Skip to main content

Evil intent and design responsibility

Abstract

Mass casualty attacks in recent years have demonstrated the need to include “evil intent” as a design consideration. Three recent actual or potential weapons of mass destruction (WMD) attacks did not involve nuclear bombs or other devices designed as weapons, but rather benign objects used with evil intent. Just as unplanned events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and user misuse have been codified into design requirements based on the likelihood and potential impact of the event, “evil intent” has to become part of the design process for buildings, vehicles, equipment, and other items. The endstate should be reasonable additions to existing codes and standards such that it is clear what is and is not designed for. In the absence of specific design guidance, professionals with appropriate expertise can assess potential for “evil intent” and provide recommendations to design out or warn against this potential harm to public safety, particularly when codified requirements are not present.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Shigley, J.E. & Mitchell, L.D. (1983) Mechanical Engineering Design, 4 th Edition. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, NY, pp. 6–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), MIL-STD-882D Standard Practice for System Safety. 10 February 2000.

  3. Martin, M.W. & Schinzinger, R. (1989) Ethics in Engineering, 2 nd Edition. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, NY, pp. 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Louisiana Revised Statues 37:681–704 (2000), Chapter 8. Professional Engineering and Professional Surveying.

  5. ‘Lectric Law Library’s Lexicon, Definition of Intent. Retrieved June 27 from http://www.lectlaw.com/def/i053.htm.

  6. NOLO. “What Is A Crime,” Online Legal Encyclopedia. Retrieved June 27, 2003 from http://www.nolo.com.

  7. US Army Field Manual (FM) 3-0, Full Spectrum Operations, June 2001.

  8. US Federal Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 44, Section 921, Definitions.

  9. Barbarksky, R., Smith, H.T., Higgins, W., Newell, R., Herbelin, J. (2003, June) Consequences of Iraqi Use of Oil as a Defensive Weapon. National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC).

  10. CNN. (2003, December 27) China Seals Well After Leak. Retrieved 28 December 2003 from www.cnn.com.

  11. Oklahoma Department of Civil Emergency Management (ODCEM) (1996) After Action Report, Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Bombing.

  12. Corley, Gene W., P.E., S.E., Ph.D. Testimony on Security of Federal Buildings on Behalf of American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), before House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure (June 4, 1998).

  13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2002, May) World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations.

  14. Reuters. (2003, March 1) Khalid Sheikh Mohammet is Biggest A1 Qaeda Catch. KPBS News Room. Retrieved 27 June 2003 from http://www.kpbs.org.

  15. Andrews, J.D. & Moss, T.R. (2002) Reliability and Risk Assessment. ASME Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  16. US Army Technical Manual (TM) 5-853-1, Security Engineering Project Development. May 1994.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Kemper.

Additional information

Author Note: Bart Kemper, PE, is the principal engineer for Kemper Imageering, Inc. A significant portion of his work has been involved in industrial equipment design, product design, and the design and analysis of different security devices as well as performing simulations, computer modelling, reliability studies, blast analyses, and FMEA analyses on commercial equipment, including marine, offshore, and industrial facilities. He is also a US Army Reserve captain in the Corps of Engineers and was mobilized and deployed overseas in February 2003 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom as a member of the 412th Engineer Command, headquartered in Vicksburg, Mississippi. A significant portion of his duties involved reviewing intelligence, analyzing potential courses of action, and evaluating risks with regard to Iraqi and Coalition activities in the northern Iraqi oilfields as well as base camp design and infrastructure engineering. This paper is unclassified and has been cleared for publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemper, B. Evil intent and design responsibility. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 303–309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0026-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0026-4

Keywords

  • weapons of mass destruction (WMD)
  • explosion
  • public safety
  • disaster
  • attack
  • design responsibility