Abstract
Purpose of Review
Numerous innovations have been made since the first inflatable penile prosthesis was introduced in 1973—not just of the implant apparatus itself, but crucially also in the surgical instruments used for prosthetic surgery. Starting with Dr. Furlow’s revolutionary inserter tool, advancements were quickly made in dilators, retractors, and cavernotomes.
Recent Findings
More recent innovations have been made in inserter tools, forceps, needle holders, clamps, and disposable instruments. Leading companies Boston Scientific and Coloplast have contributed significantly to the evolution of IPP surgical placement, and companies such as Uramix and Rigicon are developing a wide array of new specialized tools.
Summary
We aim to summarize the instruments needed for IPP placement, with a focus on describing the variety of instrument innovations since Dr. Brantley Scott designed and placed the first IPP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Goodwin WE, Scott WW. Phalloplasty. J Urol. 1952;68(6):903–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)68301-0.
Beheri GE. Surgical treatment of impotence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;38(2):92–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196608000-00002.
Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis. New implant for management of impotence. Urology. 1975;5(4):479–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(75)90071-0.
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis Urology. 1973;2(1):80–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0.
Furlow WL. Inflatable penile prosthesis: Mayo Clinic experience with 175 patients. Urology. 1979;13(2):166–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(79)90289-9.
Mobley DF. Early history of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a view from someone who was there. Asian J Androl. 2015 Mar-Apr;17(2):225–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.140962 (PMID: 25432494; PMCID: PMC4650450).
Smith AD, Lange PH, Fraley EE. A comparison of the Small-Carrion and Scott-Bradley penile prostheses. J Urol. 1979;121(5):609–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56901-3 (PMID: 439256).
Brooks MB. Penile prosthesis: a new device for corpus cavernosal dilation. Urology. 1989;34(4):225–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(89)90379-8 (PMID: 2800089).
Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and “no touch” surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79(6):1310–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.076.
Dhabuwala C, Sheth S, Zamzow B. Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparison with Inhibizone-impregnated AMS penile implants. J Sex Med. 2011;8(1):315–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02068.x.
Wilson SK. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prosthesis into scarred corporeal bodies. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15(Suppl 5):S125–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901086.
Szabo D, Jenkins LC. Preparation and operative setup of penile prosthesis surgery. J Vis Surg. 2020;6:5.
Morey forceps and Olsen-Hegar needle holder. Uramix. https://uramix.com/morey-forceps-olsen-hegar/. Published 22 Apr 2022. Accessed 8 Sep 2022.
• The Mooreville dilator - single-bladed cavernotome. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 9 Sep 2021. Accessed 8 Aug 2022. One of the more novel innovations in prosthetic instrumentation, employing a new design instead of improving upon existing ones.
Mooreville M, Adrian S, Delk JR 2nd, Wilson SK. Implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis in patients with severe corporeal fibrosis: introduction of a new penile cavernotome. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2054–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68099-8.
The Mooreville II - Double bladed advanced cavernotome. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 28 Sep 2021. Accessed 8 Aug 2022.
Garber BB, Lim C. Inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in men with severe intracorporal fibrosis. Curr Urol. 2017;10(2):92–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447158.
The Mooreville CavernoCorer. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 21 Jun 2022. Accessed 8 Aug 2022.
Capoccia EM, Phelps JN, Levine LA. Modified inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir placement into space of Retzius: comparing outcomes in men with or without prior pelvic surgery. J Sex Med. 2017;14(7):968–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.002.
Perito P, Wilson S. The history of nontraditional or ectopic placement of reservoirs in prosthetic urology. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(2):190–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.10.008.
Wilson S. Ectopic reservoir placement VJPU. 2014;1:040.
New ectopic Wilson reservoir clamp. Uramix. https://uramix.com/the-mooreville-dilator/. Published 8 Sep 2021. Accessed 8 Aug 2022.
• Yafi FA, Furr J, El-Khatib FM, van Renterghem K, Venturino L, Andrianne R, Osmonov D, Ralph D, Otero JR, Sempels M, Hatzichristodoulou G, Lentz A, Wilson SK. Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(3):291–295. (Epub 2020 March 18). Due to the morbidity of prosthetic infections, research into potential causes and solutions continues to be a high priority in Sexual Medicine.
Mooreville needle introducer. Uramix. https://uramix.com/mooreville-needle-introducer/. Published 13 May 2022. Accessed 10 Sep 2022.
Gross MS. Comment on Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(3):382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0281-1.
• Karaman MI, Koca O. A novel corporal dilation tool in penile implant surgery. North ClinIstanb. 2022;9(2):197–198. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2022.68889 (PMID: 35582507; PMCID: PMC9039639). One of the more common instrument innovations currently in prosthetic urology is the advent of single-use and more readily cleaned instruments, due to efforts to continually decrease infection rates.
Brooks. Coloplast. https://www.coloplast.us/brooks-en-us.aspx#section=product-description_3. Accessed 8 Sep 2022.
RossellóBarbará M, Carrión H. Cavernotomo [Cavernotomy]. Arch Esp Urol. 1991;44(2):185–6.
Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):1880–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02281.x.
Boston scientific AMS. AMS disposable dilators. AMS Disposable Dilators. https://www.amsmenshealth.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/uro-wh/general/ams/Resources/AMSUS_ED-00955-Disposable_Dilators_Spec_Sheet-3.14.14.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed 11 Sep 2022.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Dana Weiss for reviewing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Rafael E. Carrion, MD, is consultant for Coloplast, Boston Scientific, Rigicon, and Endo Pharmaceuticals. Justin Parker, MD, is a consultant for Coloplast. Other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
The article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Men's Health
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Quesada-Olarte, J., Nelwan, D., Donato, U. et al. Penile Implant Instrument Innovations. Curr Urol Rep 24, 59–67 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01136-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01136-3