Skip to main content
Log in

Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Epilepsy

  • Epilepsy (E Waterhouse, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Neuromodulation devices are used in the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy. This has been defined as epilepsy with persistent seizures despite adequate trials of at least two anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). In most cases of medically refractory partial epilepsy, the first choice of treatment is resective surgery if the seizure focus can be definitively localized and if surgery can be safely performed without causing intolerable neurologic deficits. Patients with medically refractory epilepsy who are not candidates for potentially curative surgery may benefit from the implantation of a neuromodulation device. While most of these devices require surgical implantation, they provide a significant added seizure reduction without typical medication side effects. Furthermore, the efficacy of these devices continues to improve over years. There are currently no head-to-head trials comparing the different neuromodulation devices but efficacy appears to be roughly similar. The choice of device therefore depends on the type of epilepsy, whether the seizure focus can be identified, and other clinical factors. Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS) does not require identification of the seizure focus and also carries an FDA indication for depression. While in the United States VNS is only approved for use in partial epilepsy, it is commonly used off-label to treat generalized seizures as well. VNS delivers stimulation on a scheduled basis, in response to patient activation, or in response to heart rate increases serving as a proxy for seizures. Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) requires the identification of up to two seizure foci and delivers stimulation only in response to the detection of epileptiform activity. While it requires intracranial placement of electrodes, it allows for long-term monitoring of electrographic seizures and may be effective where VNS has not produced an optimal response. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus is not FDA approved at this time but is available in Europe and many other parts of the world. While it also carries an indication only for partial epilepsy, it does not require identification of the seizure focus and may be particularly helpful for temporal lobe epilepsy. It also appears effective in cases where VNS has not been sufficiently helpful. The Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (TNS) system is another treatment modality which is not yet FDA approved but is available in Europe and other countries. Its mechanism of action is similar to the VNS system and it also appears to have anti-depression effects in addition to anti-epileptic benefits. However, the most compelling feature of TNS is that it is not implanted but rather applied to the skin with transdermal electrodes, typically at night.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, Mohamed M, Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How common are the “common” neurologic disorders? Neurology. 2007;68:326–37. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252807.38124.a3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:314–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM200002033420503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Surges R, Sander JW. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: mechanisms, prevalence, and prevention. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25(2):201–7. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283506714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M, Group E and E of S for TLES. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:311–8. doi:10.1056/NEJM200108023450501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Engel J, McDermott MP, Wiebe S, et al. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:922–30. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.220. Recent study demonstrating the need for early identification of medically refractory epilepsy and surgical intervention.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):899–908. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morrell MJ. Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2011;77(13):1295–304. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182302056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Handforth A, DeGiorgio CM, Schachter SC, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures: a randomized active-control trial. vol 51. 1998. doi: 10.1212/WNL.51.1.48.

  9. Bergey GK, Morrell MJ, Mizrahi EM, et al. Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures. Neurology. 2015;84:810–7. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001280. The most recent long-term follow-up update of the responsive neurostimulation cohort from the feasibility and pivotal trials.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2015;84:1017–25. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001334. The most recent long-term follow-up update of the stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (SANTE) cohort from the Phase III trial.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliott RE, Morsi A, Kalhorn SP, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in 436 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: long-term outcomes and predictors of response. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20(1):57–63. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meador KJ, Kapur R, Loring DW, Kanner AM, Morrell MJ. Quality of life and mood in patients with medically intractable epilepsy treated with targeted responsive neurostimulation. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;45:242–7. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.01.012. Study showing improvement in quality of life measures in patients undergoing responsive neurostimulation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris GL, Gloss D, Buchhalter J, Mack KJ, Nickels K, Harden C. Evidence-based guideline update: vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: Report of the guideline development subcommittee of the american academy of neurology. Neurology. 2013;81(16):1453–9. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a393d1. Review providing evidence-based guidelines in the use of VNS.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heck C, Helmers SL, DeGiorgio CM. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy, epilepsy, and device parameters: scientific basis and recommendations for use. Neurology. 2002;59(6 Suppl 4):S31–7. doi:10.1212/WNL.59.6_suppl_4.S31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris GL, Mueller WM. Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. the Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group E01-E05. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1731–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elliott RE, Morsi A, Tanweer O, et al. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation over time: review of 65 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS >10 years. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20(3):478–83. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soss J, Heck C, Murray D, et al. A prospective long-term study of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;42:44–7. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.10.029. Prospective long-term study of trigeminal nerve stimulation consiting of patient who completed Phase II trial.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

George Nune reports research support without any direct financial benefits from Neuropace Inc. and Cyberonics Inc. during the conduct of the study.

Christopher DeGiorgio was previously an employee of Neurosigma Inc. and co-owns relevant patents from which he has received royalties.

Christianne Heck reports non-financial support and other research support from Neuropace Inc and other support from NeuroSigma during the conduct of the study.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Nune MD.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Epilepsy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nune, G., DeGiorgio, C. & Heck, C. Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Epilepsy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17, 43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-015-0375-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-015-0375-0

Keywords

Navigation