Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 339–349 | Cite as

A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education



Engineering ethics education is a complex field characterized by dynamic topics and diverse students, which results in significant challenges for engineering ethics educators. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to determine what to teach and how to teach in an ethics curriculum. This is a topic that has not been adequately addressed in the engineering ethics literature. This systematic approach provides a method to: (1) develop a context-specific engineering ethics curriculum using the Delphi technique, a process-driven research method; and (2) identify appropriate delivery strategies and instructional strategies using an instructional design model. This approach considers the context-specific needs of different engineering disciplines in ethics education and leverages the collaboration of engineering professors, practicing engineers, engineering graduate students, ethics scholars, and instructional design experts. The proposed approach is most suitable for a department, a discipline/field or a professional society. The approach helps to enhance learning outcomes and to facilitate ethics education curriculum development as part of the regular engineering curriculum.


Engineering ethics Ethics education Systematic approach Engineering education Collaborative Instructional design 


  1. Berne, R. W. (2003). Ethics technology and the future: An intergenerational experience in engineering education. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 23(2), 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird, S.J. (2003). Integrating ethics education at all levels: Ethics as a core competency. Retrieved from National Academy of Engineering 29 Dec 2009 .
  3. Bucciarelli, L. L. (2008). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 327–338.Google Scholar
  5. Cruz, J. A., & Frey, W. J. (2003). An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An ABET 2000 challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 543–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, Rand Corporation. Available from: [Accessed 25 July 2010].
  7. Dalkey, N. C., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M. (2006). Engineering ethics, individuals, and organizations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekstrom, J. J., Gorka, S., Kamali, R., Lawson, E., Lunt, B., Miller, J., et al. (2006). The information technology model curriculum. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 343–362.Google Scholar
  11. Eskandari, H., Sala-Diakanda, S., Furterer, S., Rabelo, L., Crumton-Young, L., & Williams, K. (2007) Enhancing the undergraduate industrial engineering curriculum: Defining desired characteristics and emerging topics. Education and Training, 49(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleddermann, C. B. (2000). Engineering ethics cases for electrical and computer engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(3), 284–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gagne, R. M., Brigggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publisher.Google Scholar
  14. Graber, G. C., & Pionke, C. D. (2006). A team-taught interdisciplinary approach to engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychology Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haws, D. R. (2006). Engineering the Just War: Examination of an approach to teaching engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herkert, J. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herkert, J., Wetmore, J., Canary, H., & Ellison, K. (2009). Integrating microethics and macroethics in graduate science and engineering education: Developing instructional models, Retrieved February 6, 2010, from American Society for Engineering Education:
  19. Hirsch, P. L., Bird, S. J., & D’Avila, M. (2003). Enriching the research experience for undergraduates in biomedical engineering. In Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition. Washington, D.C, (pp 283–292) American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  20. Hollander, R. & Arenberg, C. R. (2009). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What’s been learned? What should be done? Summary of a workshop. Retrieved February 6, 2010, from National Academy of Engineering:
  21. Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation., 12(10), 1–8.Google Scholar
  22. Huff, C. W., & Frey, W. (2005). Moral pedagogy and practical ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IEEE (2010). IEEE code of ethics. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from IEEE:
  24. Iqbal, S., & Pipon-Young, L. (2009). The Delphi method. The Psychologist, 22(7), 598–601.Google Scholar
  25. Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., et al. (2008). Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kropp, R. P. (1973). Curriculum development: Principles and methods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(4), 735–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladd, J. (1980). The quest for a code of professional ethics: an intellectual and moral confusion. In R. Chalk, M. S. Frankel, & S. B. Chafer (Eds.), AAAS professional ethics project: professional ethics activities in the scientific and engineering societies (pp. 154–159). Washington, D.C.: AAAS.Google Scholar
  28. Lynch, W. T., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practices and engineering ethics. Science Technology & Human Values, 25(2), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th edn.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  30. McGinn, R. E. (2003). “Mind the gaps”: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 517–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NSPE (2010). NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from National Society of Professional Engineers:
  32. O’Connell, B., & Herkert, J. R. (2004). Engineering ethics and computer ethics: Twins separated at birth? Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(1), 36–56.Google Scholar
  33. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rabins, M. J., Harris, E., Pritchard, M. S. & Lowery, L. L. (2009). Introducing ethics case studies into required undergraduate engineering course. Retrieved November, 15, 2009, from Texas A&M University:
  35. Reilly, P. L. (1986). Curriculum revision using advisory committees and a modification of the Delphi technique for electronic engineering technology programs. Practicum Paper, Nova University. ED275913.Google Scholar
  36. Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1995). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd edn.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  37. Rossouw, A., Hacker M., & de Vries, M. J. (2010). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9129-1.
  38. Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (1992). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Tomkinson, B., & Engel, C. (2008). The use of a Delphi consultation to explore the curriculum for sustainable development in engineering. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(4), 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger lanch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Weil, V. (2003). Ethics across the curriculum: Preparing engineering and science faculty to introduce ethics into their teaching. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from National Academy of Engineering:
  42. Yutrzenka, B. A. (1995). Making a case for training in ethnic and cultural diversity in increasing treatment efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zandvoort, H., Van Hasselt, G. J., & Bonnet, J. A. B. A. F. (2008). A joint venture model of teaching required courses in ‘ethics and engineering’ to engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Learning TechnologiesUniversity of North Texas, UNT Discovery ParkDentonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of North Texas, UNT Discovery ParkDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations