Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving Treatment Strategies for Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome

  • Valvular, Myocardial, Pericardial, and Cardiopulmonary Diseases (Patrick O’Gara and Akshay Desai, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

The treatment of acute decompensated heart failure in the presence of progressive renal dysfunction is a commonly encountered dilemma in clinical practice. Also known as cardiorenal syndrome, this complex disease state has forced researchers and clinicians to develop new treatment strategies to relieve the symptomatic congestion of heart failure while preserving renal function. Loop diuretics remain the standard of pharmacologic treatment of acute heart failure, but their effects on renal function have been called into question. The DOSE trial set out to determine optimal diuretic dosing strategies but no clear regimen was firmly established. Initial studies with vasopressin antagonists showed promise in their ability to increase urine output, provide short-term symptom relief, and correct hyponatremia while maintaining renal function. Unfortunately, the EVEREST trial did not demonstrate any benefit on long-term clinical outcomes. Adenosine antagonists also appeared to be an emerging therapeutic option, but the recently completed PROTECT trial failed to establish their role in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome. Both nesiritide and low-dose dopamine have endured years of trials with mixed results. Most recently, findings from the ASCEND-HF trial showed that nesiritide was safe with no adverse effects on renal function or mortality and was associated with a modest improvement in dyspnea. The ongoing ROSE study, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health Heart Failure Research Network, will attempt to confirm the safety and efficacy profiles of low-dose nesiritide and dopamine, as well as clarify their roles within acute heart failure management. Despite its inherent complexities, ultrafiltration has demonstrated potential benefit in several clinical outcomes compared to traditional pharmacotherapy. The results of the CARRESS-HF trial will reveal how the use of ultrafiltration specifically applies to patients with cardiorenal syndrome. The most exciting aspects about our evolving understanding of the cardiorenal system are the innovative treatments that have emerged as a result. The creation of chimeric natriuretic peptides, targeted intra-renal pharmacotherapy, the novel use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and combination treatment strategies demonstrate that despite our varied success in treating cardiorenal syndrome in the past, there are highly encouraging translational therapies rapidly developing in the pipeline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Roger VL et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:e18–e209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Forman DE et al. Incidence, predictors at admission, and impact of worsening renal function among patients hospitalized with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hillege HL et al. Renal function, neurohormonal activation, and survival in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2000;102:203–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ronco C et al. Cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1527–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schrier RW, Abraham WT. Hormones and hemodynamics in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:577–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Damman K et al. Increased central venous pressure is associated with impaired renal function and mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:582–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mullens W et al. Importance of venous congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:589–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gottlieb SS et al. BG9719 (CVT-124), an A1 adenosine receptor antagonist, protects against the decline in renal function observed with diuretic therapy. Circulation. 2002;105:1348–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogel MW, Chen HH. Novel natriuretic peptides: new compounds and new approaches. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2011;8:22–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen HH, Burnett Jr JC. The natriuretic peptides in heart failure: diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1999;111:406–16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peacock WF et al. Impact of intravenous loop diuretics on outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure: insights from the ADHERE registry. Cardiology. 2009;113:12–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullens W et al. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure in acute decompensated heart failure: a potential contributor to worsening renal function? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:300–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salvador DR, et al. Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD003178.

  14. Felker GM et al. Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:797–805.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lemmens-Gruber R, Kamyar M. Vasopressin antagonists. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:1766–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Udelson JE et al. Acute hemodynamic effects of conivaptan, a dual V(1A) and V(2) vasopressin receptor antagonist, in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2001;104:2417–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gheorghiade M et al. Effects of tolvaptan, a vasopressin antagonist, in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1963–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Konstam MA et al. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA. 2007;297:1319–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gottlieb SS. Adenosine A1 antagonists and the cardiorenal syndrome. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2008;5:105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Massie BM, et al. Rolofylline, an adenosine A1-receptor antagonist, in acute heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1419–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng JW. Nesiritide: review of clinical pharmacology and role in heart failure management. Heart Dis. 2002;4:199–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sackner-Bernstein JD, Skopicki HA, Aaronson KD. Risk of worsening renal function with nesiritide in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. Circulation. 2005;111:1487–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Witteles RM et al. Impact of nesiritide on renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and pre-existing renal dysfunction a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1835–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Riter HG et al. Nonhypotensive low-dose nesiritide has differential renal effects compared with standard-dose nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2334–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hernandez AF et al. Rationale and design of the Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure Trial (ASCEND-HF). Am Heart J. 2009;157:271–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Horowitz JD et al. Clinical Trials Update AHA Congress 2010. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2011;25:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldberg LI. Pharmacological bases for the use of dopamine and related drugs in the treatment of congestive heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989;14:S21–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedrich JO et al. Meta-analysis: low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:510–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Heart Failure Network: ROSE Trial. Available at https://www.hfnetwork.org/hf-trials/rose-trial. Accessed June 2011.

  30. Udani SM, Murray PT. The use of renal replacement therapy in acute decompensated heart failure. Semin Dial. 2009;22:173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Costanzo MR, et al. Ultrafiltration is associated with fewer rehospitalizations than continuous diuretic infusion in patients with decompensated heart failure: results from UNLOAD. J Card Fail. 2010;16:277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Heart Failure Network: CARRESS-HF Trial. Available at https://www.hfnetwork.org/hf-trials/carress-trial. Accessed June 2011.

  33. Swan SK. Diuretic strategies in patients with renal failure. Drugs. 1994;48:380–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Paterna S et al. Changes in brain natriuretic peptide levels and bioelectrical impedance measurements after treatment with high-dose furosemide and hypertonic saline solution versus high-dose furosemide alone in refractory congestive heart failure: a double blind study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1997–2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Licata G et al. Effects of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as bolus in refractory congestive heart failure: long-term effects. Am Heart J. 2003;145:459–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen HH et al. Local renal delivery of a natriuretic peptide: a renal-enhancing strategy for B-type natriuretic peptide in overt experimental heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1302–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Teirstein PS et al. Differential effects between intravenous and targeted renal delivery of fenoldopam on renal and blood pressure in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1076–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee CY, Lieu H, Burnett Jr JC. Designer natriuretic peptides. J Investig Med. 2009;57:18–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lisy O et al. Design, synthesis, and actions of a novel chimeric natriuretic peptide: CD-NP. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:60–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hunt PJ et al. Bioactivity and metabolism of C-type natriuretic peptide in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:1428–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee CY, et al. Pharmacodynamics of a novel designer natriuretic peptide, CD-NP, in a first-in-human clinical trial in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49:668–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Katz SD. Potential role of type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibition in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2003;9:9–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Supaporn T et al. Blunted cGMP response to agonists and enhanced glomerular cyclic 3′,5′-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activities in experimental congestive heart failure. Kidney Int. 1996;50:1718–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen HH et al. Maximizing the renal cyclic 3′-5′-guanosine monophosphate system with type V phosphodiesterase inhibition and exogenous natriuretic peptide: a novel strategy to improve renal function in experimental overt heart failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2742–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Krum H et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373:1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

S. Dandamudi: none; H. Chen has received research funding from Scios Inc, Niles Therapeutics, and Anexon Inc. The Mayo Clinic and Dr. Chen have patented designer chimeric natriuretic peptides and the Mayo Clinic has licensed designer natriuretic peptides to Niles Therapeutics and Anexon Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horng H. Chen MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dandamudi, S., Chen, H.H. Evolving Treatment Strategies for Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 13, 556–569 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-011-0148-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-011-0148-3

Keywords

Navigation