Beecher, H. K. (1966). Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine,
Belmont Report. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects in research. Washington, DC. Retrieved December 8, 2014, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html.
Bledsoe, C. H., Sherin, B., Galinsky, A. G., Headley, N. M., Heimer, C. A., Kjeldgaard, E., et al. (2007). Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern University Law Review,
Blumenbach, J. F. (1787; rpt. 1817) Elements of physiology. Trans. John Elliotson. 2nd ed. Philadelphia. [Original work published as Institutiones Physiologicae 1787].
Caplan, A. L. (Ed.). (1992). When medicine went mad: Bioethics and the holocaust. Totowa: Humana Press.
Chaplin, S. (2008). Nature dissected, or dissection naturalized? The case of John Hunter’s museum. Museum and Society, 6(2), 135–151.
Davies, H. (2004). Can Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein be read as an early research ethics text? Medical Humanities,
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (2009). Protection of human subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 CFR46.
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (2011). Human subjects research protections: Enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. Federal Register, 76(143), 44512–44530.
Emanuel, E. J. (2011). Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects. The New England Journal of Medicine,
Engelstein, S. (2008). Anxious anatomy: The conception of the human form in literary and naturalist discourse. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Fost, N., & Levine, R. J. (2007). The dysregulation of human subjects research. JAMA,
Gigante, D. (2009). Life: Organic form and romanticism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Grady, C. (2010). Do IRBs protect human research participants? JAMA,
Hankins, T. L. (1985). Science and enlightenment. Cambridge history of science series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunter, J. (1786–87). Lectures on the principles of surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Haswell, Barrington & Haswell, 1839. [Originally delivered in 1786–87 for the Royal College of Surgeons.].
Joshua, E. (2001). Marking the dates with accuracy: The time problem in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein’. Gothic Studies,
Lo, B., & Barnes, M. (2011). Protecting research participants while reducing regulatory burdens. JAMA,
Mitchell, P. D., Boston, C., Chamberlain, A. T., Chaplin, S., Chauhan, V., Jonathan, E., et al. (2011). The study of anatomy in England from 1700 to the early 20th century. Journal of Anatomy,
Pappworth, H. M. (1967). Human guinea pigs: Experimentation in man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Reverby, S. M. (Ed.). (2000). Tuskegee’s truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee syphilis study. Studies in social medicine. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Reverby, Susan M. (Ed.). (2009). Examining Tuskegee: The infamous syphilis study and its legacy. The John Hope Franklin Series in African American history and culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Roe, S. A. (1983). John Turberville Needham and the generation of living organisms. Isis,
Saunders, J., & Wainright, P. (2003). Risk, Helsinki 2000 and the use of placebo in medical research. Clinical Medicine,
Schwartz, M. A. (2008). The importance of stupidity in scientific research. Journal of Cell Science,
Shelley, M. (1831; rpt. 1985). Frankenstein. Maurice Hindle (Ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Sieber, J. E., & Tolich, M. B. (2013). Planning ethically responsible research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Silberman, G., & Kahn, K. L. (2011). Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: The state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. The Milbank Quarterly,
Spallanzani, L. (1776). Observations and experiments upon some singular animals which may be killed and revived. Tracts on the nature of animals and vegetables. By Lazzaro
Spallanzani. (Dalyell, J.G., Trans). 2 vols. Edinburgh, 1803. Vol. 2, 251-324. (Originally published as Opuscoli di fisica animale e vegetabile, 1776).
Ude-Koeller, S., Knauer, W., & Viebahn, C. (2012). Anatomical practice at Göttingen University since the age of enlightenment and the fate of victims from Wolfenbüttel prison under Nazi rule. Annals of Anatomy–Anatomishcer Anzeiger,
Vila, A. C. (1998). Enlightenment and pathology: Sensibility in the literature and medicine of eighteenth-century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
von Haller, A. (1755). Dissertation on the sensible and irritable parts of animals. (Tissot, M. Trans.) London: J. Nourse. (Original work published as De partibus corporis humani sensibilibus et Irritabilibus, 1753).