Ethics in the Minutiae: Examining the Role of the Physical Laboratory Environment in Ethical Discourse
- 215 Downloads
Responsibility within life science research is a highly scrutinised field. Increasingly, scientists are presented with a range of duties and expectations regarding their conduct within the research setting. In many cases, these duties are presented deontologically, forgoing extensive discussion on how these are practically implemented into the minutiae of daily research practices. This de-contextualized duty has proven problematic when it comes to practical issues of compliance, however it is not often considered as a fundamental aspect of building ethics discourse. This paper examines this issue in detail, particularly focusing on how differences in the contrasts between the ideal and real physical research environments cause conceptual problems for scientists and retard ethical engagement. Such issues are particularly pertinent in low- and middle-income countries. This paper combines theoretical and empirical analyses using the concept of “dual-use” as a focalizing topic. The data show that the research environment acts as an intimate component in the interpretation and implementation of ethical actions.
KeywordsLife science ethics Empirical ethics Bioethics Research environments Low- and middle-income countries Ethics pedagogy Africa
The author would like to thank Prof Brian Rappert and Dr Mariana Wilson-Kovacs for their valuable comments on the manuscript, as well as Dr Brian Balmer for additional advice. The fieldwork presented in this paper was sponsored by a Grant from the Wellcome Trust.
Conflict of interest
There is no known conflict of interest.
- Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007a). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chambliss, D. F. (1996). Beyond caring: Hospitals, nurses, and the social organization of ethics . London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Clevestig, P. (2009). Handbook of applied biosecurity for life science laboratories . Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Fine, J. C. (2007). Investing in STI in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from collaborative initiatives in research and higher education. In Global forum: Building science, technology and innovation capacity for sustainable growth and poverty reduction (pp. 13–15). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Heimer, C. A. (2012). Wicked’ ethics: Compliance work and the practice of ethics in HIV research. Social Science & Medicine. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.030.
- Institute of Medicine. (2002). Integrity in scientific research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council.Google Scholar
- Katongole-Mbidde, E. (2008). Promoting biosafety and biosecurity within the life sciences. In Promoting biosafety and biosecurity within the life sciences: An International workshop in East Africa. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, J. C. (2003). There’s no such thing as “Business” ethics. New York: Center Street.Google Scholar
- NRC. (2011). Challenges and opportunities for education about dual-use issues in the life sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- NSABB. (2006). Globalization, biosecurity and the future of the life sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Pellegrino, E. D. (2007). Professing medicine, virtue based ethics and the retrieval of professionalism. In R. L. Walker & P. J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Working virtue: Virtue ethics and contemporary moral problems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rappert, B. (2007). Education for the life sciences: Choices and challenges. In B. Rappert & C. McLeish (Eds.), A web of prevention. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Rappert, B., McLeish, C. (Eds.) (2007b). A web of prevention. Biological weapons, life sciences and the governance of research. London, Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Sture, J. (2010). Private morals and public ethics: Cultural aspects of moral development and ethical learning in the scientific context. Canberra, Australia: Promoting Dual-Use Ethics Workshop.Google Scholar
- Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 195–230.Google Scholar
- WHO. (2004). Laboratory biosafety manual. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar