Role of Anorectal Manometry in Clinical Practice
Physiologic assessment of the anorectum and pelvic floor by anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion testing provides important insights into the pathologic processes underlying defecatory disorders and guides treatment, specifically the use of biofeedback for the treatment of dyssynergic defecation and the identification of possible structural abnormalities of the pelvic floor. While symptoms and digital rectal examination may suggest pelvic floor dysfunction to the clinician, only pelvic floor testing provides definitive diagnoses of these often treatable abnormalities. The use of anorectal manometry in clinical practice is currently limited by substantial variation in performance of the test and interpretation of the results, but anorectal manometry with the addition of balloon expulsion test to improve specificity provides the best current modality for the diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation. With the introduction of high-resolution and three-dimensional, high-definition probes, our ability to characterize the structure and function of the anorectum has never been better, though further research is still needed to improve our ability to diagnose pelvic floor dysfunction and refer appropriate patients to treatment. In areas where the availability of anorectal manometry (ARM) is limited, a thorough digital rectal exam performed by an experienced clinician plus the balloon expulsion test alone may identify appropriate patients to refer for additional testing. This review describes the appropriate indications for and appropriate performance of anorectal manometry in clinical practice with an eye toward the diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation in patients with chronic constipation, fecal incontinence, and chronic proctalgia.
KeywordsAnorectal manometry Chronic constipation Fecal incontinence Chronic proctalgia Dyssynergic defecation Pelvic floor disorders
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Kyle Staller has served as a consultant to Allergan plc.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance••Of major importance
- 2.Chey WD, Baker J, Attari A, Ashton-Miller JA, editors. A glove-based, disposable, point-of-service device which allows physiologcial assessment of the anorectum: concordance with anorectal manometry in chronic constipation patients. Digestive Disease Week; Washington D.C; 2015.Google Scholar
- 7.•Cheeney G, Nguyen M, Valestin J, Rao SS. Topographic and manometric characterization of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(3):e147–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01857.x. A demonstration of how high-definition anorectal manomety has yielded important insights into the function of the anorectum.
- 10.Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Ringel Y, Drossman D, Whitehead WE. Randomized, controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(4):428–41. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0814-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.•Rao SS, Valestin J, Brown CK, Zimmerman B, Schulze K. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(4):890–6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.53. First study to examine the long-term effects of biofeedback for chronic constipation and correlate these with physiologic changes on anorectal manometry.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.••Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Noelting J, Harvey DM, Zinsmeister AR. Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(2):314–22 e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.049. Used high-resolution anorectal manometry to identify subtypes of dyssynergic defecation that could differentiate patients with normal and abnormal balloon expulsion times.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.A Registry of GI Motility Laboratories for Patient Evaluation. In: Society ANaM, editor. 2014.Google Scholar
- 24.•Noelting J, Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Harvey DM, Ravi K, Zinsmeister AR. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1530–6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.221. Important study establishing the normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry and demonstrated that increasing age is correlated with lower resting anal pressure.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.••Grossi U, Carrington EV, Bharucha AE, Horrocks EJ, Scott SM, Knowles CH. Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation. Gut. 2015. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308835. This study challenges long-held beliefs about the interpretation of anorectal manometry and specifically shows that only Type IV dyssynergia and the combination of high resting anal pressure and high anal pressure on evacuation can distingish constipated patients from controls.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.••Chiarioni G, Kim SM, Vantini I, Whitehead WE. Validation of the balloon evacuation test: reproducibility and agreement with findings from anorectal manometry and electromyography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(12):2049–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.03.013. Demonstrates that balloon expulsion testing correlates well with the results of anorectal manometry and electromyography as well as being reproducible over time.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.••Rao SS, Benninga MA, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, Di Lorenzo C, Whitehead WE. ANMS-ESNM position paper and consensus guidelines on biofeedback therapy for anorectal disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(5):594–609. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12520. Represents the first standards on which patients should be referred for biofeedback therapy and what should be done specifically during therapy.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Bharucha AE, Dunivan G, Goode PS, Lukacz ES, Markland AD, Matthews CA, et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):127–36. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Whitehead WE, Rao SS, Lowry A, Nagle D, Varma M, Bitar KN, et al. Treatment of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):138–46. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.303. quiz 47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Cheeney G, Remes-Troche JM, Attaluri A, Rao SS. Investigation of anal motor characteristics of the sensorimotor response (SMR) using 3-D anorectal pressure topography. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300(2):G236–40. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00348.2010.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar