated embedded system architecture for in-vehicle telematics and infotainment system. In (Vol. 4, pp. 1409–1414): IEEE.Google Scholar
  46. IEEE Code of Ethics (2006). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  47. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth (Vol. 560). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, D. G., & Wetmore, J. M. (2009). Technology and society building our sociotechnical future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kamin, C., & Morton, D. A financial analysis of different scenarios for using autonomous vehicles to deliver packages. In Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, 2015. Google Scholar
  50. Karagiannis, G., Altintas, O., Ekici, E., Heijenk, G., Jarupan, B., Lin, K., et al. (2011). Vehicular networking: A survey and tutorial on requirements, architectures, challenges, standards and solutions. Communications Surveys and Tutorials, IEEE, 13(4), 584–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaufmann, S. (1993). The origins of order. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kleijnen, J. (2011). Ethical issues in engineering models: an operations researcher’s reflections. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leen, G., & Heffernan, D. (2002). Expanding automotive electronic systems. Computer, 35(1), 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levinson, D. (2010). Equity effects of road pricing: A review. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 33–57. doi: 10.1080/01441640903189304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lutin, J. M., Kornhauser, A. L., & Lerner-Lam, E. (2013). The revolutionary development of self-driving vehicles and implications for the transportation engineering profession. ITE Journal, 83(7), 28–32.Google Scholar
  56. Maile, M., Neale, V., Ahmed-Zaid, F., Basnyake, C., Caminiti, L., Doerzaph, Z., et al. (2008). Cooperative intersection collision avoidance system limited to stop sign and traffic signal violations (CICAS-V).Google Scholar
  57. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2009). Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  58. Marsden, G., Kimble, M., Nellthorp, J., & Kelly, C. (2010). Sustainability assessment: The definition deficit. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4(4), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McShane, C. (1999). The origins and globalization of traffic control signals. Journal of Urban History, 25(3), 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Meyer, L. (2009). Intergenerational justice. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.Google Scholar
  61. Misener, J. A., Dickey, S., VanderWerf, J., & Sengupta, R. (2009). Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperation. In S. Olariu & M. A. C. Weigle (Eds.), Vehicular networks: From theory to practice (Vol. 20). London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  62. Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Mladenovic, M. N. (2012). Large scale analysis of traffic control systems. Traffic Engineering and Control, 53(1).Google Scholar
  64. Mladenovic, M. N., & Abbas, M. (2012). A guide to effective adaptive traffic control systems. Traffic Engineering and Control, 53(2).Google Scholar
  65. Mladenovic, M. N., & Abbas, M. (2013a). A Paradigm shift in traffic control of self-driving vehicles: Improving mobility and accessibility within a framework of social justice. Paper presented at the Conference on Agent-Based Modeling in Transportation Planning and Operations Blacksburg, VA,Google Scholar
  66. Mladenovic, M. N., & Abbas, M. (2013b). Self-organizing control framework for driverless vehicles. In 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Delft, Netherlands. Google Scholar
  67. Mladenovic, M. N., & Abbas, M. (2013c). Socially sustainable control framework for self-driving vehicles. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Connected Vehicles Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  68. Mladenovic, M. N., & Abbas, M. (2014). Priority-based intersection control framework for self-driving vehicles: Agent-based model development and evaluation. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Connected Vehicles Vienna, Austria,Google Scholar
  69. Mladenovic, M. N., & Abbas, M. (2015a). Anthropocentric development of intersection control principles for self-driving vehicles under considerations of social justice. Paper presented at the mobil.TUM 2015: International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport Munich, Germany,Google Scholar
  70. Mladenovic, M. N., & Abbas, M. (2015b). Evaluation of priority-based traffic control framework for self-driving vehicles under considerations of social justice. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,Google Scholar
  71. Mladenovic, M. N., Abbas, M., & McPherson, T. (2014) Development of socially sustainable traffic-control principles for self-driving vehicles: The ethics of anthropocentric design. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering (pp. 1–8). Chicago, IL: IEEE.Google Scholar
  72. Mobility 2001: World mobility at the end of the 20th century: Overview (2001). World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  73. Mueller, E. A. (1970). Aspects of the history of traffic signals. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 19(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  75. Nussbaum, M. C. (2009). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Özgüner, Ü., Acarman, T., & Redmill, K. (2011). Autonomous ground vehicle. Norwood, MA: Artech House.Google Scholar
  77. Papageorgiou, M., Diakaki, C., Dinopoulou, V., Kotsialos, A., & Wang, Y. (2003). Review of road traffic control strategies. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(12), 2043–2067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pfeifer, R., & Verschure, P. Distributed adaptive control: A paradigm for designing autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life, 1992 (pp. 21-30).Google Scholar
  79. Pojman, L. P. (2006). Justice: An anthology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  80. Portugali, J. (2000). Self-organization and the city. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Prehofer, C., & Bettstetter, C. (2005). Self-organization in communication networks: Principles and design paradigms. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 43(7), 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles (2013). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
  83. Prigogine, I., & Nicolis, G. (1977). Self organization in non-equilibrium systems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  84. Ramírez, F., & Seco, A. (2011). Civil engineering at the crossroads in the twenty-first century. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 681–687.Google Scholar
  85. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing the Paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2015). Potential impact of self-driving vehicles on household vehicle demand and usage. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.Google Scholar
  89. Seeley, T. D. (2002). When is self-organization used in biological systems? The Biological Bulletin, 202(3), 314–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Self-driving cars: The next revolution (2013). KPMG LLP, Center for Automotive Research.Google Scholar
  91. Shladover, S. E. (2012). Recent international activity in cooperative vehicle–highway automation systems. office of corporate research, technology, and innovation management, Federal Highway Administration.Google Scholar
  92. Smith, J., Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2014). The responsibilities of engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(2), 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Spieser, K., Treleaven, K., Zhang, R., Frazzoli, E., Morton, D., & Pavone, M. (2014). Toward a systematic approach to the design and evaluation of automated mobility-on-demand systems: A case study in Singapore. In Road Vehicle Automation (pp. 229–245): Springer.Google Scholar
  94. Standard J3016 (2014). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Society of Automotive Engineers.Google Scholar
  95. Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. The Safety Promise and Challenge of Automotive Electronics: Insights from Unintended Acceleration (2012). (Vol. 308): National Research Council, Committee on Electronic Vehicle Controls and Unintended Acceleration, Transportation Research Board, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board.Google Scholar
  97. Traffic Safety Facts: 2012 Data (2014). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
  98. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). United Nations General Assembly.Google Scholar
  99. Unsal, C., & Bay, J. S. Spatial self-organization in large populations of mobile robots. In Intelligent Control, 1994., Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Symposium on, 1994 (pp. 249–254): IEEE.Google Scholar
  100. Van de Poel, I. (2013). Translating values into design requirements. In Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 253–266): Springer.Google Scholar
  101. Van de Poel, I. (2015). Design for values in engineering. In J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design (pp. 667–690). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Van den Hoven, J., Lokhorst, G.-J., & Van de Poel, I. (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Van Vuren, T., & Smart, M. B. (1990). Route guidance and road pricing—problems, practicalities and possibilities. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 269–283. doi: 10.1080/01441649008716759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Materializing morality design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(3), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Weil, V. (1984). The rise of engineering ethics. Technology in Society, 6(4), 341–345. doi: 10.1016/0160-791X(84)90028-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Weil, V. (2002). Engineering ethics. In R. E. Spier (Ed.), Science and technology ethics. Google Scholar
  107. Welch, B. (2010). Beautiful and Abundant: Building the World We Want B&A Books.Google Scholar
  108. Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wright, D., Finn, R., Gellert, R., Gutwirth, S., Schütz, P., Friedewald, M., et al. (2014). Ethical dilemma scenarios and emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAalto UniversityEspooFinland
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations