Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Opinion Statement

  • Syndrome X, defined as typical angina with positive exercise test results and normal coronary angiographic findings, represents a multifactorial pathophysiologic state that may range from abnormalities in pain perception to abnormalities in endothelial- and nonendothelial-dependent coronary flow reserve associated with myocardial ischemia. Treatment begins with accurate diagnosis by means of a comprehensive coronary vascular reactivity evaluation. This may lay the groundwork for appropriate treatment.

  • The management of patients with syndrome X is challenging, and it may be necessary to attempt various medications depending on the patient’s response. We feel that the first step in the treatment is accurate diagnosis. This is done by performing a functional angiogram (assessment of endothelial-dependent and endothelialindependent coronary flow reserve). In those without evidence of coronary flow reserve abnormalities, reassurance might be curative; however, in those who continue to have symptoms, a trial of imipramine therapy at a dose of 50 mg/d may be attempted, provided other organic disorders (in particular gastrointestinal disorders) are excluded.

  • Those who demonstrate evidence of abnormal coronary vascular reactivity are approached as outlined in Figure 1. Patients are advised to avoid medications that may cause coronary “spasm.” We routinely refer our patients to the cardiovascular health clinic for risk factor management and an exercise program.

  • Our first choice of medications usually consists of slow-release calcium channel blockers. We tend to start with a once-a-day regimen, and based on the response, we occasionally change the regimen to twice a day. If the functional angiogram reveals concomitant epicardial disease, then nitrates are added to the medical regimen. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are part of the treatment if the patient has hypertension or diabetes or if calcium channel blocker therapy fails. L-Arginine at an initial dosage of 1 g three times daily is added and may be increased to 3 g three times daily if no contraindications are present. Because there are no data regarding the effect of L-arginine, which may affect insulin secretion, in patients with diabetes, we use caution in this patient population [1]. There is no “gold standard” therapy for syndrome X, so each patient may respond differently to the initial medical therapy. Thus, we follow these patients closely to monitor their response to treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Schmidt HHHW, Warner TD, Ishii K, et al.: Insulin secretion from pancreatic B cells caused by L-argininederived nitric oxide. Science 1992, 255:721–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cannon RO III, Camici PG, Epstein SE: Pathophysiologic dilemma of syndrome X. Circulation 1992, 85:883–892. This article provides an excellent review of the pathogenesis of syndrome X.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasdai D, Holmes DR Jr, Higano ST, et al.: The prevalence of coronary blood flow reserve abnormalities among patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and chest pain. Mayo Clin Proc 1998, 73:1133–1141. This article describes the prevalence of coronary flow reserve abnormalities in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiographic findings who underwent vascular reactivity evaluation at our institution.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cannon RO III: How to manage chest pain in patients with normal coronary angiograms. Cardiologia 1997, 42:21–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasdai D, Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR Jr, et al.: Coronary endothelial dysfunction in humans is associated with myocardial perfusion defects. Circulation 1997, 96:3390–3395.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeiher AM, Krause T, Schachinger V, et al.: Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of coronary resistance vessels is associated with exercise-induced ischemia. Circulation 1995, 91:2345–2352. This article was one of the first to describe an association between exercise-induced ischemia and endothelial dysfunction.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cianflone D, Lanza GA, Maseri A: Microvascular angina in patients with normal coronary arteries and with other ischaemic syndromes. Eur Heart J 1995, 16(suppl I):96–103. This article provides an excellent overall review of the disease.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galassi AR, Crea F, Araujo LI, et al.: Comparison of regional myocardial blood flow in syndrome X and one vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1993, 72:134–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lanza GA, Manzoli A, Bia E, et al.: Acute effects of nitrates in exercise testing in patients with syndrome X: clinical and pathophysiologic implications. Circulation 1994, 90:2695–2700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burgiardini R, Borghi A, Pozzati A, et al.: The paradox of nitrates in patients with angina pectoris and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1993, 72:343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fragasso G, Chierchia SL, Pizzetti G, et al.: Impaired left ventricular filling dynamics in patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries: effect of beta adrenergic blockade. Heart 1997, 77:32–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burgiardini R, Borghi A, Biaggetti L, Puddu P: Comparison of verapamil versus propranolol therapy in syndrome X. Am J Cardiol 1989, 63:286–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borghi A, Sassone B, Trevisani M, et al.: Long-term efficacy of beta-blockers in syndrome X [abstract]. Circulation 1991, 84:II732.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romeo F, Gaspardone A, Ciavollela M, Gioffre P: Verapamil versus acebutolol for syndrome X. Am J Cardiol 1988, 62:312–313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cannon RO III, Watson RM, Rosing DR, Epstein SE: Efficacy of calcium channel blocker therapy for angina pectoris from small-vessel coronary artery disease and abnormal vasodilator reserve. Am J Cardiol 1985, 56:242–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Montorsi P, Cozzi S, Loaldi A, et al.: Acute coronary vasomotor effects of nifedipine and therapeutic correlates in syndrome X. Am J Cardiol 1990, 66:302–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaski JC, Rosano G, Gavrielides S, Chen L: Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on exercise-induced angina and ST segment depression in patients with microvascular angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994, 23:652–657.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nalbantgil I, Onder R, Altintig A, et al.: Therapeutic benefits of cilazapril in patients with syndrome X. Cardiology 1998, 89:130–133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Egashira K, Hirooka Y, Kuga T, et al.: Homocysteine, vitamins, and cardiovascular disease.. Circulation 1998, 98:196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lerman A, Burnett JC, Higano ST, et al.: Long-term L-arginine supplementation improves small-vessel coronary endothelial function in humans. Circulation 1998, 97:2123–2128. This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of oral L-arginine reports clinical improvement in symptoms in patients with microvascular angina in association with improvement in endothelial function.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Emdin M, Picano E, Lattanzi F, L’Abbate A: Improved exercise capacity with acute aminophylline administration in patients with syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989, 14:1450–1453. A double-blind randomized study evaluating the role of aminophylline in syndrome X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Elliot P, Krzyzowska-Dickinson K, Calvino R, et al.: Effect of oral aminophylline in patients with angina and normal coronary arteriograms (cardiac syndrome X). Heart 1997, 77:523–526.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cannon RO, Quyyumi AA, Mincemoyer R, et al.: Imipramine in patients with chest pain despite normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med 1994, 330:1411–1417. A randomized study describing the role of imipramine in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiographic findings.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrison DG, Bates JN: The nitrovasodilators. New ideas about old drugs. Circulation 1993, 87:1461–1467. This article provides an excellent review of nitrates and their mechanism of action.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mancini GBJ, Henry GC, Macaya C, et al.: Angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibition with quinapril improves endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease: the TREND study (Trial on Reversing Endothelial Dysfunction). Circulation 1996, 94:258–265. A randomized study demonstrating the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in improving endothelial function.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooke JP: Nutriceuticals for cardiovascular health. Am J Cardiol 1998, 82(10A):43S-45S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Treasure CB, Klein JL, Weintraub WS, et al.: Beneficial effects of cholesterol-lowering therapy on the coronary endothelium in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1995, 332:481–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Huggins GS, Pasternak RC, Alpert NM, et al.: Effects of short-term coronary vasodilator function and myocardial perfusion in regions having substantial impairment of baseline dilator reserve. Circulation 1998, 98:1291–1296.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vogel RA, Corretti MC, Gellman J: Cholesterol, cholesterol lowering and endothelial function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1998, 41:117–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gerhard M, Walsh BW, Tawakol A, et al.: Estradiol therapy combined with progesterone and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Circulation 1998, 98:1158–1163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Collins P, Rosano GMC, Sarrell PM: 17-Estradiol attenuates acetylcholine-induced coronary arterial constriction in women but not men with coronary heart disease. Circulation 1995, 92:24–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, et al.: Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent flow mediated vasodilation in post-menopausal women. Ann Intern Med 1994, 121:936–941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosano GM, Peters NS, Lefroy D, et al.: 17-β-Estradiol therapy lessens angina in postmenopausal women with syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996, 28(6):1500–1505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sanderson JE, Woo KS, Chung HK, et al.: The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on coronary and systemic haemodynamics in syndrome X. Coron Artery Dis 1996, 7(7):547–552. A study evaluating the role and effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with syndrome X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bagger JP, Jensen BS, Johannsen G: Long-term outcome of spinal cord electrical stimulation in patients with refractory chest pain. Clin Cardiol 1998, 21(4):286–288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sanderson JE, Ibrahim B, Waterhouse D, Palmer RB: Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina—long-term clinical outcome and safety. Eur Heart J 1994, 15(6):810–814.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Anderson C, Hole P, Oxhoj H: Spinal cord stimulation as a pain treatment for angina pectoris. Pain Clin 1995, 4:333–339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suwaidi, J.A., Lerman, A. Syndrome X. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 2, 73–82 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-000-0030-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-000-0030-1

Keywords

Navigation