Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 107–122 | Cite as

The Risks of Absolute Medical Confidentiality



Some ethicists argue that patient confidentiality is absolute and thus should never be broken. I examine these arguments that when critically scrutinised, become porous. I will explore the concept of patient confidentiality and argue that although, this is a very important medical and bioethical issue, this needs to be wisely delivered to reduce third party harm or even detriment to the patient. The argument for absolute confidentiality is particularly weak when it comes to genetic information and inherited disease.


Confidentiality Medical ethics Genetics Information technology 


  1. Abbo, E. D. (2006). Rare but routine, the physician’s obligation to protect third parties. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Medical Association’s Code of Medical Ethics. (2011).
  3. Baker, R. (2006). Confidentiality in professional ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balint, J. (2006). Should confidentiality in medicine be absolute? The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 19–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (PBE). New York: OUP.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, J. (2006). A qualified defence of legal disclosure requirements. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 25–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BMA. (2004). The BMA’s handbook of ethics and law (2nd ed.). London: BMJ Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, P. (2003). The requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998 for the processing of medical data. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boylan, M. (2006). The duty to rescue and the limits of confidentiality. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brazier, M. (2003). Medicine, patients and the law (3rd ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Brazier, M., & Harris, J. (1996). Public health and private lives. Medical Law Review, 4, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2008). Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: Liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(4), 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Data Protection Registrar. (1992). Eighth report of the Data Protection Registrar. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, C., & Collins, R. (2006). Balancing potential risks and benefits of using confidential data. British Medical Journal, 333, 349–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dimond, B. (2004). Legal aspects of patient confidentiality. BJN Monograph. Wiltshire: Quay Books.Google Scholar
  16. Duncan v Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee. (1986). 1 NZLR 513.Google Scholar
  17. Duncan, R. E., & Newson, A. J. (2006). Clinical genetics the problem with unqualified confidentiality. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francis, H. W. S. (1982). Gossips, eavesdroppers and peeping Toms. A defence to the right of privacy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 8, 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furniss v Fitchett. (1958). NZLR 39, 6.Google Scholar
  20. General Medical Council. (2000). Confidentiality: Protecting and providing information. London, UK: General Medical Council.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, E. (2006). Medical confidentiality and protection of third party interests. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbar, R. (2007). Communicating genetic information in the family; the familial relationship as the forgotten factor. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 390–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillon, R. (2004). Telling the truth, confidentiality, consent and respect for autonomy. In J. Harris (Ed.), Bioethics (pp. 507–528). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  24. Goldblatt, P. (2006). Evidence will help a consensus. British Medical Journal, 332, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldstein, A. (1999). Long reach into patient’s privacy, new uses of data illustrate potential benefit and hazards. Washington Post Aug 23.Google Scholar
  26. Gostin, L. O. (2001). Health information: Reconciling personal privacy with the public good of human health. Health Care Analysis, 9, 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gudena, R., Luwemba, S., Williams, A., & Jenkinson, L. R. (2004). Data protection gone too far: Questionnaire survey of patients’ and visitors’ views about having their names displayed in hospital. Brutish Medical Journal, 329, 1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guedi, M., Sastre, M. T. M., Mullet, E., & Sorum, P. C. (2006). Do French lay people and health professionals find it acceptable to break confidentiality to protect a patient’s wife from a sexually transmitted disease? Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hallam, K. (1999). Feds: Price of privacy may be too high. FBI, Justice Department say patient confidentiality bills would threaten fraud crackdown. Modern Healthcare, 29(18), 12–13.Google Scholar
  30. Havard, J. (1985). Medical confidence. Journal of Medical Ethics, 11, 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hellman, S. (1995). The patient and the public good. Nature Medicine, 1(5), 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodge, J. G. (2006). The legal and ethical fiction of ‘pure’ confidentiality. The American Journal of Bioethics, 62, 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Human Rights Act. (1998).Google Scholar
  34. Iversen, A., Liddell, K., Fear, N., Hotopf, M., & Wessely, S. (2006). Consent, confidentiality and the data protection act. British Medical Journal, 332, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jenkins, G., Merz, J. F., & Sankar, P. (2005). A qualitative study of women’s views on medical confidentiality. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, C. (2003). The utilitarian argument for medical confidentiality: A pilot study of patients’ views. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 348–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalra, D., Gertz, R., Singleton, P., & Inskip, H. M. (2006). Confidentiality of personal health information used for research. British Medical Journal, 333, 196–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keeling, S. L. (2004). Duty to warn of genetic harm in breach of patient confidentiality. Journal of Law and Medicine, 12(2), 235–253.Google Scholar
  39. Kent, A. (2003). Consent and confidentiality in genetics: Whose information is it anyway? Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kipnis, K. (2006). A defence of unqualified medical confidentiality. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klitzman, R. (2006). Qualifying confidentiality. Historical and empirical issues and facts. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knowles, A., & McMahon, M. (1995). Expectations and preferences regarding confidentiality in the psychologist-client relationship. Australian Psychologist, 30, 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kottow, M. H. (1986). Medical confidentiality: An intransigent and absolute obligation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 12(3), 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuhse, H. (1996). Confidentiality and the AMA’s new code of ethics: an imprudent formulation. The Medical Journal of Australia, 165, 327–329.Google Scholar
  45. Lachmann, P. (2003). Consent and confidentiality—where are the limits? An introduction. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leung, W., Mariman, E. C. M., van der Wouden, J. C., van Amerongen, H., & Weijer, C. (2000). Results of genetic testing; when confidentiality conflicts with a duty to warn relatives. British Medical Jounal, 321, 1464–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liesegang, T. J. (1999). Potential effect of authorisation bias on medical record research. American Journal of Opthalmology, 128, 129.Google Scholar
  48. Løvseth, L. T., Aasland, O. G., Fridner, A., Jónsdottir, L. S., Marini, M., & Linaker, O. M. (2010). Confidentiality and physicians’ health. A cross-sectional study of University Hospital Physicians in four European cities (the HOUPE-study). Journal of Occupational Health, 52(5), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lucassen, A., & Parker, M. (2004). Confidentiality and serious harm in genetics—preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to relatives. European Journal of Human Genetics, 12, 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mason, J. K., McCall Smith, R. A., & Laurie, G. T. (2003). Law and medical ethics (6th ed.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  51. McCarthy, D. B., Shatin, D., Drinkard, C. R., Kleinman, J. H., & Gardner, J. S. (1999). Medical records and privacy: Empirical effects of legislation. Health Services Research, 34(1 Pt 2), 417–425.Google Scholar
  52. Melton, L. J. (1997). The threat to medical-records research. New England Journal of Medicine, 337, 1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Molloy v Meier (2004) 679 N.W.2d 711, 718 (Minn).Google Scholar
  54. Moore v. The Regents of University of California (1990) 51 Cal. 3d 120; 271 Cal. Rptr. 146; 793 P.2d 479.Google Scholar
  55. NHS Code of Practice. (2003). Confidentiality. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  56. O’Brien, J., & Chantler, C. (2003). Confidentiality and the duties of care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Offit, K., Groeger, E., Turner, S., Wadsworth, E. A., & Weiser, M. A. (2004). The ‘duty to warn’ a patient’s family members about hereditary disease risks. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1469–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parkes, R. (1982). The duty of confidence. British Medical Journal, 285, 1442–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pate v Threlkel. (1995). 661 So 2d 278.Google Scholar
  60. Paterson, I. C. M. (2001). Consent to cancer registration—an unnecessary burden. British Medical Journal, 322, 1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perez-Carceles, M. D., Pereniguez, J. E., Osuna, E., & Luna, A. (2005). Balancing confidentiality and the information provided to families of patients in primary care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. R v Cardiff Crown Court ex p Kellam. (1993). 16 BMLR 76.Google Scholar
  63. R v Crozier. (1990). 8 BMLR 128.Google Scholar
  64. R v Department of Health ex p Source Informatics. (2000). Lloyd’s Rep Med.Google Scholar
  65. R v Harrison. (2000). WL 1026999.Google Scholar
  66. Raginsky, B. B. (1969). Hypnotic recall of air crash cause. International Journal of Clinical Experimental Hypnosis, 17, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robertson, C. (2006). The consequences of qualified confidentiality. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 31–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rose, A. L., Peters, N., Shea, J. A., & Armstrong, K. (2005). Attitudes and misconceptions about predictive genetic testing for cancer risk. Community Genetics, 8(3), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Safer v. Estate of Pack. (1966). 677 A.2d 1188.Google Scholar
  70. Scott, C. (2000). Is too much privacy bad for your health? An introduction to the law, ethics and HIPAA rule on medical privacy. Georgia St. University Law Review, 17, 481–529.Google Scholar
  71. Sieghart, P. (1984). Medical confidence, the law and computers. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 77, 656–662.Google Scholar
  72. Siegler, M. (1982). Confidentiality in medicine. A decrepit concept. New England Journal of Medicine, 307, 1518–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singer, E., Antonucci, T., & Van Hoewyk, J. (2004). Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing. Genetic Testing, 8(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Society Guardian. (2005). (4th January, 2005).
  75. Sporle, A., & Koea, J. (2004). Maori responsiveness in health and medical research: Key factors for researchers. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 117, U997.Google Scholar
  76. Stephens v Avery and others. (1988). 2All ER 477.Google Scholar
  77. Suhadev, M., Mahadevan, U., Dilip, M., Suryanarayanan, D., Sikhamani, R., & Thomas, B. (2011). Percentages, process, and patterns of HIV disclosure among the spouses of HIV-infected men in south India. Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (Chicago), 10(1), 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tarasoff V The Regents of the University of California. (1976). 17 cal (3d) 358.Google Scholar
  79. The Caldicott Committee. (1997). The Caldicott Report, Department of Health.Google Scholar
  80. W v Egdell. (1989). All ER 1089.Google Scholar
  81. Wachbroit, R. (1993). Rethinking medical confidentiality: The importance of genetics. Suffolk University Law Review, 27(4), 1391–1410.Google Scholar
  82. Wartenberg, W., & Thompson, W. D. (2010). Privacy versus public health; the impact of current confidentiality rules. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolff, K., Brun, W., Kvale, G., & Nordin, K. (2007). Confidentiality versus duty to inform. An empirical study on attitudes towards the handling of genetic information. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 143(2), 142–148.Google Scholar
  84. World Medical Association’s International Code of Ethics. (1985).
  85. Z. v. Finland. (1998). 25 EHRR 371.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic MedicineUniversity Hospital LewishamLewishamUK
  2. 2.University of GreenwichGreenwichUK

Personalised recommendations