Skip to main content
Log in

Electronic and telemedicine techniques to manage heart failure

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Electronic monitoring and telemedicine techniques are effective tools to manage patients with moderate and high risk heart failure as part of a multidisciplinary disease management system. They have been shown to reduce hospitalization and emergency room visits, improve quality of life, and possibly impact mortality. In addition, several have been shown to be cost-effective. They encourage patient education and self-management and facilitate guideline-mandated care. These technologies can improve efficiency by allowing a single clinician to closely manage many patients in a high-quality manner. Simultaneously, these systems can burden the existing health care system by adding large volumes of new data that need to be reviewed and acted upon. Payers must develop realistic reimbursement schemes to offset the costs of supervising these systems. Newer devices that collect many physiologic variables, including some that invasively record ambulatory hemodynamics, add significant complexity, but it is unclear whether this additional data will improve management and outcomes to justify the incremental risks and costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. American Heart Association: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2005 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al.: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2001, 104:2996–3007.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benatar D, Bondmass M, Ghitelman J, Avitall B: Outcomes of chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:347–352. Compared home care nursing versus nurse telemanagement using noninvasive physiologic monitors that demonstrated that the telemedicine patients had fewer admissions with decreased health care costs. Suggests a “value added” to the telemedicine intervention compared with traditional home care.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mueller TM, Vuckovic KM, Knox DA, Williams RE: Telemanagement of heart failure: a diuretic treatment algorithm for advanced practice nurses. Heart Lung 2002, 31:340–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Field MJ, Grigsby J: Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring. JAMA 2002, 288:423–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moyer-Knox D, Mueller TM, Vuckovic K, et al.: Remote titration of carvedilol for heart failure patients by advanced practice nurses. J Card Fail 2004, 10:219–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Riegel B, Carlson B, Glaser D, Hoagland P: Which patients with heart failure respond best to multidisciplinary disease management? J Card Fail 2000, 6:290–299. Evaluated subgroups of patients with heart failure and deterined that those with moderate heart failure received the most benefit from disease management interventions.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg LR, Piette JD, Walsh MN, et al.: Randomized trial of a daily electronic home monitoring system in patients with advanced heart failure: the Weight Monitoring in Heart Failure (WHARF) trial. Am Heart J 2003, 146:705–712. A large, multicentered, randomized clinical trial assessing the use of an electronic scale system versus usual care that demonstrated an improved survival for those receiving the intervention.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rich MW: Heart failure disease management programs: efficacy and limitations. Am J Med 2001, 110:410–412. An editorial that discusses many of the issues that limit the implementation of disease management and explains the need for additional studies to define the role of these programs.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider NM: Managing congestive heart failure using home telehealth. Home Healthcare Nurse 2004, 22:719–722.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duffy JR, Hoskins LM, Chen MC: Nonpharmacological strategies for improving heart failure outcomes in the community: a systematic review. J Nurs Care Qual 2004, 19:349–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Riegel B, Carlson B, Kopp Z, et al.: Effect of a standardized nurse case-management telephone intervention on resource use in patients with chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2002, 162:705–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Canesin MF, Giorgi D, Oliveira MT, et al.: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring of patients with heart failure. A new prognosis marker. Arg Bras Cardiol 2002, 78:83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Artinian NT, Harden JK, Kronenberg MW, et al.: Pilot study of a Web-based compliance monitoring device for patients with congestive heart failure. Heart Lung 2003, 32:226–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jerant AF, Azari R, Martinez C, Nesbitt TS: A randomized trial of telenursing to reduce hospitalization for heart failure: patient-centered outcomes and nursing indicators. Home Health Care Sew Q 2003, 22:1–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cordisco ME, Benjaminovitz A, Hammond K, Mancini D: Use of telemonitoring to decrease the rate of hospitalization in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1999, 84:860–862.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth A, Kajiloti I, Elkayam I, et al.: Telecardiology for patients with chronic heart failure: the ‘SHL’ experience in Israel. Int J Cardiol 2004, 97:49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kjellstrom B, Linde C, Bennett T, et al.: Six years follow-up of an implanted SvO(2) sensor in the right ventricle. Eur J Heart Fail 2004, 6:627–634.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohlsson A, Steinhaus D, Kjellstrom B, et al.: Central hemodynamic responses during serial exercise tests in heart failure patients using implantable hemodynamic monitors. Eur J Heart Fail 2003, 5:253–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Adamson PB, Magalski A, Braunschweig F, et al.: Ongoing right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure: clinical value of measurements derived from an implantable monitoring system. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:565–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Magalski A, Adamson P, Gadler F, et al.: L Continuous ambulatory right heart pressure measurements with an implantable hemodynamic monitor: a multicenter, 12-month follow-up study of patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 2002, 8:63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohlsson A, Kubo SH, Steinhaus D, et al.: Continuous ambulatory monitoring of absolute right ventricular pressure and mixed venous oxygen saturation in patients with heart failure using an implantable haemodynamic monitor: results of a 1 year multicentre feasibility study. Eur Heart J 2001, 22:942–954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldberg, L.R. Electronic and telemedicine techniques to manage heart failure. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 7, 333–338 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-005-0044-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-005-0044-9

Keywords

Navigation