Abstract
The article evaluates the distribution of income mobility in Germany. We employ official data from the German Federal Employment Agency and compare relative changes in income and their serial dependency over time during the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s to obtain both a cross-sectional and a longitudinal perspective with an intra-generational focus. The data set is separated with respect to the education of the individuals and job changes. Nonparametric smoothing techniques are applied for the modelling of the multivariate distribution of individual income. We detect very low income mobility for the low-educated workforce but significantly higher income mobility for highly educated individuals.
Zusammenfassung
Der Artikel analysiert die Verteilung von Einkommensmobilität in Deutschland. Wir verwenden die offiziellen Daten der Deutschen Bundesagentur für Arbeit und vergleichen relative Einkommensveränderungen und ihre seriellen Abhängigkeiten über die Zeit in den Jahrzehnten 1980, 1990 und 2000 um eine Querschnitts- und eine Längsperspektive mit einem Fokus auf Veränderungen innerhalb der Generationen zu erhalten. Die Daten werden in Bezug auf die Erziehung der Einzelpersonen und für Änderungen der Beschäftigung getrennt. Für die Modellierung der multivariaten Verteilung des individuellen Einkommens werden nichtparametrische Glättungstechniken angewandt. Als Ergebnis erkennen wir sehr niedrige Einkommensmobilität für die gering ausgebildeten Arbeitskräfte, aber deutlich höhere Einkommensmobilität für die hochgebildeten Personen.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Therefore, we do not present the graphical results of the parametric approach.
References
Agency GFE (2015) Sample of integrated labour market biographies (siab). http://fdz.iab.de/en/FDZ_Individual_Data/integrated_labour_market_biographies.aspx. Accessed 01.03.2016
Bedford T, Cooke RM (2002) Vines: a new graphical model for dependent random variables. Ann Stat 30(4):1031–1068
Bowlus A, Robin J-M (2012) An international comparison of lifetime inequalilty: How continental europe resembles North America. J Eur Econ Assoc 10(6):1236–1262
Chau TW (2009) Estimating mobility and lifetime inequality of labor income in the united states and germany using extensions of the copula approach. In: T. W. Chau (Eds.), Essays on earnings mobility within and across generations using copula. University of Rochester, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: 1–49
Czado C (2010) Pair-copula constructions of multivariate copulas. In: Bickel P, Diggle P, Fienberg S, Gather U, Olkin I, Zeger S, Jaworski P, Durante F, Härdle WK, Rychlik T (eds) Copula theory and its applications. Lecture notes in statistics, vol 198. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 93–109
de Boor C (1978) A practical guide to splines. Springer, Berlin
Derumigny A, Fermanian J-D (2017) About tests of the ‘‘simplifying’’ assumption for conditional copulas. ArXiv e‑prints.
Eilers PHC, Marx BD (1996) Flexible smoothing with B‑splines and penalties. Stat Sci 11(2):89–121
Flinn C (2002) Labour market structure and inequality: a comparison of italy and the U.S. Rev Econ Stud 69:611–645
Gijbels I, Omelka M, Veraverbeke N (2017) Nonparametric testing for no covariate effects in conditional copulas. Statistics (Ber) 51(3):475–509
Härdle W, Okhrin O (2009) De copulis non est disputandum – copulae: an overview. AStA Adv Stat Anal 94(1):1–31
Jäntti M, Jenkins SP (2015) Chapter 10 – income mobility. In: Atkinson AB, Bourguignon F (eds) Handbook of income distribution, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 807–935
Jaworski P, Durante F, Härdle W, Rychlik T (2010) Copula theory and its applications. Lecture notes in statistics, vol. 198. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (Proceedings)
Joe H (1996) Families of m‑variate distributions with given margins and m(m-1)/2 bivariate dependence parameters. In: Rüschendorf L, Schweizer B, Taylor M (eds) Distributions with fixed marginals and related topics, vol 28. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, pp 120–141
Kauermann G, Schellhase C (2014) Flexible pair-copula estimation in D‑vines with penalized splines. Stat Comput 24(6):1081–1100
Kolev N, Anjos U, Mendes B (2006) Copulas: a review and recent developments. Stoch Models 22(4):617–660
Kurz MS (2017) pacotest: testing for partial copulas and the simplifying assumption in vine copulas. R package version 0.2
Kurz MS, Spanhel F (2016) Testing the simplifying assumption in high-dimensional vine copulas. Dependence Modeling in Finance, Insurance and Environmental Science, Munich, 17.–19. May, pp 17–19
Lemieux T, MacLeod WB, Parent D (2009) Performance pay and wage inequality. Q J Econ 124(1):1–49
Lorentz G (1953) Bernstein polynomials. Mathematical Expositions, no. 8. Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto
McNeil A, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management. Princeton Series in Finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Nagler T, Czado C (2016) Evading the curse of dimensionality in nonparametric density estimation with simplified vine copulas. J Multivar Anal 151:69–89
Nagler T, Schellhase C, Czado C (2017) Nonparametric estimation of simplified vines: comparison of methods. Depend Model. doi:10.1515/demo-2017-0007
Nelsen R (2006) An introduction to copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rank J (ed) (2007) Copulas. Risk Books, London
Rivlin T (1969) An introduction to the approximation of functions. Blaisdell Publishing, Ginn & Co, Waltham
Sawhill IV, Morton JE (2007) Economic mobility: is the American dream alive and well? The brookings institution. Report of the Economic Mobility Project.
Schellhase C (2015) penDvine: flexible pair-copula estimation in D‑vines using bivariate penalized splines. R package version 0.2.4..
Schellhase C (2016) pendensity: density estimation and comparison with a penalized mixture approach. R package version 0.2.11.
Schellhase C, Kauermann G (2012) Density estimation and comparison with a penalized mixture approach. Comput Stat 27(4):757–777
Schellhase C, Spanhel F (2017) Estimating non-simplified vine copulas using penalized splines. Stat Comput :1–23. doi:10.1007/s11222-017-9737-7
Schepsmeier U, Brechmann EC (2015) CDVine: statistical inference of C‑ and D‑vine copulas. R package version 1.4.
Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges vol. 8. Institut Statistique de l’Université de Paris, Paris, pp 229–231
Smith M, Min A, Almeida C, Czado C (2010) Modeling longitudinal data using a pair-copula construction decomposition of serial dependence. J Am Stat Assoc 105:1467–1479
Spanhel F, Kurz MS (2015) Simplified vine copula models: approximations based on the simplifying assumption. ArXiv e‑prints.
vom Berge P, König M, Seth S (2013) Sample of integrated labour market biographies (SIAB) 1975–2010. FDZ-Datenreport, 01/2013 (en). Documentation of labour market data
Wahba G (1990) Spline models for observational data. SIAM, Philadelphia
Nagler T, Schellhase C, Czado C (2017) Nonparametric estimation of simplified vines: comparison of methods. Depend Model 5(1):99–120
Kurz MS, Spanhel F (2017) Testing the simplifying assumption in high-dimensional vine copulas. ArXiv e‑prints https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02338
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schellhase, C., Kuhlenkasper, T. Semi-parametric estimation of income mobility with D‑vines using bivariate penalised splines. AStA Wirtsch Sozialstat Arch 11, 107–134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-017-0205-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-017-0205-9
Keywords
- Intra-generational income mobility
- Copula density estimation
- Changes of income
- Penalised spline smoothing
- Vine copula