The current paper discusses the peer review process in journals that publish research papers purveying new science and understandings (scientific journals). Different aspects of peer review including the selection of reviewers, the review process and the decision policy of editor are discussed in details. Here, the pros and cons of different conventional methods of review processes are mentioned. Finally, a suggestion is presented for the review process of scientific papers.
Spier, R. (2002a). Peer review and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics,8(1), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spier, R. (2002b). The history of the peer-review process. Trends in Biotechnology,20(8), 357–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijh, A. K. (1996). Reflections on peer review practices in committees selecting laureates for prestigious awards and prizes: Some relevant and irrelevant criteria. Science and Engineering Ethics,2(4), 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. R. (2002). Responsible authorship and peer review. Science and Engineering Ethics,8(2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar