Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rehabilitation and recovery after stroke

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

  • Many poststroke complications are preventable.

  • There are few data comparing the efficacy of specific, standard physiotherapeutic approaches with each other or with the incidence of spontaneous recovery.

  • More intensive physiotherapeutic approaches may be of benefit, but the available data are inconclusive.

  • Innovative physiotherapeutic approaches, such as robot training and forced-use therapy, are promising but require further study.

  • Certain classes of drugs affecting central neurotransmitters (eg, a2-adrenergic receptor agonists, a1-adrenergic receptor antagonists, haloperidol, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and benzodiazepines) may interfere with recovery and should be avoided if possible until definitive data become available. Pharmacotherapy to improve poststroke recovery remains experimental.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donnelly MT, et al.: A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. BMJ 1996, 312:13–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett JG, Breiman RF, Mandell LA, File TM: Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. The Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 1998, 26:811–838. Thorough review and guidelines for the management of aspiration and other community-acquired pneumonias.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Warren JW: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997, 11:609–622. Review of prevention and management of urinary tract infections in catheterized patients.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyai I, Reding M: Antidepressant effects on recovery. In Restorative Neurology: Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Recovery After Stroke. Edited by Goldstein LB. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kottke FJ: The effects of limitation of activity upon the human body. JAMA 1966, 196:825–830.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gubitz G, Counsell C, Sandercock P, Signorini D: Anticoagulants for acute ischemic stroke. http:// hiru.mcmaster.ca/cochrane/cochrane/revabstr/ ab000024.htm. Meta-analysis and review of the use of anticoagulants in the setting of acute stroke, including specific information related to prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus.

  7. Young RR, Delwaide PJ: Drug therapy: spasticity. N Engl J Med 1981, 304:28–33, 96–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Duncan PW: Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997, 3:1–20. Excellent comprehensive review of the impact of physical therapeutic interventions on poststroke recovery.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robey R: The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis. Brain Lang 1994, 47:582–608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes SH, Carroll SR: Early intervention care in the acute stroke patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986, 67:319–321.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP, et al.: The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke 1985, 16:928–931.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley EL, et al.: Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992, 55:530–535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD: Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999, 30:573–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bornstein NM, Bova IY, Korczyn AD: Infections as triggering factors for ischemic stroke. Neurology 1997, 49(suppl 4):S45-S46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, et al.: Functional electrical stimulation in post-stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. In Center for Health Economics Research: Post-stroke Rehabilitation Guideline Technical Report. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K-H: Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995, 130:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wijdicks EFM, St.Louis E: Clinical profiles predictive of outcome in pontine hemorrhage. Neurology 1997, 49:1342–1346.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE: A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 1998, 29:1122–1128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al.: Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993, 74:347–354.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. GoldsteinLB: Potential effects of common drugs on stroke recovery. Arch Neurol 1998, 55:454–456. Brief review of potential drug effects on poststroke recovery.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldstein, L.B. Rehabilitation and recovery after stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2, 319–328 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0049-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0049-3

Keywords

Navigation