Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patenting humans: Clones, chimeras, and biological artifacts

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The momentum of advances in biology is evident in the history of patents on life forms. As we proceed forward with greater understanding and technological control of developmental biology there will be many new and challenging dilemmas related to patenting of human parts and partial trajectories of human development. These dilemmas are already evident in the current conflict over the moral status of the early human embryo. In this essay, recent evidence from embryological studies is considered and the unbroken continuity of organismal development initiated at fertilization is asserted as clear and reasonable grounds for moral standing. Within this frame of analysis, it is proposed that through a technique of Altered Nuclear Transfer, non-organismal entities might be created from which embryonic stem cells could be morally procured. Criteria for patenting of such non-organismal entities are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004. Pub. L. No. 108–109, 118 Stat. 3.

  2. The President’s Council on Bioethics. (2004) Reproduction and Responsibility. Washington, D.C., pp. 162–164.

  3. Kevles, Daniel J. (2002) A History of Patenting Life in the United States with Comparative Attention to Europe and Canada, pp. 11–17, President’s Council on Bioethics Readings.

  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Organization, Manual of Patent Examination Procedure, section 2105.

  5. 55 BNA Patent, Trademark & Copyright J. 1371 (April 9, 1998).

  6. 58 BNA Patent, Trademark & Copyright J. 1430 (Jun 17, 1999).

  7. Pearson, Helen. (2002) Your Destiny, From Day One. Nature 418 (July 4): 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner, R. L. (2001) Specification of Embryonic Axes Begins before Cleavage in Normal Mouse Development. Development 128: 839–847.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grabel, L., Becker S., Lock L., Maye P., Zanders T. (1998) Using EC and ES Cell Culture to Study Early Development: Recent Observations on Indian Hedgehog and BMPs. International Journal of Developmental Biology 42: 917–925.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piotrowska, K & Zernicka-Goetz M. (2001) Role of Sperm in Spatial Patterning of the Early Mouse Embryo. Nature 409: 517–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Costa, A. L. E. da, Abdelmassih S., Oliveira F. G. de, Abdelmassih V., Abdelmassih R., Nagy Z. P., Balmaceda J. P. (2001) Monozygotic Twins and Transfer at the Blastocyst Stage after ICSI. Human Reproduction 16: 333–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Testimony of Rudolph Jaenisch, President’s Council on Bioethics, July 2003, at www,bioethics.gov.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Program in Human Biology, Stanford University, Building 80, 94305-2160, Stanford, CA, USA

    William B. Hurlbut M.D. (Member, The (US) President’s Council on Bioethics)

Authors
  1. William B. Hurlbut M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William B. Hurlbut M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurlbut, W.B. Patenting humans: Clones, chimeras, and biological artifacts. SCI ENG ETHICS 11, 21–29 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0052-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0052-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation