Advertisement

2007–2019: a “Third”-Space Odyssey in the Endoscopic Management of Gastrointestinal Tract Diseases

  • Anastassios C. Manolakis
  • Haruhiro InoueEmail author
  • Akiko Ueno
  • Yuto Shimamura
Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Endoscopy

Abstract

Purpose of review

The main scope of this review article is to introduce readers to the innovative field of third-space endoscopy and offer a closer look at its history, milestones, and procedure spectrum while discussing ongoing and future challenges arising from its increasing adoption worldwide.

Recent findings

Over the past few years, third-space endoscopy has been utilized in various diagnostic and interventional procedures performed throughout the gastrointestinal tract: obliteration of Zenker’s diverticulum, myotomy for achalasia, gastroparesis or Hirschsprung’s disease, biopsy or removal of subepithelial tumors, stricture management, post-per-oral endoscopic myotomy endoscopic fundoplication, and mediastino-, thoraco-, and peritoneoscopy.

Summary

Third-space endoscopic interventions have revolutionized the management of esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis, and gastrointestinal tract subepithelial tumors. Despite the high efficacy and safety of such interventions, some common (e.g., the high level of necessary endoscopic skill) and unique for each procedure (e.g., post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux or poor outcomes in patient subgroups) challenges still remain. Through a dedicated endoscopic training, a rigorous pre-procedure patient evaluation and selection, and the application of modified or new techniques, challenges can be overcome thus establishing existing procedures and paving the way for additional breakthroughs in the field of third-space endoscopy.

Keywords

Third-space endoscopy Gastrointestinal tract Submucosal tunnel Per-oral endoscopic myotomy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Inoue H is an advisor of and receives educational grants from Olympus Corporation and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, and is an advisor of Top Corporation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Haruhiro Inoue reports grants from Olympus Corporation and other funds from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company and Top Corporation. Manolakis AC is a Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology grant holder. Yuto Shimamura declares that he has no conflict of interest. Akiko Ueno declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Morgenthal CB, Richards WO, Dunkin BJ, Forde KA, Vitale G, Lin E, et al. The role of the surgeon in the evolution of flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:838–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maydeo A, Dhir V. Third-space endoscopy: stretching the limits. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:728–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Marler RJ. Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:688–94.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy. 2007;39:761–4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:265–71.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khashab MA, Pasricha PJ. Conquering the third space: challenges and opportunities for diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:146–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu BR, Song JT. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and other novel applications of submucosal tunneling in humans. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2016;26:271–82.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishaq S, Sultan H, Siau K, Kuwai T, Mulder CJ, Neumann H. New and emerging techniques for endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: state-of-the-art review. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:449–60.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khoury T, Mizrahi M, Mahamid M, Daher S, Nadella D, Hazou W, et al. State of the art review with literature summary on gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for gastroparesis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:1829–33.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bapaye A, Wagholikar G, Jog S, Kothurkar A, Purandare S, Dubale N, et al. Per rectal endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of adult Hirschsprung’s disease: first human case (with video). Dig Endosc. 2016;28:680–4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lv XH, Wang CH, Xie Y. Efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:49–63.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Wagh MS, Yang D, Chavalitdhamrong D, Draganov PV. Per-oral endoscopic tunneling for restoration of the esophagus (POETRE). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:330 This method provides a new means for the treatment of critical esophageal stenosis using the submucosal tunnel as a new route bypassing the occluded part.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    • Inoue H, Ueno A, Shimamura Y, Manolakis A, Sharma A, Kono S, Nishimoto M, Sumi K, Ikeda H, Goda K, Onimaru M, Yamaguchi N, Itoh H. Peroral endoscopic myotomy and fundoplication: a novel NOTES procedure. Endoscopy (Accepted for publication). This is the first description of a new method for endoscopic fundoplication added to a per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) procedure so as to deal with the issue of gastroesophageal reflux after POEM.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bechara R, Onimaru M, Ikeda H, Inoue H. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy, 1000 cases later: pearls, pitfalls, and practical considerations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:330–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minami H, Inoue H, Haji A, Isomoto H, Urabe S, Hashiguchi K, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: emerging indications and evolving techniques. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:175–81.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nabi Z, Nageshwar Reddy D, Ramchandani M. Recent advances in third-space endoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2018;14:224–32.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olliver JR, Wild CP, Sahay P, Dexter S, Hardie LJ. Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue and associated DNA damage in Barrett’s oesophagus. Lancet. 2003;362:373–4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Albers DV, Kondo A, Bernardo WM, Sakai P, Moura RN, Silva GL, et al. Endoscopic versus surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E678–86.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li LY, Yang YT, Qu CM, Liang SW, Zhong CQ, Wang XY, et al. Endoscopic needle-knife treatment for symptomatic esophageal Zenker’s diverticulum: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Dig Dis. 2018;19:204–14.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    • Li QL, Chen WF, Zhang XC, Cai MY, Zhang YQ, Hu JW, et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division: a novel technique for treating Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:1071–4 The technique described in this article, which is based on per-oral endoscopic myotomy principles, represents a novel method for the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brieau B, Leblanc S, Bordacahar B, Barret M, Coriat R, Prat F, et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division for Zenker’s diverticulum: a reproducible procedure for endoscopists who perform peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy. 2017;49:613–4.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hernández Mondragón OV, Solórzano Pineda MO, Blancas Valencia JM. Zenker’s diverticulum: submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division (Z-POEM). Dig Endosc. 2018;30:124.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Storm AC, Diehl DL, Griffith AS, Todd H, Baron TH, Khara HS, et al. Per oral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s is highly effective in patients who failed or were denied surgical treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(Suppl):AB628–9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cai M, Xu M, Li Q, Chen W, Zhu Y, Zhang D, et al. Preliminary results of submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division in the treatment of esophageal diverticulum. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017;20:530–4.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bapaye A. Third-space endoscopy - can we see light at the end of the tunnel? Endoscopy. 2018;50:1047–8.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang D, Draganov PV. Expanding role of third space endoscopy in the management of esophageal diseases. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018;16:41–57.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Werner YB, Rösch T. POEM and submucosal tunneling. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2016;14:163–77.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Song S, Itawi EA, Saber AA. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). J Investig Surg. 2009;22:214–7.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    DeMeester SR. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(Suppl 2):S130–4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stavropoulos SN, Modayil R, Friedel D. Per oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31:430–40.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Patel K, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Markar S, Kumar S, Jethwa P, Zaninotto G. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:807–19.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haito-Chavez Y, Inoue H, Beard KW, Draganov PV, Ujiki M, Rahden BHA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with per oral endoscopic myotomy in 1826 patients: an international multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1267–76.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Reddy DN, Darisetty S, Kotla R, Kalapala R, et al. Per oral endoscopic myotomy in children with achalasia cardia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22:613–9.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen YI, Inoue H, Ujiki M, Draganov PV, Colavita P, Mion F, et al. An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:956–61.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Talukdar R, Inoue H, Nageshwar Reddy D. Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3030–46.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ramchandani M, Nageshwar Reddy D, Nabi Z, Chavan R, Bapaye A, Bhatia S, et al. Management of achalasia cardia: expert consensus statements. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:1436–44.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, Rao GV, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: outcomes in over 400 consecutive patients. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E331–9.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ponds FA, Fockens P, Neuhaus H, Beyna T, Frieling T, Chiu P, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) versus pneumatic dilatation in therapy-naive patients with achalasia: results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(Suppl 1):S139.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1098–103.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013;154:893–7.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF, Arafat FO, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:228–35.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Banks M, Sweis R. POEM and the management of achalasia. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017;8:143–7.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khashab MA, Messallam AA, Onimaru M, Teitelbaum EN, Ujiki MB, Gitelis ME, et al. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1170–7.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Khan MA, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, Ismail A, Chen YI, Chavez YH, et al. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:35–44.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, Tandan M, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy in treatment-naïve achalasia patients versus prior treatment failure cases. Endoscopy. 2018;50:358–70.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang X, Modayil RJ, Friedel D, Gurram KC, Brathwaite CE, Taylor SI, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with or without prior Heller’s myotomy: comparing long-term outcomes in a large U.S. single-center cohort (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:972–85.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jones EL, Meara MP, Pittman MR, Hazey JW, Perry KA. Prior treatment does not influence the performance or early outcome of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1282–6.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kumbhari V, Khashab MA. Peroral endoscopic myotomy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7:496–509.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu ZQ, Li QL, Chen WF, Zhang XC, Wu QN, Cai MY, et al. The effect of prior treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy. 2018;51:307–16.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0658-5783.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sanaei O, Draganov P, Kunda R, Yang D, Khashab MA. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy. Endoscopy. 2018;51:342–5.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0656-5530.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, Costantini M, Ferguson MK, Pandolfino JE, et al. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus. 2018:31.  https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy071.
  52. 52.
    Inoue H, Shiwaku H, Iwakiri K, Onimaru M, Kobayashi Y, Minami H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:563–79.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ramchandani M, Nabi Z, Reddy DN, Talele R, Darisetty S, Kotla R, et al. Outcomes of anterior myotomy versus posterior myotomy during POEM: a randomized pilot study. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6:E190–8.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Li L, Chai N, Linghu E, Li Z, Du C, Zhang W, et al. Safety and efficacy of using a short tunnel versus a standard tunnel for peroral endoscopic myotomy for Ling type IIc and III achalasia: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6414-7.
  55. 55.
    Tan Y, Lv L, Wang X, Zhu H, Chu Y, Luo M, et al. Efficacy of anterior versus posterior per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia: a randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:46–54.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Li QL, Yao LQ, Xu XY, Zhu JY, Xu MD, Zhang YQ, et al. Repeat peroral endoscopic myotomy: a salvage option for persistent/recurrent symptoms. Endoscopy. 2016;48:134–40.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wang XH, Tan YY, Zhu HY, Li CJ, Liu DL. Full-thickness myotomy is associated with higher rate of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9419–26.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kumbhari V, Familiari P, Bjerregaard NC, Pioche M, Jones E, Ko WJ, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study. Endoscopy. 2017;49:634–42.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rösch T, Repici A, Boeckxstaens G. Will reflux kill POEM? Endoscopy. 2017;49:625–8.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tanaka S, Kawara F, Toyonaga T, Inoue H, Bechara R, Hoshi N, et al. Two penetrating vessels as a novel indicator of the appropriate distal end of peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:206–11.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Baldaque-Silva F, Marques M, Vilas-Boas F, Maia JD, Sá F, Macedo G. New transillumination auxiliary technique for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:544–5.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Grimes KL, Inoue H. Per oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a detailed description of the technique and review of the literature. Thorac Surg Clin. 2016;26:147–62.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hong HJ, Song GW, Ko WJ, Kim WH, Hahm KB, Hong SP, et al. Double-scope peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia: the first trial of a new double-scope POEM. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:383–6.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mou Y, Zeng H, Wang Q, Yi H, Liu W, Wen D, et al. Giant mid-esophageal diverticula successfully treated by per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:335–8.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wu C, Zhang Q, Liu W, Hu B. Successful treatment of giant esophageal diverticulum by per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy. 2018;50:E107–8.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yang J, Zeng X, Yuan X, Chang K, Sanaei O, Fayad L, et al. An international study on the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the management of esophageal diverticula: the first multicenter D-POEM experience. Endoscopy. 2018;51:346–9.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0759-1428.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kim SY, Kim KO. Management of gastric subepithelial tumors: the role of endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8:418–24.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Cohen C, Pop D, Icard P, Berthet JP, Venissac N, Mouroux J. Is there a place for thoracoscopic enucleation of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1670662.
  69. 69.
    Ikeda H, Inoue H. Peroral endoscopic submucosal tumor resection. Dig Endosc. 2018;30(Suppl 1):34–5.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Chiu PW, Inoue H, Rösch T. From POEM to POET: applications and perspectives for submucosal tunnel endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2016;48:1134–14.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Inoue H, Ikeda H, Hosoya T, Onimaru M, Yoshida A, Eleftheriadis N, et al. Submucosal endoscopic tumor resection for subepithelial tumors in the esophagus and cardia. Endoscopy. 2012;44:225–30.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chen T, Zhou PH, Chu Y, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, Ji Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Ann Surg. 2017;265:363–9.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Li QL, Chen WF, Zhang C, Hu JW, Zhou PH, Zhang YQ, et al. Clinical impact of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer (with video). Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3640–6.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cho JW, Korean ESD Study Group. Current guidelines in the management of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:235–40.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Cai MY, Zhu BQ, Xu MD, Qin WZ, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, et al. Submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumors: a novel endoscopic method for en bloc resection of predominant extraluminal growing subepithelial tumors or extra-gastrointestinal tumors (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:160–7.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chai N, Du C, Gao Y, Niu X, Zhai Y, Linghu E, et al. Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and video-assisted thoracoscopic enucleation for esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:3364–72.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wagh MS, Draganov PV. Per-oral endoscopic tunneling for restoration of the esophagus: a novel endoscopic submucosal dissection technique for therapy of complete esophageal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:722–7.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Gee DW, Willingham FF, Lauwers GY, Brugge WR, Rattner DW. Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy: a survival series in swine. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2117–22.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Willingham FF, Gee DW, Lauwers GY, Brugge WR, Rattner DW. Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1042–7.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Turner BG, Gee DW, Cizginer S, Kim MC, Mino-Kenudson M, Sylla P, et al. Endoscopic transesophageal mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection by using mediastinal and thoracic approaches (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:831–5.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Grund KE, Lehmann TG. Transesophageal NOTES--a critical analysis of relevant problems. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19:252–6.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Córdova H, Martinez-Pallí G, Fernández-Esparrach G. Feasibility of systematic transesophageal endoscopic mediastinoscopy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61:486–8.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Qin Z, Linghu EQ, Zhai YQ, Li H. Endoscopic transesophageal biopsy in the posterior mediastinum using submucosal tunneling technology and novel homemade instruments. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:1601–4.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Córdova H, Cubas G, Boada M, Rodríguez de Miguel C, Martínez-Pallí G, Gimferrer JM, et al. Adverse events of NOTES mediastinoscopy compared to conventional video-assisted mediastinoscopy: a randomized survival study in a porcine model. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E571–6.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kawai M, Peretta S, Burckhardt O, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J, Tanigawa N. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy: a new concept of minimally invasive surgery for pyloric stenosis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:169–73.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    • Khashab MA, Stein E, Clarke JO, Saxena P, Kumbhari V, Chander Roland B, et al. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: first human endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:764–8 The first human study exhibiting the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic pyloromyotomy in patients with gastroparesis.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kahaleh M, Gonzalez JM, Xu MM, Andalib I, Gaidhane M, Tyberg A, et al. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: a multicenter international experience. Endoscopy. 2018;50:1053–8.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jacques J, Legros R, Monteil J, Sautereau D, Gourcerol G. Outcomes and future directions of per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy: a view from France. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019;29:139–49.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Xu J, Chen T, Elkholy S, Xu M, Zhong Y, Zhang Y, et al. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) as a treatment for refractory gastroparesis: long-term outcomes. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:6409698.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gonzalez JM, Benezech A, Vitton V, Barthet M. G-POEM with antro-pyloromyotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: mid-term follow-up and factors predicting outcome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:364–70.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Xue HB, Fan HZ, Meng XM, Cristofaro S, Mekaroonkamol P, Dacha S, et al. Fluoroscopy-guided gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM): a more reliable and efficient method for treatment of refractory gastroparesis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4617–24.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Koul A, Dacha S, Mekaroonkamol P, Li X, Li L, Shahnavaz N, et al. Fluoroscopic gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) in patients with a failed gastric electrical stimulator. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018;6:122–6.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Dacha S, Mekaroonkamol P, Li L, Shahnavaz N, Sakaria S, Keilin S, et al. Outcomes and quality-of-life assessment after gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:282–9.