Skip to main content

The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof

Abstract

The goal of most scientific research published in peer-review journals is to discover and report the truth. However, the research record includes tongue-in-cheek papers written in the conventional form and style of a research paper. Although these papers were intended to be taken ironically, bibliographic database searches show that many have been subsequently cited as valid research, some in prestigious journals. We attempt to understand why so many readers cited such ironic science seriously. We draw from the literature on error propagation in research publication for ways categorize citations. We adopt the concept of irony from the fields of literary and rhetorical criticism to detect, characterize, and analyze the interpretations in the more than 60 published research papers that cite an instance of ironic science. We find a variety of interpretations: some citing authors interpret the research as valid and accept it, some contradict or reject it, and some acknowledge its ironic nature. We conclude that publishing ironic science in a research journal can lead to the same troubles posed by retracted research, and we recommend relevant changes to publication guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averbeck, J. (2010). Irony and language expectancy theory: Evaluations of expectancy violation outcomes. Communication Studies, 61(3), 356–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, L. B. (2006). Primer on integrative oncology. Hematology-Oncology Clinics of North America, 20(1), 213–222. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2006.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, W. C. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownnutt, M. J. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Hope should never be squashed by being told that things cannot happen. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadge, W. (2012). Possibilities and limits of medical science: Debates over double-blind clinical trials of intercessory prayer. Zygon, 47(1), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2011). The power of observation. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 66(2), 71–75. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00963.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coruh, B. A., Ayele, H., Pugh, M., & Mulligan, T. (2005). Does religious activity improve health outcomes? A critical review of the recent literature. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 1(3), 186–191. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Rosa, M. I., Silva, F. R., Silva, B. R., Costa, L. C., Bergamo, A. M., Silva, N. C., … & Azevedo, R. (2013). A randomized clinical trial on the effects of remote intercessory prayer in the adverse outcomes of pregnancies. Cienc. Saude Coletiva, 18(8), 2379–2384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Saussure, L., & Schulz, P. (2009). Subjectivity out of irony. Semiotica, 173(1), 397–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossey, L. (2011). CAM, religion, and Schrodinger’s one mind. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 7(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2010.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1239–1256. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gammack, J. K., & Morley, J. E. (2004). Anti-aging medicine-the good, the bad, and the ugly. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 20(2), 157. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2004.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomini, M. (2009). Theory-Based Medicine and the Role of Evidence: why the emperor needs new clothes, again. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard, S. B. (2014). On whimsy, jokes, and beauty: can scientific writing be enjoyed? Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettiaratchy, S., & Hemsley, C. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Paper proves power of statistics, not prayer. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, V. K. Y. (2011). Medicine, Methodology, And Values: trade-offs in clinical science and practice. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 54(2), 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, D. R. (2007). A systematic review of the empirical literature on intercessory prayer. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 174–187. doi:10.1177/1049731506296170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—”You cannae break the laws of physics, captain”. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howick, J. (2011). Exposing the vanities-and a qualified defense-of mechanistic reasoning in health care decision making. Philosophy of Science, 78(5), 926–940. doi:10.1086/662561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunink, M. G. M. (2004). Does evidence based medicine do more good than harm? British Medical Journal, 329(7473), 1051. doi:10.1136/BMJ.329.7473.1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S., & Capel, L. M. (1966). The concept of irony: With constant reference to socrates. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompanje, E. J. O. (2013). ‘Real men wear kilts’. The anecdotal evidence that wearing a Scottish kilt has influence on reproductive potential: how much is true? Scottish Medical Journal, 58(1), e1–e5. doi:10.1177/0036933012474600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, P. J. (2009). God: The failed hypothesis. how science shows that god does not exist. American Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 272–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagnado, M. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Competing interests on religious conviction or spirituality may be important. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. Y., & Newberg, A. B. (2005). Religion and health: A review and critical analysis. Zygon, 40(2), 443–468. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00674.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibovici, L. (2001). Effects of remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients with bloodstream infection: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 323(7327), 1450–1451. doi:10.1136/BMJ.323.7327.1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibovici, L. (2002). Letters. BMJ, 324, 1038–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesniak, K. T. (2006). The effect of intercessory prayer on wound healing in nonhuman primates. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 12(6), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranise, A. M. J. (2013). Superstition and religious ritual: An examination of their effects and utilization in sport. Sport Psychologist, 27(1), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. C. (2003). Such stuff as dreams are made on: Mediator-directed therapy in sepsis. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2(5), 391–405. doi:10.1038/nrd1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, K. S., Spielmans, G. I., & Goodson, J. T. (2006). Are there demonstrable effects of distant intercessory prayer? A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1), 21–26. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3201_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M., & Gilbert, G. N. (1982). Joking apart: Some recommendations concerning the analysis of scientific culture. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 585–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, C. (2006). Re: “exposure to loud noise and risk of acoustic neuroma”. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164(7), 706. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmun, W. E., & Naugler, C. (1998). The impact of hissy fits in primary care. The Canadian Medical Association Journal, 159(12), 1457–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. F., Katerndahl, D., & Morgan-Kidd, J. (2004). A randomized trial of the effects of remote intercessory prayer: Interactions with personal beliefs on problem-specific outcomes and functional status. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10(3), 438–448. doi:10.1089/1075553041323803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. (2000). In Citing Chaos A Study of the Rhetorical Use of Citations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(2), 185–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. (2008). The remote prayer delusion: Clinical trials that attempt to detect supernatural intervention are as futile as they are unethical. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(9), e18. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.023432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prayer. (2014). New World Encyclopedia. Accessed April 21, 2014. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Prayer#cite_ref-7

