Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 183–202

Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9521-4

Cite this article as:
Djuric, D. Sci Eng Ethics (2015) 21: 183. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9521-4


Not so long ago, a well institutionalized predatory journal exposed itself by publishing a hoax article that blew the whistle for its devastating influence on the academic affairs of a small country. This paper puts that experiment in context, gives all the important details and analyzes the results. The experiment was inspired by well-known cases of scientific activism and is in line with recent efforts against predatory publishers. The paper presents the evidence in detail and uses it to analyze the publishing practices of the offending journal, using established criteria for assessing predatory publications. That journal somehow acquired an impact factor and charged money to publish thousands of “scientific” papers without any peer review. Since the impact factor is the major official evaluation criteria for scientists in Serbia, these papers disturbed the whole academic evaluation process. Credentials acquired by those publications form a strong obstacle to institutionalized reasoned efforts against such practices. This case warns the whole community of the long lasting damage when journals with low publishing ethics are taken seriously.


Predatory publishing Whistleblowing Scientific responsibility Peer review Publication practices Professional competence 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Organizational SciencesUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations