On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy
- 142 Downloads
The identification of plausible epistemic approaches in science as well as the social problem definitions with which scientists implicitly work is essential for the quality of a deliberative public policy. While responding to the Nanofutures project, I will reflect on the essential elements of such a policy.
KeywordsDeliberation Public policy Nanotechnology Plausibility
- Drexler, E. (2003). Open letter to Richard Smalley. Chemical and Engineering News, 81, 38–39.Google Scholar
- Selin, C. (2011). Negotiating plausibility: Intervening in the future of nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17 (this issue).Google Scholar
- Smalley, R. (2003). Smalley responds. Chemical and Engineering News, 81, 39–42.Google Scholar
- Van Oudheusden, M. (2011). Questioning ‘Participation’: A critical appraisal of its conceptualization in a flemish participatory technology assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), (this issue).Google Scholar
- Von Schomberg, R. (1993). Controversies and political decision making. In R. Von Schomberg (Ed.), Science, politics and morality. Scientific uncertainty and decision making. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Von Schomberg, R. (2007). From the ethics of technology towards the ethics of knowledge policy and assessment. Working document from the European Commission services. Brussels January. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society under e-library, responsible governance.
- Von Schomberg, R., Pereira, A. G., & Funtowicz, S. (2005). Deliberating foresight knowledge for policy and knowledge assessment. Working document from the European Commission services, Brussels, November. Available: http://cordis.europa.eu/foresight/working.htm.