Abstract
This paper examines Romanian bioethics regulations for biomedical sciences, looking in particular at the genetics area as a source for conflict of interest. The analysis is focused on the organizational level, national regulations, the sources for generating conflicts of interest, and management of conflicts.
Modern biotechnology and gene technology are among the key technologies of the twenty-first century. The application of gene technology for medical and pharmaceutical purposes is widely accepted by society, but the same cannot be said of the development and application of gene technology in agriculture and food processing. Because the use of a technology in the production and processing of food is regarded more sceptically than in the production of biomedical products, there can be areas of conflict in many cases when communication is undertaken about gene technology in the agro-food sector. Ethical concerns play an important factor in this, but a society’s attitude to a developing technology is an amalgam of many effects which are beyond ethics as such.
This paper contains a study carried out by the author for the Romanian Association for Consumer Protection about the attitudes of consumers towards genetically modified (GM) foods. This study revealed that in Romania more than 98% of consumers did not know anything about GM foods and frequently were confused about the definitions of these terms.
In conclusion, it is necessary to say that there is a low level of knowledge regarding biotechnology in Romania and this is an important reason why there is neither public acceptance of gene technology products nor is there a rejection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stern P. & Fineberg H. (1996) (editors) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, Committee on Risk Characterization, National Research Council (USA), National Academy Press, USA.
Urgent Decree 152/1999, published in Monitorul Oficial, part 1(Romania), nr. 11, 13th January 2000.
Romanian Orthodox Church, web site: http://www.patriarhia.ro
Law 74/1995 with modifications, published by Monitorul Oficial (Romania), part 1, nr. 560, 10 November 2000.
Law 2/1998, published in Monitorul Oficial (Romania), nr. 8, January 1998.
Aristide Popescu (2001) Scandals of eye transplant, Viata medicala, nr. 43 (October) 26: 1.
Emergency Ordinance 37/2002, published in Monitorul Oficial (Romania), part 1, 2 February 2002.
European Federation of Biotechnology (2001) Report of Advanced Workshop on Embryo Research, Brussels.
Simona, Gheorghe (27 August 2001) A 56 years old woman will give life from the test tube. Cotidianul (newspaper) nr. 291, p. 3.
Ispas, Ioana (February 2000) Toward the Romanian legislation for labeling GM foods, Consumer 21: 7.
Brown, L.R. (ed) (1997) State of the world. Worldwatch Institute, Washington D.C.; Norkutgave, Jodens tilstand.H.Aschehong@Co.(W.Nygaard), Oslo (ISBN 83-03-22190-4).
Rissler J. & Mellon M. (1996) The ecological risks of engineered crops, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The United Nations Conference on Environment and development (3–14 June 1992), Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.
World Trade Organization (1998) Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Article 5 (2,7).
European Commission-Directorate General XXIV (1998) Consumer Policy and Consumer Health Protection-Guidelines on the Application of the Precautionary Principle.
Cameron J. & Abouchar J. (1991). The precautionary principle, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review XIV: 1–28.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1993) Safety evaluation of foods derivated by modern biotechnology: concept and principles, OECD, Paris.
Regulation EC/95 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Novel Foods and Food Ingredients, Article 3.4, 8.1.
Millstone E., Brunner E. & Mayer S. (1999) Beyond substantial equivalence, Nature 401: 525–526.
Bredahl L. (2001) Determination of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods: Results of a cross national survey, Journal of Consumer Policy 24: 23–61.
Our food, whose choice? Consumers take action on GM foods (2000) (leaflet edited by Consumers International for World Consumer Rights Day 2000), Consumers International: 13.
Ispas, Ioana and Dodu, Alexandru (May–June 2001) The labelling of foods: the results of the consumer’s test, The Voice of Consumer (Romania): 6–7.
Menrad K., Koschatzky K., et al (1998) A guide for companies in the agro-food sector to communicate on genetic engineering to the Public, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Ioana Ispas, MD in Molecular Biology, is a scientific researcher and Member of the Romanian Association for Consumer Protection, NCP for FP5-Quality of life and management of living resources.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ispas, I. Conflict of interest from a Romanian geneticist’s perspective. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 363–381 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0056-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0056-8