Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a Physician-Led Model for Research Mentorship in Academic Urology

  • EDUCATION (G BADALATO AND E MARGOLIN, SECTION EDITORS)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Quality mentorship is difficult to attain amidst the conflicting demands of academic medicine. In this review, we sought to characterize mentor–mentee relationships and discuss their optimization towards productivity in the research team setting.

Recent Findings

A high-value mentor, defined by exceptional commitment to both research productivity and mentoring, naturally attracts prospective mentees, who can demonstrate their interest by shadowing and completing delegated tasks. Once fully initiated, the mentee establishes expectations with the mentor, identifies their roles within the research team, and, over time, takes ownership of the mentor–mentee relationship and collaborates with near-peers.

Summary

Mentorship is a dynamic, reciprocal relationship that enhances career development of both participants. In the research team setting, episodic virtual research meetings and prudent delegation orient the entire team, while the mentor-mentee relationship is upheld by embracing a culture of responsiveness, feedback, and collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1103–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramanan RA, Taylor WC, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Mentoring matters. Mentoring and career preparation in internal medicine residency training. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):340–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00346.x.

  3. Choi AMK, Moon JE, Steinecke A, Prescott JE. Developing a culture of mentorship to strengthen academic medical centers. Acad Med. 2019;94(5):630–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aylor M, Cruz M, Narayan A, et al. Optimizing your mentoring relationship: a toolkit for mentors and mentees. MedEdPORTAL. 2016;12:10459. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10459.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaps L, Stine JG, Mellinger J, Vilarinho S. Great expectations: principal investigator and trainee perspectives on hiring, supervision, and mentoring. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2(9):999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Russel SM, Geraghty JR, Renaldy H, Thompson TM, Hirshfield LE. Training for professional uncertainty: socialization of medical students through the residency application process. Acad Med. 2021;96(11S):S144–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kashiwagi DT, Varkey P, Cook DA. Mentoring programs for physicians in academic medicine: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(7):1029–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294f368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Healy CC, Welchert AJ. Mentoring relations: a definition to advance research and practice. Educ Res. 1990;19(9):17–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019009017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thakur A, Fedorka P, Ko C, Buchmiller-Crair TL, Atkinson JB, Fonkalsrud EW. Impact of mentor guidance in surgical career selection. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(12):1802–4. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.28842.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reynolds HY. In choosing a research health career, mentoring is essential. Lung. 2008;186(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-007-9050-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Passi V, Johnson S, Peile E, Wright S, Hafferty F, Johnson N. Doctor role modelling in medical education: BEME Guide No. 27. Med Teach. 2013;35(9):e1422–1436. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.806982.

  12. Geraci SA, Thigpen SC. A review of mentoring in academic medicine. Am J Med Sci. 2017;353(2):151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2016.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. • Nassour I, Balentine C, Boland GM, Chu D, Habermann E, Holscher C, Idrees K, In H, Kimbrough MK, Mitchem J, Warner SG, Karakousis G. Committee on Academic Advancement of the Association for Academic Surgery. Successful mentor-mentee relationship J Surg Res. 2020;247:332–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.066. Letter from the Association for Academic Surgery summarizing elements of both the successful mentor and the successful mentee in a concise bullet point format.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fulton J. Mentorship: excellence in the mundane. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants. 2013;7(3):142–5. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjha.2013.7.3.142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kilgallon K, Thompson J, eds. Mentoring in Nursing and Healthcare: A Practical Approach. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.

  16. Morrison M, Merlo K, Woessner Z. How to boost the impact of scientific conferences. Cell. 2020;182(5):1067–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Landry A, Lewiss RE. Is good mentorship found on Twitter? We think so. Eur J Emerg Med. 2021;28(1):9–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leary JC, Schainker EG, Leyenaar JK. The unwritten rules of mentorship: facilitators of and barriers to effective mentorship in pediatric hospital medicine. Hosp Pediatr. 2016;6(4):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2015-0108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonçalves M de CN, Bellodi PL. Mentors also need support: a study on their difficulties and resources in medical schools. Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(4):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802012000400009.

  20. •• Highet A, Kendrick DE, Bandeh-Ahmadi H, et al. Pragmatic mentoring strategies for the busy surgeon scientist. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(3):695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.01.003. Semi-structured interviews reveal that recipients of an institution-wide mentorship award establish new mentor-mentee partnerships intentionally, followed by discussion of goals/expectations and involvement of the mentee within the broader research team.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kram KE. Phases of the mentor relationship. Acad Manag J. 1983;26(4):608–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/255910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nassar AK, Waheed A, Tuma F. Academic clinicians’ workload challenges and burnout analysis. Cureus. 2019;11(11):e6108. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6108.

  23. Zerzan JT, Hess R, Schur E, Phillips RS, Rigotti N. Making the most of mentors: a guide for mentees. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):140–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181906e8f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aagaard EM, Hauer KE. A cross-sectional descriptive study of mentoring relationships formed by medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(4):298–302. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20334.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin S, Nguyen C, Walters E, Gordon P. Residents’ perspectives on careers in academic medicine: obstacles and opportunities. Fam Med. 2018;50(3):204–11. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2018.306625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rose GL, Rukstalis MR, Schuckit MA. Informal mentoring between faculty and medical students. Acad Med. 2005;80(4):344–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200504000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Detsky AS, Baerlocher MO. Academic mentoring–how to give it and how to get it. JAMA. 2007;297(19):2134–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.19.2134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pololi L, Knight S. Mentoring faculty in academic medicine. A new paradigm? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(9):866–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.05007.x.

  29. Drucker PF. Managing oneself. Harv Bus Rev. 1999;77(2):64–74, 185.

  30. Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78(3):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200303000-00020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shollen SL, Bland CJ, Center BA, Finstad DA, Taylor AL. Relating mentor type and mentoring behaviors to academic medicine faculty satisfaction and productivity at one medical school. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1267–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Linney BJ. The art of delegation. Physician Exec. 1998;24(1):58–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chin MH, Covinsky KE, McDermott MM, Thomas EJ. Building a research career in general internal medicine: a perspective from young investigators. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(2):117–22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00028.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramanan RA, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Silen W, Reede JY. Mentoring in medicine: keys to satisfaction. Am J Med. 2002;112(4):336–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01032-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sarkany D, Deitte L. Providing feedback: practical skills and strategies. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(6):740–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jug R, Jiang XS, Bean SM. Giving and receiving effective feedback: a review article and how-to guide. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(2):244–50. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. French JC, Colbert CY, Pien LC, Dannefer EF, Taylor CA. Targeted feedback in the milestones era: utilization of the ask-tell-ask feedback model to promote reflection and self-assessment. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):e274-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cho CS, Ramanan RA, Feldman MD. Defining the ideal qualities of mentorship: a qualitative analysis of the characteristics of outstanding mentors. Am J Med. 2011;124(5):453–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ameredes BT, Hellmich MR, Cestone CM, et al. The Multidisciplinary Translational Team (MTT) model for training and development of translational research investigators. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8(5):533–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, Durning S. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):583–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Seritan AL, Bhangoo R, Garma S, Dubé J, Park JH, Hales R. Society for women in academic psychiatry: a peer mentoring approach. Acad Psychiatry. 2007;31(5):363–6. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.31.5.363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. • Baker EL, Hengelbrok H, Murphy SA, Gilkey R. Building a coaching culture-the roles of coaches, mentors, and sponsors. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(3):325–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001368. Column delineating the roles of coach, mentor, and sponsor for those in leadership positions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hengelbrok H, Baker EL. Connecting with coaches, mentors, and sponsors: advice for the emerging leader. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(4):421–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. • Sarabipour S, Hainer SJ, Furlong E, et al. Writing an effective and supportive recommendation letter. FEBS J. 2022;289(2):298–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15757. Guidelines on how to write a strong letter of recommendation letter, including a flowchart and key do’s and don’ts.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Movassaghi M, Gillespie A, Deibert CM, et al. The impact of visiting rotations on the urology residency match: insights and perspectives from the 2021–2022 applicants. Urology. Published online September 16, 2022:S0090–4295(22)00799–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.040.

  46. Liu HY, Beresin EV, Chisolm MS. Social media skills for professional development in psychiatry and medicine. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2019;42(3):483–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2019.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Becerra LA, Sellers TP, Contreras BP. Maximizing the conference experience: tips to effectively navigate academic conferences early in professional careers. Behav Anal Pract. 2020;13(2):479–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00406-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjith Ramasamy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animals Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Education

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivero, MJ., Rahman, F., Campbell, K. et al. Developing a Physician-Led Model for Research Mentorship in Academic Urology. Curr Urol Rep 24, 205–212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01148-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01148-7

Keywords

Navigation