Abstract
Interdisciplinary courses on science, engineering and society have been successfully established in two cases, at Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, and at the University of Hamburg, Germany. In both cases there were institutional and perceptual barriers that had to be overcome in the primarily disciplinary departments. The ingredients of success included a clear vision of interdisciplinary themes and didactics, and the exploitation of institutional opportunities. Haldun M. Ozaktas in Ankara used the dynamics of an accreditation process to establish courses on engineering and society. At the University of Hamburg the introduction of optional courses into all curricula allowed for the establishment of a seminar series on physics and society, as well as on peace education and peace building. Both of these approaches have a weakness in common: the courses can disappear once their initiators have left, unless the interdisciplinary themes are integrated into compulsory core curricula.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K. & Krogh, L. (eds.). (2007). The Aalborg PBL model. Progress, diversity and challenges. Aalborg University Press. http://forlag.aau.dk/Shop/laering-og-uddannelse/the-aalborg-pbl-model.aspx (Accessed 13 Sept 2013).
Ozaktas, H. M. (2012). Teaching science, technology, and society to engineering students: A sixteen year journey. Science and Engineering Ethics 19, this issue, doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9329-4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spitzer, H. Introduction of Interdisciplinary Teaching: Two Case Studies. Sci Eng Ethics 19, 1451–1454 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9475-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9475-y