Abstract
We argue that considering only a few ‘big’ ethical decisions in any engineering design process — both in education and practice — only reinforces the mistaken idea of engineering design as a series of independent sub-problems. Using data collected in engineering design organisations over a seven year period, we show how an ethical component to engineering decisions is much more pervasive. We distinguish three types of ethical justification for engineering decisions: (1) consequential, (2) deontological or non-consequential, and (3) virtue-based. We find that although there is some evidence for engineering designers as ‘classic’ consequentialists, a more egocentric consequentialism would appear more fitting. We also explain how the idea of a ‘folk ethics’ — a justification in the second category that consciously weighs one thing with another — fits with the idea of the engineering design process as social negotiation rather than as technological progress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davis, M. (2001) The Professional Approach to Engineering Ethics: Five Research Questions. Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 379–390.
Culley, S., Duffy, A., McMahon, C. & Wallace, K. eds. (2001) Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 01). Institute of Mechanical Engineers, London.
Lindemann, U., Birkhofer, H., Meerkam, H. & Vajna, S. eds. (1999) Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference of Engineering Design (ICED 99). Technical University of Munich.
Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. (1996) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (second edition). Springer Verlag, London.
Pugh, S. (1991) Total Design. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.
Alexander, C. (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pritchard, M.S., Rabins, M.J. & Harris, C.E. (1995) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Wadsworth,
Unger, S.H. (2000) Examples of Real World Engineering Ethies Problems. Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 423–430.
Akin, Ö. (2001) Ethics in Architectural Design, in: Lloyd, P. & Christiaans, H., eds. Designing in Context. Delft University Press, Delft: 45–61.
Robison, W., Boisjoly, R., Hoeker, D. & Young, S. (2002) Representation and Misrepresentation: Tufte and the Morton Thiokol Engineers on the Challenger. Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 59–81.
Pritchard, M.S. (2001) Responsible Engineering: The Importance of Character and Imagination. Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 391–402.
Hales, C. (1997) Forensic Analysis of the Engineering Design Process, in: Frankenberger, E., Badke-Schaub, P. & Birkhofer, H., eds. Designers: The Key to Successful Product Development. Springer, London: 137–149.
Davis, M. (1997) Better Communication between Engineers and Managers. Science and Engineering Ethics 3: 171–212.
Whitbeck, C. (1997) What Can We Learn From ‘Better Communication between Engineers and Managers’? Science and Engineering Ethics 3: 267–270.
Scruton, R. (1979) The Aesthetics of Architecture. Methuen, London, UK.
Vincenti, W.G. (1990) What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Simon, H.A. (1995) Problem Forming, Problem Finding, and Problem Solving in Design, in: Collen, A. & Gasparski, W.W., eds. Designs and Systems. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, US:
Herkert, J. (2001) Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 403–414.
Baron, J. (1994) Non-Consequentialist Decisions. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 17: 1–10.
Lloyd, P. (2002) Making a Drama Out of a Process: How Television Represents Designing. Design Studies 22: 113–133.
Lloyd, P. (2000) Storytelling and the Development of Discourse in the Engineering Design Process. Design Studies 24: 357–373.
Busby, J. & Lloyd, P. (1999) Influences on Solution Search Processes in Design Organisations. Research in Engineering Design 11: 158–171.
Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994) Designing Engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il.
Pritchard, M.S. (2001) Responsible Engineering: The Importance of Character and Imagination. Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 391–402.
Lloyd, P. & Busby, J. (2001) Softening Up the Facts: Engineers in Design Meetings. Design Issues 17: 67–82.
Wijdeveld, P. (2000) Ludwig Wittgenstein: Architect (second edition). Pepin Press, Amsterdam.
Bucciarelli, L. (2001) Designing and Learning: A Disjunction in Contexts, in: Lloyd, P. & Christiaans, H., eds. Designing in Context. Delft University Press, Delft: 411–424.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lloyd, P., Busby, J. “Things that went well — No serious injuries or deaths”: Ethical reasoning in a normal engineering design process. SCI ENG ETHICS 9, 503–516 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0047-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0047-4