Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 347–366 | Cite as

Teaching research ethics: Can web-based instruction satisfy appropriate pedagogical objectives?

Article

Abstract

Ethical tasks faced by researchers in science and engineering as they engage in research include recognition of moral problems in their practice, finding solutions to those moral problems, judging moral actions and engaging in preventive ethics. Given these issues, appropriate pedagogical objectives for research ethics education include (1) teaching researchers to recognize moral issues in their research, (2) teaching researchers to solve practical moral problems in their research from the perspective of the moral agent, (3) teaching researchers how to make moral judgments about actions, and (4) learning to engage in preventive ethics. If web-based research ethics education is intended to be adequate and sufficient for research ethics education, then it must meet those objectives. However there are reasons to be skeptical that it can.

Keywords

Teaching Research Ethics Web-based instruction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wallace, James D. (1996) Ethical Norms, Particular Cases. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris, C.E. Jr., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M.J. (1995) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 2 nd Edition, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. & Ferguson, T.J. (2004) Virtue Ethics and the Practice of History: Native Americans and Archaeologists Along the San Pedro Valley of Arizona, Journal of Social Archaeology 4(1): 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Capron, A.M. (1999) Ethical and Human-rights Issues in Research on Mental Disorders that May Affect Decision-making Capacity, New England Journal of Medicine 340: 1430–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arras, John D. (1994) Principles and Particularity: The Role of Cases in Bioethics, Indiana Law Journal 69: 983–1014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beauchamp, Thomas L., & Childress, James F. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Fifth edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bebeau, M. (1994) Influencing the Moral Dimensions of Dental Practice, in Rest, J.R., & Narvaez, D., eds. Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 123–128.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hampshire, Stuart (1949) Fallacies in Moral Philosophy, Mind 58: 466–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Neill, Onora. (2001) Practical Principles and Practical Judgment, Hastings Center Report 31, No. 4: 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitbeck, Caroline (1995) Teaching Ethics to Scientists and Engineers: Moral Agents and Moral Problems, Science and Engineering Ethics, 1: (3) 299–308.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, Joshua (1993) Moral Pluralism and Moral Consensus in Copp, D., Hampton, J. & Roemer, J. E. eds. The Idea of Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonsen, A.R. & Toulmin, S. (1998) The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whitbeck, Caroline (1998) Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benjamin, M. (1990) Splitting the Difference: Compromise and Integrity in Ethics and Politics, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wong, D. (1992) Coping with Moral Ambiguity, Ethics 102: 763–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swazey, J. & Bird, S.J. (1997) Teaching and Learning Research Ethics, in Elliott, D., & Stern, J.E., eds., Research Ethics: A Reader, University Press of New England, Hanover, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pritchard, Michael S. (1998) Sidgwick’s Practical Ethics, International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12:2, pp. 147–151.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toulmin, S. (1981) The Tyranny of Principles, The Hastings Center Report, December, 1981: pp 31–39Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toulmin, S. (1982) How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 25: 736–750Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jonsen, A. (1986) Casuistry and Clinical Ethics, Theoretical Medicine 7: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arras, J. (1991) Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16: pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benjamin, M. (2001) Between Subway and Spaceship: Practical Ethics at the Outset of the Twenty-first Century Hastings Center Report 31, No. 4: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Little, M. (2001) On Knowing the ‘Why’: Particularism and Moral Theory; Hastings Center Report, 31: No. 4: 32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Callahan, D., & Bok, S., eds. (1980) Ethics Teaching in Higher Education, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schrag, B. (2002) Changing the Culture of Science: Teaching Research Ethics to Graduate Students and Post-doctoral Fellows. Monograph Series of the Center for the Study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University. Vol. XIV No. 3 April, 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schrag, B. ed. (1997–2005) Research Ethics: Cases and Commentaries, Vol 1–7, Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pimple, Kenneth D. (2005) Ethics at the Interface: A Successful Online Seminar, Commentary on “Some reflections on teaching health care ethics on the web” (T. Schonfeld), Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 481–494.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Woodburn, Laura (2002) Scientist and Subjects: An Internet-based seminar on the Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. Summary Process Evaluation: 2001–2002, October 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Association of Practical and Professional EthicsBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations