Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA,
Berezin, A. A. (2001). Discouragement of innovation by overcompetitive research funding. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,
Drazen, J. M., et al. (2010). Toward more uniform conflict disclosures—the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. New England Journal of Medicine,
Gallo, S. A., Carpenter, A. S., & Glisson, S. R. (2013). Teleconference versus face-to-face scientific peer review of grant application: Effects on review outcomes. PLoS One,
Langfeldt, L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Research Evaluation,
Lee, C. J., et al. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
Lo, B., & Field, M. J. (2009). Institute of Medicine. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
National Institutes of Health. (2014). Managing Conflict of Interest in NIH Peer Review of Grants and Contracts. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/peer_coi.htm. Accessed 17 October 2014.
Oleinik, A. (2014). Conflict (s) of interest in peer review: Its origins and possible solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics,
Pham-Kanter, G. (2014). Revisiting financial conflicts of interest in FDA advisory committees. The Milbank Quarterly,
Rockey, S. J., & Collins, F. S. (2010). Managing financial conflict of interest in biomedical research. JAMA. 303(23), 2400–2402.
Wood, F., & Wessely, S. (2003). Peer review of grant applications: A systematic review. In Jefferson Godlee (Ed.), Peer review in health sciences (pp. 14–31). London: BMJ Publications.