Opinion statement
-
Many poststroke complications are preventable.
-
There are few data comparing the efficacy of specific, standard physiotherapeutic approaches with each other or with the incidence of spontaneous recovery.
-
More intensive physiotherapeutic approaches may be of benefit, but the available data are inconclusive.
-
Innovative physiotherapeutic approaches, such as robot training and forced-use therapy, are promising but require further study.
-
Certain classes of drugs affecting central neurotransmitters (eg, a2-adrenergic receptor agonists, a1-adrenergic receptor antagonists, haloperidol, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and benzodiazepines) may interfere with recovery and should be avoided if possible until definitive data become available. Pharmacotherapy to improve poststroke recovery remains experimental.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donnelly MT, et al.: A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. BMJ 1996, 312:13–16.
Bartlett JG, Breiman RF, Mandell LA, File TM: Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. The Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 1998, 26:811–838. Thorough review and guidelines for the management of aspiration and other community-acquired pneumonias.
Warren JW: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997, 11:609–622. Review of prevention and management of urinary tract infections in catheterized patients.
Miyai I, Reding M: Antidepressant effects on recovery. In Restorative Neurology: Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Recovery After Stroke. Edited by Goldstein LB. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Company; 1998.
Kottke FJ: The effects of limitation of activity upon the human body. JAMA 1966, 196:825–830.
Gubitz G, Counsell C, Sandercock P, Signorini D: Anticoagulants for acute ischemic stroke. http:// hiru.mcmaster.ca/cochrane/cochrane/revabstr/ ab000024.htm. Meta-analysis and review of the use of anticoagulants in the setting of acute stroke, including specific information related to prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus.
Young RR, Delwaide PJ: Drug therapy: spasticity. N Engl J Med 1981, 304:28–33, 96–99.
Duncan PW: Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997, 3:1–20. Excellent comprehensive review of the impact of physical therapeutic interventions on poststroke recovery.
Robey R: The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis. Brain Lang 1994, 47:582–608.
Hayes SH, Carroll SR: Early intervention care in the acute stroke patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986, 67:319–321.
Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP, et al.: The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke 1985, 16:928–931.
Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley EL, et al.: Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992, 55:530–535.
Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD: Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999, 30:573–579.
Bornstein NM, Bova IY, Korczyn AD: Infections as triggering factors for ischemic stroke. Neurology 1997, 49(suppl 4):S45-S46.
Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, et al.: Functional electrical stimulation in post-stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. In Center for Health Economics Research: Post-stroke Rehabilitation Guideline Technical Report. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health; 1995.
Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K-H: Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995, 130:59–68.
Wijdicks EFM, St.Louis E: Clinical profiles predictive of outcome in pontine hemorrhage. Neurology 1997, 49:1342–1346.
Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE: A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 1998, 29:1122–1128.
Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al.: Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993, 74:347–354.
GoldsteinLB: Potential effects of common drugs on stroke recovery. Arch Neurol 1998, 55:454–456. Brief review of potential drug effects on poststroke recovery.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldstein, L.B. Rehabilitation and recovery after stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2, 319–328 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0049-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0049-3