Skip to main content

A Framework to Move Forward on the Path to Eco-innovation in the Construction Industry: Implications to Improve Firms' Sustainable Orientation

Science and Engineering Ethics volume 21, pages 1469–1484 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper examines key aspects in the innovative behavior of the construction firms that determine their environmental orientation while innovating. Structural equation modeling was used and data of 222 firms retrieved from the Spanish Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC) for 2010 to analyse the drivers of environmental orientation of the construction firms during the innovation process. The results show that the environmental orientation is positively affected by the product and process orientation of construction firms during the innovation process. Furthermore, the positive relation between the importance of market information sources and environmental orientation, mediated by process and product orientation, is discussed. Finally, a model that explains these relations is proposed and validated. Results have important managerial implications for those companies worried about their eco-innovative focus as the types of actions and relations within firms most suitable for improving their eco-innovative orientation are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two- step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, G. K. I. (2004). Competing revaluing construction paradigms in practice. Rotterdam: CIB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audet, R., & Guyonnaud, M. F. (2013). Transition in practice and action in research. A French case study in piloting eco-innovations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 398–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least square (PLS) approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. (2007). Revaluing construction: A holistic model. Building Research and Information, 35(3), 268–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P., & Lee, A. (2005). Revaluing construction: A CIB priority theme, Salford Centre for Research and Innovation. Salford/CIB: University of Salford, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (2005). Environmental and sustainability ethics in supply chain management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burciu, A., Bostan, I., Condrea, P., & Grosu, V. (2010). Financing the environmental policies in the communitarian space. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 9(9), 1179–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrascosa-López, C., Peiró-Signes, Á., & Segura-García-del-Río, B. (2012). Does it pay to be greener than legislation? An empirical study of spanish tile industry. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(5), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T., & Fowler, L. (2008). Establishing green roof infrastructure through environmental policy instruments. Environmental Management, 42(1), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervelló-Royo, R., Garrido-Yserte, R., & Segura-García del Río, B. (2012). An urban regeneration model in heritage areas in search of sustainable urban development and internal cohesion. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–358). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modelling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission, European. (2004). Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment Brussels. Brussels: European Comission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2006). Action Plan for Energy Efficiency: Realising the Potential, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/action_plan_energy_efficiency/doc/com_2006_0545_en.pdf. (Accessed 31/01/2014).

  • Courtney, R., & Winch, G. (2002). CIB strategy for re-engineering construction. Rotterdam: CIB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, R., & Winch, G. M. (2003). Re-engineering construction: The role of research and implementation. Building Research and Information, 31(2), 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2001). The professional approach to engineering ethics: Five research questions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction. The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, C., & Cole, R. J. (2011). Motivating change: Shifting the paradigm. Building Research and Information, 39(5), 436–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2006). Green to gold, how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Brussels.

  • Falk, R., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer on soft modelling. Akron: The University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 328–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gázquez-Abad, J. C., Huertas-García, R., Vázquez-Gómez, M. D., & Romeo, A. C. (2014). Drivers of sustainability strategies in Spain’s wine tourism industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 1938965514549657.

  • Gebauer, H., Gustafsson, A., & Witell, L. (2011). Competitive advantage through service differentiation by manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1270–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, S. (1975). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito, O., & González-Benito, J. (2008). Implications of market orientation on the environmental transformation of industrial firms. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 752–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least square path modelling in international marketing. In I. Rudolf, R. Sinkovics & N. Pervez (Eds.), Advance in international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319).

  • Hill, S., & Lorenz, D. (2011). Rethinking professionalism: Guardianship of land and resources. Building Research and Information, 39(3), 314–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huedo, P., & Lopez-Mesa, B. (2013). Review of tools to assist in the selection of sustainable building assemblies. Informes de la Construcción, 65(529), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007a). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. summary for policymakers: Contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.

  • IPCC. (2007b). Mitigation. contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.

  • Jensen, J. S., Gottlieb, S. C., & Thuese, C. L. (2011). Construction sector development: Frames and governance responses. Building Research and Information, 39(6), 665–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibert, Ch J. (2007). The next generation of sustainable construction. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 595–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Brodhag, C., & Mebratu, D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility driven innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(2), 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. (2001). Commentary on: The greening of engineers: A cross-cultural experience. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(1), 123–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P. T., Chan, E. H., Chau, C. K., Poon, C. S., & Chun, K. P. (2011). Environmental management system vs green specifications: How do they complement each other in the construction industry? Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 788–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister, S., Leimeister, J. M., & Knebel, U. (2009). A cross-national comparison of perceived strategic importance of RFID for CIOs in Germany and Italy. International Journal of Information Management, 29(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of green buildings? Building Research and Information, 35(6), 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefferink, D., & Andersen, M. S. (1998). Strategies of the green member states in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 254–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losada, B. (2013). Smart cities through the smart grid: The sustainable smart city and its energy dependence. DYNA, 88(2), 154–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetzkendorf, T. (2010). Sustainable properties-dream or trend? Informes de la Construcción, 61(517), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lützkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. (2007). Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation. Building Research and Information, 35(6), 644–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthyssensa, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2008). Moving from basic offerings to value-added solutions: Strategies, barriers and alignment. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 316–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeiver, C., & Gadenne, D. (2005). Environmental management systems in small and medium business. Small Business Journal, 23(5), 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. México: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsa, H. G., Segarra-Oña, M., Jang, S. S., Chen, R., & Singh, A. J. (2014). Special issue on sustainable and eco-innovative practices in hospitality and tourism. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 5–5.

  • Pearce, D. (2006). Is the construction sector sustainable? Building Research and Information, 34(3), 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiró-Signes, A., Miret-Pastor, L. L., Segarra-Oña, M. V., & De Miguel Molina, B. (2013). Analysing the determinants of better performance through eco management tools at the food industry: An empirical study. In P. Golinska (Ed.), Eco Production and logistics (pp. 73–90). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peiró-Signes, A., Verma, R., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., & Vargas-Vargas, M. (2014). The impact of environmental certification on hotel guest ratings. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petruzzelli, A. M., Dangelico, R. M., Rotolo, D., & Albino, V. (2011). Organizational factors and technological features in the development of green innovations: Evidence from patent analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(3), 291–310.

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

  • Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2002). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffman, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the eu environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3. http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Sánchez-Ollero, J. L., García-Pozo, A., & Marchante-Mera, A. (2013). How does respect for the environment affect final prices in the hospitality sector? A hedonic pricing approach. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy change and discourse in Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segarra-Oña, M.D.V., M.Peiró-Signes, Á., Verma, R., & Miret-Pastor, L. (2012). Does environmental certification help the economic performance of hotels? Evidence from the spanish hotel industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 1938965512446417.

  • Segarra-Oña, M. V., Peiró-Signes, A., Albors-Garrigós, J., & Miret-Pastor, P. (2011). Impact of innovative practices in environmentally focused firms: Moderating factors. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5(2), 425–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segarra-Oña, M. D. V., Peiró-Signes, A., & Mondéjar-Jiménez, J. (2013). Identifying variables affecting the proactive environmental orientation of firms: An empirical study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22(3), 873–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Thomas, D., & Konsynski, B. (2008). Strategic and institutional perspectives in the evaluation, adoption and early integration of radio frequency identification (RFID): An empirical investigation of current and potential adopters. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii international conference on system science, Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, USA (pp 407–420).

  • Sigala, M. (2014). Customer involvement in sustainable supply chain management a research framework and implications in tourism. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Peng, J., Liu, W., & An, Q. (2014). A PSBM model for environmental efficiency evaluation and its application. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23(3), 893–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 111–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. W., & Wakefield, K. L. (2000). Eco-orientation: An extension of market orientation in an environmental context. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(3), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V., Chatelin, J., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, R. Y. (2001). The implementation of EMS in construction firms: Case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. (2006). Sustainability auditing and assessment challenges. Building Research and Information, 34(3), 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, E., & De Jong, J. J. (2007). Establishing sustainability: Policy successes and failures. Building Research and Information, 35(5), 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanasupa, L., Chen, K. C., & Slivovsky, L. (2006). Global challenges as inspiration: A classroom strategy to foster social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vastag, G., Kerekes, S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1996). Evaluation of corporate environmental management approaches: A framework and application. International Journal of Production Economics, 43(2–3), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry for its support through the research project (EC02011-27369) and also the Universitat Politècnica de València (SP20140647).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Management Department, 7D Building, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain

    María-del-Val Segarra-Oña & Angel Peiró-Signes

  2. Social Sciences Department, Business School, 7J Building, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain

    Roberto Cervelló-Royo

Authors
  1. María-del-Val Segarra-Oña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angel Peiró-Signes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roberto Cervelló-Royo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María-del-Val Segarra-Oña.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Segarra-Oña, MdV., Peiró-Signes, A. & Cervelló-Royo, R. A Framework to Move Forward on the Path to Eco-innovation in the Construction Industry: Implications to Improve Firms' Sustainable Orientation. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 1469–1484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9620-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9620-2

Keywords

  • Eco-innovation
  • Environmental orientation
  • Sustainability
  • Construction industry
  • Structural equation modelling