Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pregnancy After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): a 2020 Update

  • Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Disease (N Scott, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a disease which affects a predominantly female and relatively young population, some of whom have not yet completed their reproductive lives. SCAD has traditionally been considered a contraindication to future pregnancy due to concerns about the risk of recurrence and the high-risk phenotype associated with pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD). This review summarizes recent advancements in the understanding of pregnancy and reproductive health after SCAD.

Recent findings

Although traditionally under-recognized and underdiagnosed, the importance of SCAD as a unique clinical entity is now recognized in a growing number of expert guidelines and consensus documents which provide advice on the management of pregnancy. Recent data, although insufficient to alter current management recommendations, offers hope that the recurrence rate in subsequent pregnancies may be lower than previously believed.

Summary

Pregnancy and reproductive health for women after SCAD is a complex area with relatively limited data to guide management decisions. At present, there is insufficient data to challenge the traditional assumption that subsequent pregnancy should be avoided. Where pregnancy is pursued, thoughtful multidisciplinary management in expert women’s heart health centres is vital. Going forward, increased experience in the management of all aspects of reproductive health in these women will hopefully provide data to allow more accurate understanding of risks and optimal management in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. •• Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, Adlam D, Arslanian-Engoren C, Economy KE, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(19):e523–e57. This article summarizes current understanding of spontaneous coronary artery dissection including pathophysiology, epidimology, associated conditions and treatment recommendations.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circ: Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(5):645–55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elkayam U, Jalnapurkar S, Barakkat MN, Khatri N, Kealey AJ, Mehra A, et al. Pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2014;129(16):1695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saw J, Ricci D, Starovoytov A, Fox R, Buller CE. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: prevalence of predisposing conditions including fibromuscular dysplasia in a tertiary center cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(1):44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Codsi E, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection associated with pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(4):426–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogowski S, Maeder MT, Weilenmann D, Haager PK, Ammann P, Rohner F, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(1):59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito H, Taylor L, Bowman M, Fry ETA, Hermiller JB, Van Tassel JW. Presentation and therapy of spontaneous coronary artery dissection and comparisons of postpartum versus nonpostpartum cases. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(11):1590–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Havakuk O, Goland S, Mehra A, Elkayam U. Pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circ: Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(3):e004941.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Gulati R, Rose CH, Best PJM. Pregnancy after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case series. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(8):598–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Tweet MS, Young KA, Rose CH, Best PJ, Gulati R, Hayes SN. Abstract 13043: pregnancy after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case series of 22 women and 31 pregnancies. Circulation. 2019;140(Suppl_1):A13043-A. This expanded case series provides the only currently available evidence on the risks of subsequent pregnancy in women with a history of SCAD.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elshatanoufy S, Kozlowski J, Dubey E, Sakr S, Gonik B. Subsequent pregnancy in a patient with spontaneous coronary artery Dissection. 2015.

  12. Elkayam U, Goland S, Pieper PG, Silverside CK. High-risk cardiac disease in pregnancy: part I. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(4):396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elkayam U, Goland S, Pieper PG, Silversides CK. High-risk cardiac disease in pregnancy: part II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(5):502–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Codsi E, Tweet MS, Rose CH, Arendt KW, Best PJ, Hayes SN. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in pregnancy: what every obstetrician should know. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):731–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Blomstrom Lundqvist C, Borghi C, Cifkova R, Ferreira R, Foidart JM, et al. ESC guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(24):3147–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Cifkova R, De Bonis M, et al. 2018 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Kardiol Pol. 2019;77(3):245–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, Alvarez AN, Mercier LA, Morton BC, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation. 2001;104(5):515–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Drenthen W, Boersma E, Balci A, Moons P, Roos-Hesselink JW, Mulder BJM, et al. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(17):2124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roos-Hesselink J, Baris L, Johnson M, De Backer J, Otto C, Marelli A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with cardiovascular disease: evolving trends over 10 years in the ESC Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(47):3848–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Naderi S. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19(9):69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Horlocker TT, Vandermeuelen E, Kopp SL, Gogarten W, Leffert LR, Benzon HT. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(3):263–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta A, Umapathi KK, Gupta M. Fetal outcomes after cardiac surgery during pregnancy: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(11 Supplement 1):2123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Datta P, Rewers-Felkins K, Kallem RR, Baker T, Hale TW. Transfer of low dose aspirin into human milk. J Hum Lact. 2017;33(2):296–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. CLASP (Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1994;343(8898):619–29.

  25. Chernoguz A, Telem DA, Chu E, Ozao-Choy J, Tammaro Y, Divino CM. Cessation of clopidogrel before major abdominal procedures. Arch Surg. 2011;146(3):334–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yarrington CD, Valente AM, Economy KE. Cardiovascular management in pregnancy. Circulation. 2015;132(14):1354–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation. 2012;126(5):579–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Curtis KMTN, Jatlaoui TC, et al. U.S. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65(No. RR-3):1–104. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malissa J. Wood MD.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

Esther Davis and Malissa Wood declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, E., Wood, M.J. Pregnancy After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): a 2020 Update. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 22, 56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-020-00858-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-020-00858-2

Keywords

Navigation