  • Price, C. I. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—All randomised controlled trials require informed consent. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radin, D., Stone, J., Levine, E., Eskandarnejad, S., Schlitz, M., Kozak, L., & Hayssen, G. (2008). Compassionate intention as a therapeutic intervention by partners of cancer patients: Effects of distant intention on the patients’ autonomic nervous system. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 4(4), 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2008.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahtu, T. (2011). Irony and (in)coherence: Interpreting irony using reader responses to texts. Text & Talk, 31(3), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, B. K., Yarandi, H. N., & Merz, J. F. (2008). Empirical developments in retraction. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(11), 807–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L., Ahmed, I., Hall, S., & Davison, A. (2009). Intercessory prayer for the alleviation of ill health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000368.pub3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggla, G., & Fortunat, S. (2003). Is there enough rationale in randomised controlled trials on distant healing? Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 115(15–16), 607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. A. (2010a). Nonlocality and exceptional experiences: A study of genius, religious epiphany, and the psychic. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 6(4), 227–236. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2010.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. A. (2010b). Trends that will affect your future … the denier movements critique evolution, climate change, and nonlocal consciousness. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 6(3), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Secor, M., & Walsh, L. (2004). A rhetorical perspective on the sokal hoax: Genre, style, and context. Written Communication, 21(1), 69–91. doi:10.1177/0741088303261037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V., & Minhas, R. (2012). Explanatory models are needed to integrate RCT and observational data with the patient’s unique biology. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105(1), 11–24. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2011.110236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., & Pell, J. (2003). Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 327(7429), 1459–1461. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the medical literature: How many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(11), 688–692.

  • Steinman, K. J., & Bambakidis, A. (2008). Faith-health collaboration in the united states: Results from a nationally representative study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 22(4), 256–263. doi:10.4278/061212152R.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. C., Adams, M. P., Stewart, J. A., & Nelson, L. A. (2013). Review of clinical medicine and religious practice. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(1), 91–106. doi:10.1007/s10943-012-9578-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, M., & Resnik, D. (1995). The effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornett, A. M. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Cautious approach is needed. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7344.1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonelli, M. R. (2012). Compellingness: Assessing the practical relevance of clinical research results. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(5), 962–967. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01901.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trilla, A., Aymerich, M., Lacy, A. M., & Bertran, M. J. (2006). Phenotypic differences between male physicians, surgeons, and film stars: Comparative study. BMJ, 333(7582), 1291–1293. doi:10.1136/BMJ.39015.672373.80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D. D. (2006). Just another drug? A philosophical assessment of randomised controlled studies on intercessory prayer. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(8), 487–490. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos, A. F. (2010). The effects of prayer on organizational life: A phenomenological study. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(3), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, H. (2002). Divine intervention. Lancet, 360(9349), 1990. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11906-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wager, E., & Williams, P. (2011). Why and how do journals retract articles? an analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 567–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wander, P. C. (1976). The Rhetoric of Science. Western Speech Communication, 40(4), 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, N. J., & Nesti, M. (2005). The role of spirituality in sport psychology consulting: An analysis and integrative review of literature. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(3), 228–239. doi:10.1080/10413200591010102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. K., & Beardsley, M. C. (1946). The Intentional Fallacy. Sewanee Review, 54, 468–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston. (2012). This ‘Christian doctor’ was lucky not to be struck off. The Guardian, June 18, 2012, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2012/jun/18/christian-doctor-lucky-not-struck-off

  • Witcombe, B., & Meyer, D. (2006). Sword swallowing and its side effects. British Medical Journal, 333(7582), 1285–1287. doi:10.1136/bmj.39027.676690.55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1983). Irony in the social study of science. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives in the social study of science (pp. 239–266). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J. (2011). Causality in medicine: Getting back to the hill top. Preventive Medicine, 53(4–5), 235–238. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngster, I., Berkovitch, M., Kozer, E., Lazarovitch, Z., Berkovitch, S., & Goldman, M. (2009). Can religious icons be vectors of infectious diseases in hospital settings? American Journal of Infection Control, 37(10), 861–863. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Souder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ronagh, M., Souder, L. The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 1537–1549 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9619-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9619-8

Keywords

  • Irony
  • Retraction
  • Research publication
  • Transparency
  • Error propagation