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Stein B, Everhart KK, Lacy BE. Gastroparesis: a review of current diagnosis and treatment options. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:550–8.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tang DM, Friedenberg FK. Gastroparesis: approach, diagnostic evaluation, and management. Dis Mon. 2011;57:74–101.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hayakawa N, Nakamoto Y, Chen-Yoshikawa TF, Kido A, Ishimori T, Fujimoto K, et al. Gastric motility and emptying assessment by magnetic resonance imaging after lung transplantation: correlation with gastric emptying scintigraphy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:818–24.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Mekaroonkamol P, Dacha S, Patel V, Li B, Luo H, Shen S, et al. Outcomes of per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019;29:151–60.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    McCabe ME 4th, Dilly CK. New causes for the old problem of bile reflux gastritis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1389–92.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Farré R. Pathophysiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a role for mucosa integrity? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:783–99.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Kobara H, Mori H, Fujihara S, Nishiyama N, Tsutsui K, Masaki T. Gastric heterotopic pancreas can be identified by endoscopic direct imaging with submucosal endoscopy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013;22:345–8.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kobara H, Mori H, Fujihara S, Nishiyama N, Kobayashi M, Kamata H, et al. Bloc biopsy by using submucosal endoscopy with a mucosal flap method for gastric subepithelial tumor tissue sampling (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:141–5.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Chan SM, Wong TC, Lau JY, Ng EK. Direct incision versus submucosal tunneling as a method of creating transgastric accesses for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy: randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:281–7.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Lee SH, Kim SJ, Lee TH, Chung IK, Park SH, Kim EO, et al. Human applications of submucosal endoscopy under conscious sedation for pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3016–20.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Mortensen MB. Novel imaging strategies for upper gastrointestinal tract cancers. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;9:295–303.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Wang L, Cai Q, Fan C, Ren W, Yu J. Mo1628 a new potential method per anus endoscopic myotomy for treatment of internal anal sphincter achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:AB451.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Hu JW, Zhang C, Chen T, Zhou PH, Zhong YS, Zhang YQ, et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for the treatment of rectal submucosal tumors originating from the muscular propria layer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10(Suppl):281–6.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Takizawa K, Brahmbhatt R, Knipschield MA, Bingener J, Gostout CJ. Transcolonic peritoneoscopy by using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap for the detection of peritoneal bead targeting in the porcine survival model: a feasibility and effectiveness study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:127–34.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Wu QN, Xu XY, Zhang XC, Xu MD, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, et al. Submucosal fibrosis in achalasia patients is a rare cause of aborted peroral endoscopic myotomy procedures. Endoscopy. 2017;49:736–44.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Feng X, Linghu E, Chai N, Ding H. New endoscopic classification of esophageal mucosa in achalasia: a predictor for submucosal fibrosis. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:122–8.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Bechara R, Woo M, Hookey L, Chung W, Grimes K, Onimaru M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for complex achalasia and the POEM difficulty score. Dig Endosc. 2018;31:148–55.  https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13294.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Nabi Z, Reddy DN, Ramchandani M. Adverse events during and after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: prevention, diagnosis, and management. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:4–17.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Song S, Wang X, Zhang S, Li Y, Zhang X, Chu X. Efficacy and complications of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors and exploration for influencing factors. Z Gastroenterol. 2018;56:365–73.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Jain D, Desai A, Mahmood E, Singhal S. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal tract tumors arising from muscularis propria. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30:262–72.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Du C, Linghu E. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:2100–9.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Jacques J, Pagnon L, Hure F, Legros R, Crepin S, Fauchais AL, et al. Peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy is efficacious and safe for refractory gastroparesis: prospective trial with assessment of pyloric function. Endoscopy. 2018;51:40–9.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0628-6639.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Albers D, Frieling T, Dakkak D, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Töx U, Gittinger M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is effective in treatment of noncardiac chest pain caused by hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders: results of the POEM-HYPE-study. Z Gastroenterol. 2018;56:1337–42.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    • Huh CW, Youn YH, Chung H, Lee YC, Park H. Functional restoration of the esophagus after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178414 An important study documenting favorable functional restoration of the esophagus after per-oral endoscopic myotomy.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kumta NA, Mehta S, Kedia P, Weaver K, Sharaiha RZ, Fukami N, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: establishing a new program. Clin Endosc. 2014;47:389–97.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Saxena P, Khashab MA. New NOTES clinical training and program development. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2016;26:385–400.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Eleftheriadis N, Inoue H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Maselli R, Santi G. Submucosal tunnel endoscopy: peroral endoscopic myotomy and peroral endoscopic tumor resection. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8:86–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastassios C. Manolakis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Haruhiro Inoue
    • 2
    Email author
  • Akiko Ueno
    • 2
  • Yuto Shimamura
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity Hospital of LarissaLarissaGreece
  2. 2.Digestive Diseases CenterShowa University Koto Toyosu HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations