Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 947–961 | Cite as

Ethicist as Designer: A Pragmatic Approach to Ethics in the Lab

Original Paper

Abstract

Contemporary literature investigating the significant impact of technology on our lives leads many to conclude that ethics must be a part of the discussion at an earlier stage in the design process i.e., before a commercial product is developed and introduced. The problem, however, is the question regarding how ethics can be incorporated into an earlier stage of technological development and it is this question that we argue has not yet been answered adequately. There is no consensus amongst scholars as to the kind of ethics that should be practiced, nor the individual selected to perform this ethical analysis. One school of thought holds that ethics should have pragmatic value in research and design and that it should be implemented by the (computer) engineers and/or (computer) scientists themselves, while another school of thought holds that ethics need not be so pragmatic. For the latter, the ethical reflection can aim at a variety of goals, and be carried out by an ethicist. None of the approaches resulting from these lines of thinking have been adopted on a wide-scale basis. To that end, the approach presented here is intended to bridge the gap between these schools of thought. It is our contention that ethics ought to be pragmatic and to provide utility for the design process and we maintain that adequate ethical reflection, and all that it entails, ought to be conducted by an ethicist. Thus, we propose a novel role for the ethicist—the ethicist as designer—who subscribes to a pragmatic view of ethics in order to bring ethics into the research and design of artifacts—no matter the stage of development. In this paper we outline the series of steps that a pragmatic value analysis entails: uncovering relevant values, scrutinizing these values and, working towards the translation of values into technical content. In conclusion, we present a list of tasks for the ethicist in his/her role as designer on the interdisciplinary team.

Keywords

Value-sensitive design Embedded values Embedded ethicist Ethics in the lab Design for values 

References

  1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology building society (pp. 205–224). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle, Ross, W. D., Ackrill, J. L., & Urmson, J. O. (1998). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.nl/books?id=Dk2VFlZyiJQC.
  3. Brey, P. (2000). Disclosive computer ethics. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 30(4), 10–16. doi: 10.1145/572260.572264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brey, P. (2005). Artifacts as social agents. In H. Harbers (Ed.), Inside the politics of technology agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=130342.
  5. Feng, P., & Feenberg, A. (2008). Thinking about design: Critical theory of technology and the design process. In P. E. Vermaas (Ed.), Philosophy and design: From engineering to architecture (pp. 105–118). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, E. (2007). Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics, 1(2), 155–165. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0016-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., & Nissenbaum, H. (2005). Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 751–760). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1054972.1055076.
  8. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In M. E. Sharpe (Ed.), Humancomputer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348–372).Google Scholar
  10. Grunwald, A. (2001). The application of ethics to engineering and the engineer’s moral responsibility: Perspectives for a research agenda. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 415–428. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0063-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helft, M. (2010, February 13). Critics say Google invades privacy with new service. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/13/technology/internet/13google.html.
  12. Houkes, W., Vermaas, P. E., Dorst, K., & de Vries, M. J. (2002). Design and use as plans: An action–theoretical account. Design Studies, 23(3), 303–320. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00040-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, B., & Vegas, L. (2010, January 11). Privacy no longer a social norm, says Facebook founder. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy.
  14. Manders-Huits, Noèemi. (2011). What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manders-Huits, N., & Zimmer, M. (2009). Values and pragmatic action: The challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in technical design communities. International Review of Information Ethics, 10(2), 37–45.Google Scholar
  16. Moore, A. (2008). Defining privacy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(3), 411–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2008.00433.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nissenbaum, H. (2001). How computer systems embody values. Computer, 34(3), 120–119. doi: 10.1109/2.910905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Queraltó, R. (2013). Ethics as a beneficial Trojan Horse in a Technological Society. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 13–26. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9287-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rabinow, P. (2012). Designing human practices: An experiment with synthetic biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Buskirk, E. (2010). Report: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Doesn’t Believe In Privacy | Wired Business | Wired.com. Wired Business. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.wired.com/business/2010/04/report-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-doesnt-believe-in-privacy/.
  23. Van de Poel, I. (2009). Values in engineering design. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Volume 9: Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Van de Poel, I. (forthcoming). Translating values into design requiremeents. In D. Mitchfelder, N. McCarty, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Van de Poel, I., & Kroes, P. (forthcoming). Can technology embody values? In P. Kroes, & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Moral agency and technical artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Van der Burg, S. (2009). Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(1), 97–110. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9079-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Burg, S., & Swierstra, T. (Eds.). (2013). Ethics on the laboratory floor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Van der Burg, S., & van Gorp, A. (2005). Understanding moral responsibility in the design of trailers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 235–256. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0044-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Gorp, A., & van de Poel, I. (2008). Deciding on ethical issues in engineering design. In Philosophy and design (pp. 77–89). Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_6.
  30. Van Gorp, A., & van der Molen, S. (2011). Parallel, embedded or just part of the team: Ethicists cooperating within a European security research project. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9187-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and engineering ethics, 1–27.Google Scholar
  32. Verbeek, P. (2008). Morality in design; Design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In P. E. Vermaas (Ed.), Philosophy and design: From engineering to architecture (pp. 91–102). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. doi: 10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical PhilosophyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations