A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education
Engineering ethics education is a complex field characterized by dynamic topics and diverse students, which results in significant challenges for engineering ethics educators. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to determine what to teach and how to teach in an ethics curriculum. This is a topic that has not been adequately addressed in the engineering ethics literature. This systematic approach provides a method to: (1) develop a context-specific engineering ethics curriculum using the Delphi technique, a process-driven research method; and (2) identify appropriate delivery strategies and instructional strategies using an instructional design model. This approach considers the context-specific needs of different engineering disciplines in ethics education and leverages the collaboration of engineering professors, practicing engineers, engineering graduate students, ethics scholars, and instructional design experts. The proposed approach is most suitable for a department, a discipline/field or a professional society. The approach helps to enhance learning outcomes and to facilitate ethics education curriculum development as part of the regular engineering curriculum.
KeywordsEngineering ethics Ethics education Systematic approach Engineering education Collaborative Instructional design
- Bird, S.J. (2003). Integrating ethics education at all levels: Ethics as a core competency. Retrieved from National Academy of Engineering 29 Dec 2009 .http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11083.html.
- Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 327–338.Google Scholar
- Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, Rand Corporation. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/2005/RM5888.pdf. [Accessed 25 July 2010].
- Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ekstrom, J. J., Gorka, S., Kamali, R., Lawson, E., Lunt, B., Miller, J., et al. (2006). The information technology model curriculum. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 343–362.Google Scholar
- Gagne, R. M., Brigggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publisher.Google Scholar
- Herkert, J., Wetmore, J., Canary, H., & Ellison, K. (2009). Integrating microethics and macroethics in graduate science and engineering education: Developing instructional models, Retrieved February 6, 2010, from American Society for Engineering Education: http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=11085.
- Hirsch, P. L., Bird, S. J., & D’Avila, M. (2003). Enriching the research experience for undergraduates in biomedical engineering. In Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition. Washington, D.C, (pp 283–292) American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
- Hollander, R. & Arenberg, C. R. (2009). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What’s been learned? What should be done? Summary of a workshop. Retrieved February 6, 2010, from National Academy of Engineering: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12695.
- Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation., 12(10), 1–8.Google Scholar
- IEEE (2010). IEEE code of ethics. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from IEEE: http://www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/ethics/code.html.
- Iqbal, S., & Pipon-Young, L. (2009). The Delphi method. The Psychologist, 22(7), 598–601.Google Scholar
- Ladd, J. (1980). The quest for a code of professional ethics: an intellectual and moral confusion. In R. Chalk, M. S. Frankel, & S. B. Chafer (Eds.), AAAS professional ethics project: professional ethics activities in the scientific and engineering societies (pp. 154–159). Washington, D.C.: AAAS.Google Scholar
- Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th edn.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- NSPE (2010). NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from National Society of Professional Engineers: http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html.
- O’Connell, B., & Herkert, J. R. (2004). Engineering ethics and computer ethics: Twins separated at birth? Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(1), 36–56.Google Scholar
- Rabins, M. J., Harris, E., Pritchard, M. S. & Lowery, L. L. (2009). Introducing ethics case studies into required undergraduate engineering course. Retrieved November, 15, 2009, from Texas A&M University: http://ethics.tamu.edu/.
- Reilly, P. L. (1986). Curriculum revision using advisory committees and a modification of the Delphi technique for electronic engineering technology programs. Practicum Paper, Nova University. ED275913.Google Scholar
- Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1995). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd edn.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Rossouw, A., Hacker M., & de Vries, M. J. (2010). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9129-1.
- Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (1992). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
- Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger lanch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Weil, V. (2003). Ethics across the curriculum: Preparing engineering and science faculty to introduce ethics into their teaching. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from National Academy of Engineering: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11083.html.