Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 179–187 | Cite as

Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers’ Ethics

Original Paper

Abstract

Engineering ethics is usually focused on engineers’ ethics, engineers acting as individuals. Certainly, these professionals play a central role in the matter, but engineers are not a singularity inside engineering; they exist and operate as a part of a complex network of mutual relationships between many other people, organizations and groups. When engineering ethics and engineers’ ethics are taken as one and the same thing the paradigm of the ethical engineer which prevails is that of the heroic engineer, a certain model of the ideal engineer: someone both quite individualistic and strong enough to deal with all the moral challenges that could arise. We argue that this is not the best approach, at least today in our interrelated world. We have achieved a high degree of independence from nature by means of technology. In exchange for this autonomy we have become increasingly tied up with very complex systems to which we constantly delegate new tasks and powers. Concerns about safety keep growing everywhere due to the fact that now we have a sensitive awareness of the huge amount of power we are both consuming and deploying, thus, new forms of dialogue and consensus have to be incorporated at different levels, in different forums and at different times. Within these democratic channels of participation not just the needs and interests, but also the responsibilities and mutual commitments of all parties should be taken into account.

Keywords

Engineering ethics Professional responsibility Responsible engineer Engineering education 

References

  1. Adam, A. (2001). Heroes or sibyls? Gender and engineering ethics. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, 20(3), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Boyer, E. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Broome, T. H., & Peirce, J. (1997). The heroic engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bucciarelli, L. (2007). Ethics and engineering education: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/40284/ethics_20_talk.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 24 May 2011.
  6. Buck, P., et al. (1945). General education in a free society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M. (2003). What’s philosophically interesting about engineering ethics? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(3), 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durbin, P. T. (2008). Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33(3), 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FEANI position paper on Code of Conduct: Ethics and Conduct of Professional Engineers. (2006). http://www.feani.org/webfeani/Statements/Position%20Paper%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20Ethics%20approved%20GA%202006.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
  10. Fleddermann, C. B. (2004). Engineering ethics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  11. Fleischmann, S. T. (2004). Essential ethics–embedding ethics into an engineering curriculum. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2009). Engineering ethics: Concepts & cases (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. IEEE Code of Ethics. (2006). http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs/about/CoE_poster.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
  14. Johnson, D. (1991). Ethical issues in engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Kline, R. R. (2001). Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, 20(4), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leveson, N. G., & Turner, C. S. (1993). An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7), 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynch, W. T., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practice and engineering ethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(2), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. (2007). http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
  20. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. (1986). http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/table-of-contents.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
  21. Stohl, C., Stohl, M., & Popova, L. (2009). A new generation of corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 607–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. United Nations Global Compact. (1999). http://www.unglobalcompact.org/. Accessed 23 Feb 2011.
  23. Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaCerdanyola del Vallès, CatalunyaSpain
  2. 2.Universitat Oberta de CatalunyaBarcelona, CatalunyaSpain

Personalised recommendations