Perceptions of Plagiarism by STEM Graduate Students: A Case Study
- First Online:
Issues of academic integrity, specifically knowledge of, perceptions and attitudes toward plagiarism, are well documented in post-secondary settings using case studies for specific courses, recording discourse with focus groups, analyzing cross-cultural education philosophies, and reviewing the current literature. In this paper, the authors examine the perceptions of graduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines at the University of Florida regarding misconduct and integrity issues. Results revealed students’ perceptions of the definition and seriousness of potential academic misconduct, knowledge of institutional procedures, and views on faculty actions, all with a focus on divergences between US and internationally-educated students. The open-ended questions provide anecdotal evidence to highlight personal experiences, positive and negative, aimed at the faculty, international students and undergraduates. Combined, these findings outline an important part of the campus academic integrity culture at a major American university. Recommendations for local actions also are discussed.
KeywordsPlagiarism STEM Honor codes Research misconduct Academic integrity Graduate students
- Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal components analysis. Menlo Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- East, J. (2006). The problem of plagiarism in academic culture. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2(2), 16–28.Google Scholar
- Gibson, N. S., & Chester-Fangman, C. (2010). The librarian’s role in combating plagiarism. Reference Services Review, 39(1), 132–150.Google Scholar
- Handa, N., & Power, C. (2005). Land and discover! A case study investigating the cultural context of plagiarism. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2(3), 64–84.Google Scholar
- Klein, D. (2011). Why learners choose plagiarism: A review of literature. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 97–110.Google Scholar
- Leonard, M., & Bennett, D. B. (2013). Responsible Conduct of Research Training, SPEC Kit 336. Washington DC: Association of Research Libraries.Google Scholar
- Leonard, M., Buhler, A., Johnson, M., Levey, D., & Oliverio, J. (2010). Gaming Against Plagiarism (GAP) Development Proposal. National Science Foundation, Grant No. EESE IIS 1033002.Google Scholar
- Love, P. G., & Simmons, J. (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal, 32(4), 539–550.Google Scholar
- McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1), 2/16/2010.Google Scholar
- McCabe, D.L. (2011) Academic Integrity and Graduate Students. Presentation at the University of Florida Ethics Symposium 2011. Gainesville, Fl. http://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00003925/00001.
- Park, S., Mardis, L. A., & Ury, C. J. (2010). I’ve lost my identity—oh, there it is…in a style manual: Teaching citation styles and academic honesty. Reference Services Quarterly, 39(1), 42–57.Google Scholar
- Roig, M. (2006). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. http://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/plagiarism.pdf.
- Ryan, G., Bonanno, H., Krass, I., Scouller, K., & Smith, L. (2009). Undergraduate and Postgraduate Pharmacy Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism and Academic Honesty. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(6), 1–8.Google Scholar
- University of Florida (2011). AITF: Academic Integrity Task Force Report. Retrieved from http://fora.aa.ufl.edu.
- University of Florida. Dean of Students Office. (2008). Student conduct & honor code [includes Honor Pledge at beginning of full Code.] Retrieved from http://www.dso.ufl.edu/sccr/process/student-conduct-honor-code/.