Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A team-taught interdisciplinary approach to engineering ethics

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines the development and implementation of a new course in Engineering Ethics at the University of Tennessee. This is a three-semester-hour course and is jointly taught by an engineering professor and a philosophy professor.

While traditional pedagogical techniques such as case studies, position papers, and classroom discussions are used, additional activities such as developing a code of ethics and student-developed scenarios are employed to encourage critical thinking. Among the topics addressed in the course are engineering as a profession and its role in society; ethical successes and failures; risk, safety, and the environment; professional responsibilities; credit and intellectual property; and international concerns.

The most significant aspect of the course is that it brings both engineering and non-engineering points of view to the topics at hand. This is accomplished in two ways. First, as mentioned previously, it is team-taught by engineering faculty with an interest in ethical and societal issues, and by philosophy faculty with expertise in the field of professional ethics and an interest in science and technology. Second, the course is offered to both engineers and non-engineers. This mix of students requires that all students must be able to explain their technical and ethical decisions in a non-technical manner. Work teams are structured to maximize interdisciplinary interaction and to foster insights by each student into the professional commitments and attitudes of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc, (2003). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Baltimore.

  2. Davis, M. (1998). Thinking Like An Engineer, Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schinzinger, R., and Martin, M.W. (2000). Introduction to Engineering Ethics, McGraw Hill, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleddermann, C.B. (1999). Engineering Ethics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whitbeck, C. (1998). Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, Jr., C.E., Pritchard, M.S., and Rabins, J. (2000). Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 2nd ed, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Florman, S.C. (1987). The Civilized Engineer, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Glenn C. Graber or Christopher D. Pionke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graber, G.C., Pionke, C.D. A team-taught interdisciplinary approach to engineering ethics. SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 313–320 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0029-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0029-4

Keywords

Navigation