Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complex regional pain syndrome—reflex sympathetic dystrophy

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

  • Complex regional pain syndrome-reflex sympathetic dystrophy (CRPS/RSD) is complex pain-dysfunction syndrome of unknown cause that typically affects a single extremity. Changes are usually more marked peripherally. There are no generally accepted clinical diagnostic criteria or laboratory studies for CRPS/ RSD; our current state of knowledge allows the diagnosis to be made only on clinical grounds. Clinical suspicion should be raised if pain and disability are greater than would usually be expected as a result of the original incident, if recovery is slower than expected, and if autonomic changes are prominent in the affected extremity. The pain associated with the condition may be sympathetically maintained, sympathetically independent, or both.

  • No evidence-based treatment regimens for CRPS/RSD are available. Treatment of the individual patient is empiric and uses symptomatic techniques that seem logical o r that have been proven to be effective in other conditions. The sympathetic nervous system makes an unknown contribution to CRPS/RSD, but it is not known whether this is a cause or an effect of the pain. Psychological and psychiatric changes are probably secondary rather than etiologic.

  • Treatment should be immediate, aggressive, and directed toward restoration of full function of the extremity. Various analgesic techniques may be necessary to permit the patient to comply with the rehabilitation program. This program is best carried out in a comprehensive interdisciplinary setting, with a primary emphasis on functional restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Jänig W: The puzzle of “reflex sympathetic dystrophy”: mechanisms, hypotheses, open questions. In Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy: A Reappraisal. Edited by Jänig W, Stanton-Hicks M. Seattle: IASP Press; 1996:1–24. Jänig summarizes the literature on reflex sympathetic dystrophy in animals and in humans and indicates the areas that are scientifically based and those that are still speculative. He reviews the concepts surrounding the involvement of the sympathetic system in disease states and the interaction between the sympathetic and somatosensory systems.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Merskey H, Bogduk N: Classification of Chronic Pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. These statements are the result of the consensus of various groups within the International Association for the Study of Pain and its Special Interest Group on Pain and the Sympathetic Nervous System. It was not possible to base these comments on published scientific evidence. The absence of validated (or even accepted unvalidated) diagnostic criteria means that most papers on reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) published before this taxonomy was developed must be considered anecdotal; definitions of RSD seem to have been determined by each author. Such studies usually open with the statement “…n patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy were given treatment x.” Usually, no information is given about inclusion or exclusion criteria, controls, or objective outcome measures. Some studies use the circular argument that RSD was diagnosed by using the criterion being studied (eg, appearance of a three-phase bone scan or response to sympathetic blockade). No data are available on the durability of outcomes. It is notable that most published studies show success rates of 60% to 100%. For these reasons, meta-analyses of treatments have not been possible. Current expert opinions may therefore be a guide to clinicians.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galer BS, Bruehl S, Harden RN: IASP diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome: a preliminary empirical validation study. Clin J Pain 1998, 14:48–54. This study compared 18 consecutive patients with complex regional pain syndrome with 30 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The authors believe that the diagnostic criteria of the International Association for the Study of Pain may lead to overdiagnosis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandroni P, Low PA, Ferrer T, et al.: Complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I): prospective study and laboratory evaluation. Clin J Pain 1998, 14:282–289. These authors prospectively studied 102 patients who were referred with a putative diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome. They conclude that clinical and laboratory probability scores correlate in an internally consistent manner.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanton-Hicks M, Baron R, Boas R, et al.: Consensus report. Complex regional pain syndromes: guidelines for therapy. Clin J Pain 1998, 14:155–166. This consensus report summarizes a conference convened to define appropriate therapies for complex regional pain syndrome. Too few data are available to allow recommendations to be based on published material, so these guidelines represent clinical impressions.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Raja SN, Treede RD, Davis KD, et al.: Systemic alpha-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine: a diagnostic test for sympathetically maintained pain. Anesthesiology 1991, 74:691–698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Muizelaar JP, Kleyer M, Hertogs IA, et al.: Complex regional pain syndrome (reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia): management with the calcium channel blocker nifedipine and/or the alphasympathetic blocker phenoxybenzamine in 59 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1997, 99:26–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jadad AR, Caroll D, Glynn CJ: Intravenous regional sympathetic blockade for pain relief in reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a systematic review and double-blind cross-over study. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995, 10:13–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassenbusch S, Stanton-Hicks M, Covington EC, et al.: Long-term intraspinal infusions of opioids in the treatment of neuropathic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995, 10:527–543.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barolat G, Schwartzman R, Woo R: Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1989, 53:40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassenbusch S, Stanton-Hicks M, Schoppa D, et al.: Long-term results of peripheral nerve stimulation for reflex sympathetic dystrophy. J Neurosurg 1996, 84:415–423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baron R, Maier C: Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: skin blood flow, sympathetic vasoconstrictor reflexes and pain before and after surgical sympathectomy. Pain 1996, 67:317–326. Two of 12 patients had long-term relief of hand pain.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bengston K: Physical modalities for complex regional pain syndrome. Hand Clin 1997, 13:443–454.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ciccone DS, Bandilla EB, Wu W: Psychological dysfunction in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Pain 1997, 71:323–333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, P.R. Complex regional pain syndrome—reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 1, 466–472 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-996-0010-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-996-0010-1

Keywords

Navigation