Abstract
Advances in the neurosciences have many implications for a collective understanding of what it means to be human, in particular, notions of the self, the concept of volition or agency, questions of individual responsibility, and the phenomenology of consciousness. As the ability to peer directly into the brain is scientifically honed, and conscious states can be correlated with patterns of neural processing, an easy—but premature—leap is to postulate a one-way, brain-based determinism. That leap is problematic, however, and emerging findings in neuroscience can even be seen as compatible with some of the basic tenets of existentialism. Given the compelling authority of modern “science,” it is especially important to question how the findings of neuroscience are framed, and how the articulation of research results challenge or change individuals’ perceptions of themselves. Context plays an essential role in the emergence of human identity and in the sculpting of the human brain; for example, even a lack of stimuli (“nothing”) can lead to substantial consequences for brain, behavior, and experience. Conversely, advances in understanding the brain might contribute to more precise definitions of what it means to be human, including definitions of appropriate social and moral behavior. Put another way, the issue is not simply the ethics involved in framing neurotechnology, but also the incorporation of neuroscientific findings into a richer understanding of human ethical (and existential) functioning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Center was the host/sponsor/organizer of “Neuroethics Week” in 2007, the event from which this essay springs (Kalichman et al. 2012).
References
Bird, S. J. (2005). Neuroethics. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics (pp. 1310–1316). Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.
Bird, S. J. (2009). Neuroethics. In L. Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (Vol. 6, pp. 385–391). Oxford: Academic Press.
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
Churchland, P. M. (1995). The engine of reason, the seat of the soul. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself. New York: Viking.
Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), The handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Edelman, G. M. (2001). Consciousness: The remembered present. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 929, 111–122.
Edelman, G. M. (2004). Wider than the sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Edelman, G. M. (2006). Second nature, brain science and human knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Edelman, G. M., & Gally, J. A. (2001). Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings from National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 13763–13768.
Eluvathingal, T. J., Chugani, H. T., Behen, M. E., Juhász, C., Muzik, O., Maqbool, M., et al. (2006). Abnormal brain connectivity in children after early severe socioemotional deprivation: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Pediatrics, 117(6), 2093–2100.
Frost, C. J., Arfken, M., & Brock, D. (2001). The psychology of self-deception as illustrated in literary characters. Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology, and the Arts, 4(2), 331–354.
Frost, C. J., & Frost, K. M. (2012). Adoption: Homeward bound. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 92(2), 12–14.
Frost, K. M., & Frost, C. J. (2002). On loss and melancholy: An autobiographical essay. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 7, 185–201.
Gadamer, H. (1960). Truth and method. New York: Crossroad/Continuum.
Gazzaniga, M. J. (2005). The ethical brain. New York, Washington, DC: Dana Press.
Greely, H. (2007). On neuroethics. Science, 318, 533.
Hartshorne, C. (1948). The divine relativity: A social conception of god. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Herzfeld, N. (2009). Technology and religion: Remaining human in a co-created world. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.
Hilgard, E. R. (Ed.). (1978). American psychology in historical perspective: Addresses of the Presidents of the American Psychological Association (1892–1977). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hulsey, T., & Frost, C. J. (2004). Moral cruelty: Ameaning and the justification of harm. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Illes, J., & Bird, S. J. (2006). Neuroethics: A modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends in Neuroscience, 29, 511–517.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover.
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier Books.
Kalichman, M., Plemmons, D., & Bird, S. J. (2012). Editors’ overview—neuroethics: Many voices and many stories. Science and Engineering Ethics 18, this issue.
Llinas, R. R. (2001). I of the vortex: From neuron to self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Llinas, R. R., & Ribary, U. (1993). Coherent 40-Hz oscillation characterizes dream state in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90.
Llinas, R. R., Ribary, U., Contreras, D., Pedroarena, C., et al. (1998). The neural basis for consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 353, 1841–1849.
Marcus, S. J. (Ed.). (2002). Neuroethics: Mapping the field. San Francisco: The Dana Foundation Press.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
Mumford, M. D. (2012). Handbook of organizational creativity. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
Nelson, C., Zeanah, C., Fox, N., Marshall, P., Smyke, A., & Guthrie, D. (2007). Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: The Bucharest early intervention project. In Science, 318(5858), 1937–1940.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
Ramachandran, V. S. (2004). A brief tour of human consciousness. New York: PI Press.
Robinson, D. (1981). An intellectual history of psychology (Revised ed.). New York: Macmillan. (Originally published, 1976.).
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 359, 1787–1796.
Smith, S. R. (2012). “Neuroscience, ethics and legal responsibility: The problem of the insanity defense. Commentary on ‘The ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics: A phenomenological—existential approach.’” Science and Engineering Ethics 18, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9390-7
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughhron, J. J., Theil, C. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics and Behavior, 20, 110–127.
Stevens, W. (1937). The man with the blue guitar & other poems. New York: Knopf.
Teicher, M. H., Andersen, S. L., Polcari, A., Anderson, C. M., Navalta, C. P., & Kim, D. M. (2003). The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 33–44.
Tononi, G., Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. M. (1992). Reentry and the problem of integrating multiple cortical areas: Simulation of dynamic integration in the visual system. Cerebral Cortex, 2(4), 310–335.
Weil, S. (1957). Intimations of Christianity among the Ancient Greets (E. C. Geissbuhler, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frost, C.J., Lumia, A.R. The Ethics of Neuroscience and the Neuroscience of Ethics: A Phenomenological–Existential Approach. Sci Eng Ethics 18, 457–474 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9388-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9388-1
Keywords
- Neuroethics
- Neuroimaging
- fMRI
- Critical neuroscience
- Neurohumanities
- Neuroskepticism
- Existential-phenomenological approach to consciousness
- Neural correlates of consciousness
- Humanities and neuroscience
- Humanities and technology
- Perspectivism
- Neuroscience and volition
- Process approaches to consciousness
- Neuroscience and human agency
- Neuroscience and the “two cultures”
- Social neuroscience
- Philosophy of mind
- Internalism
- Authenticity