Skip to main content
Log in

Penile Implant Instrument Innovations

  • MEN'S HEALTH (R CARRION, SECTION EDITOR)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Numerous innovations have been made since the first inflatable penile prosthesis was introduced in 1973—not just of the implant apparatus itself, but crucially also in the surgical instruments used for prosthetic surgery. Starting with Dr. Furlow’s revolutionary inserter tool, advancements were quickly made in dilators, retractors, and cavernotomes.

Recent Findings

More recent innovations have been made in inserter tools, forceps, needle holders, clamps, and disposable instruments. Leading companies Boston Scientific and Coloplast have contributed significantly to the evolution of IPP surgical placement, and companies such as Uramix and Rigicon are developing a wide array of new specialized tools.

Summary

We aim to summarize the instruments needed for IPP placement, with a focus on describing the variety of instrument innovations since Dr. Brantley Scott designed and placed the first IPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Goodwin WE, Scott WW. Phalloplasty. J Urol. 1952;68(6):903–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)68301-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beheri GE. Surgical treatment of impotence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;38(2):92–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196608000-00002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis. New implant for management of impotence. Urology. 1975;5(4):479–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(75)90071-0.

  4. Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis Urology. 1973;2(1):80–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Furlow WL. Inflatable penile prosthesis: Mayo Clinic experience with 175 patients. Urology. 1979;13(2):166–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(79)90289-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mobley DF. Early history of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a view from someone who was there. Asian J Androl. 2015 Mar-Apr;17(2):225–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.140962 (PMID: 25432494; PMCID: PMC4650450).

  7. Smith AD, Lange PH, Fraley EE. A comparison of the Small-Carrion and Scott-Bradley penile prostheses. J Urol. 1979;121(5):609–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56901-3 (PMID: 439256).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks MB. Penile prosthesis: a new device for corpus cavernosal dilation. Urology. 1989;34(4):225–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(89)90379-8 (PMID: 2800089).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and “no touch” surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79(6):1310–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.076.

  10. Dhabuwala C, Sheth S, Zamzow B. Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparison with Inhibizone-impregnated AMS penile implants. J Sex Med. 2011;8(1):315–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02068.x.

  11. Wilson SK. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prosthesis into scarred corporeal bodies. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15(Suppl 5):S125–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Szabo D, Jenkins LC. Preparation and operative setup of penile prosthesis surgery. J Vis Surg. 2020;6:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morey forceps and Olsen-Hegar needle holder. Uramix. https://uramix.com/morey-forceps-olsen-hegar/. Published 22 Apr 2022. Accessed 8 Sep 2022.

  14. • The Mooreville dilator - single-bladed cavernotome. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 9 Sep 2021. Accessed 8 Aug 2022. One of the more novel innovations in prosthetic instrumentation, employing a new design instead of improving upon existing ones.

  15. Mooreville M, Adrian S, Delk JR 2nd, Wilson SK. Implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis in patients with severe corporeal fibrosis: introduction of a new penile cavernotome. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2054–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68099-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. The Mooreville II - Double bladed advanced cavernotome. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 28 Sep 2021. Accessed 8 Aug 2022.

  17. Garber BB, Lim C. Inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in men with severe intracorporal fibrosis. Curr Urol. 2017;10(2):92–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The Mooreville CavernoCorer. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 21 Jun 2022. Accessed 8 Aug 2022.

  19. Capoccia EM, Phelps JN, Levine LA. Modified inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir placement into space of Retzius: comparing outcomes in men with or without prior pelvic surgery. J Sex Med. 2017;14(7):968–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perito P, Wilson S. The history of nontraditional or ectopic placement of reservoirs in prosthetic urology. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(2):190–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson S. Ectopic reservoir placement VJPU. 2014;1:040.

    Google Scholar 

  22. New ectopic Wilson reservoir clamp. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 8 Sep 2021. Accessed 8 Aug 2022.

  23. • Yafi FA, Furr J, El-Khatib FM, van Renterghem K, Venturino L, Andrianne R, Osmonov D, Ralph D, Otero JR, Sempels M, Hatzichristodoulou G, Lentz A, Wilson SK. Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(3):291–295. (Epub 2020 March 18). Due to the morbidity of prosthetic infections, research into potential causes and solutions continues to be a high priority in Sexual Medicine.

  24. Mooreville needle introducer. Uramix. https://uramix.com/mooreville-needle-introducer/. Published 13 May 2022. Accessed 10 Sep 2022.

  25. Gross MS. Comment on Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(3):382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0281-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. • Karaman MI, Koca O. A novel corporal dilation tool in penile implant surgery. North ClinIstanb. 2022;9(2):197–198. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2022.68889 (PMID: 35582507; PMCID: PMC9039639). One of the more common instrument innovations currently in prosthetic urology is the advent of single-use and more readily cleaned instruments, due to efforts to continually decrease infection rates.

  27. Brooks. Coloplast. https://www.coloplast.us/brooks-en-us.aspx#section=product-description_3. Accessed 8 Sep 2022.

  28. RossellóBarbará M, Carrión H. Cavernotomo [Cavernotomy]. Arch Esp Urol. 1991;44(2):185–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):1880–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02281.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boston scientific AMS. AMS disposable dilators. AMS Disposable Dilators. https://www.amsmenshealth.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/uro-wh/general/ams/Resources/AMSUS_ED-00955-Disposable_Dilators_Spec_Sheet-3.14.14.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed 11 Sep 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dana Weiss for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Nelwan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Rafael E. Carrion, MD, is consultant for Coloplast, Boston Scientific, Rigicon, and Endo Pharmaceuticals. Justin Parker, MD, is a consultant for Coloplast. Other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

The article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Men's Health

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quesada-Olarte, J., Nelwan, D., Donato, U. et al. Penile Implant Instrument Innovations. Curr Urol Rep 24, 59–67 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01136-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01136-3

Keywords

Navigation