Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Timing of surgery in aortic stenosis

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) usually results from three distinct processes (degenerativecalcific, rheumatic, and congenital), with a final common pathway of significant aortic outflow tract obstruction. The stenotic lesion tends to progress slowly, but once symptoms develop clinical deterioration can ensue rapidly. Chest pain, dyspnea, and syncope are the most common symptoms of significant AVS. Detection of symptoms, subtle or obvious, is critical to the management of AVS because their presence portends a worse overall prognosis and is an indication for intervention. There are several special clinical scenarios that require added consideration, including individuals with concomitant coronary artery disease, the presence of a relatively small transvalvular pressure gradient in the setting of low cardiac output (so-called low-gradient AVS), and elderly with severe AVS. Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the mainstay treatment for relief of obstruction in patients with symptomatic AVS. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty is reserved for the small minority of patients who are not surgical candidates and is associated with a high restenosis rate. Percutaneous AVR is a new technology that is being tested in a few select centers on patients who are not operative candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al.: Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 29:630–634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG: Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J 1951, 41:1–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross J Jr, Braunwald E: Aortic stenosis. Circulation 1968, 38:61–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vincentelli A, Susen S, Le Tourneau T, et al.: Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:343–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman RV, Otto CM: Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation 2005, 111:3316–3326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pohle K, Maffert R, Ropers D, et al.: Progression of aortic valve calcification: association with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors. Circulation 2001, 104:1927–1932.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N, et al.: Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation 2004, 110:1291–1295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Prescott RJ, et al.: A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005, 352:2389–2397. In a prospective trial of 155 patients, intensive lipid-lowering therapy (atorvastatin 80 mg every day) did not reduce the progression of AVS (as measured by velocity across the aortic valve) or valvular calcification, but there was a trend toward decreased need for AVR.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khot UN, Novaro GM, Popovic ZB, et al.: Nitroprusside in critically ill patients with left ventricular dysfunction and aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:1756–1763.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB, et al.: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995, 26:1522–1528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW, et al.: Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994, 89:642–650.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al.: Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997, 95:2262–2270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarz F, Baumann P, Manthey J, et al.: The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation 1982, 66:1105–1110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, et al.: Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation 1997, 95:2395–2400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lange RA, Hillis LD: Dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006, 113:1718–1720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quere JP, Monin JL, Levy F, et al.: Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006, 113:1738–1744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonow RO, Carabello B, Chatterjee K, et al.: ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of patients with Valvular Heart Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:e1–e148. Accessible online at http:// www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier= 3040213. This recent update of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines presents an excellent summary of data relevant to the management of patients with AVS.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Asimakopoulos G, Edwards MB, Taylor KM: Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older: survival and cause of death based on 1100 cases: collective results from the UK Heart Valve Registry. Circulation 1997, 96:3403–3408.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Cardiology, CB #7075, 27599-7075, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    George A. Stouffer MD

Authors
  1. Siva B. Mohan MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George A. Stouffer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohan, S.B., Stouffer, G.A. Timing of surgery in aortic stenosis. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 8, 421–427 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-006-0029-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-006-0029-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation