Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Review on Penile Doppler and Ultrasonography for Erectile Dysfunction

Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Herein, we seek to review the clinical applications of penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (PDDU) in sexual medicine practices and discuss the indications, protocols, advantages, and limitations of this diagnostic modality. Other more outdated diagnostic tests, such as cavernosometry, are briefly discussed to provide the reader a background of understanding on the evolution of diagnostic testing within the realm of sexual medicine.

Recent Findings

PDDU has become a key diagnostic tool in the clinical evaluation of both erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie’s disease (PD). With the assistance of intracavernosal injections such as alprostadil, clinicians can utilize ultrasound technology to produce a detailed description of the hemodynamics of the patient’s erection cycle. This information plays a pivotal role in establishing an accurate diagnosis and creating a sensible management plan for the patient.

Summary

This review aims to provide a better understanding regarding the technique and interpretation of PDDU as it pertains to male sexual function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •   Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Impotence. NIH Consens Statement. 1992;10(4):1–33.

  2. Kessler A, Sollie S, Challacombe B, Briggs K, Van Hemelrijck M. The global prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a review. BJU Int. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma M, Yu B, Qin F, Yuan J. Current approaches to the diagnosis of vascular erectile dysfunction. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(2):709–21. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. • Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200(3):633–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004. The current AUA guidelines, serving to assist clinical decisions and patient care, is a comprehensive standard all clinicians within the sexual health industry should be familiar with.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49(6):822–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology. 1999;54(2):346–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00099-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(6):319–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mulhall JP, Goldstein I, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Hvidsten K. Validation of the erection hardness score. J Sex Med. 2007;4(6):1626–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00600.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen RC, Catania J, Pollack L, Althof S, O’Leary M, Seftel AD. Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ): scale development and psychometric validation. Urology. 2004;64(4):777–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alwaal A, Awad M, Boggs N, Kuzbel J, Snoad B. Sexual health inventory for men questionnaire as a screening method for erectile dysfunction in a general urology clinic. Sex Med. 2020;8(4):660–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen HR, Tian RH, Li P, Chen HX, Xia SJ, Li Z. Estradiol is an independent risk factor for organic erectile dysfunction in eugonadal young men. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(6):636–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_135_19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shvartzman P. The role of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring in the evaluation of impotence. J Fam Pract. 1994;39(3):279–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiggins A, Farrell MR, Tsambarlis P, Levine LA. The penile sensitivity ratio: a novel application of biothesiometry to assess changes in penile sensitivity. J Sex Med. 2019;16(3):447–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spiliopoulos S, Shaida N, Katsanos K, Krokidis M. The role of interventional radiology in the diagnosis and management of male impotence. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(5):1204–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0520-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kromann-Andersen B, Nielsen KK, Nordling J. Cavernosometry: methodology and reproducibility with and without pharmacological agents in the evaluation of venous impotence. Br J Urol. 1991;67(5):517–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15198.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung DC, Park SY, Lee JY. Penile Doppler ultrasonography revisited. Ultrasonography. 2018;37(1):16–24. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.17022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. du Moon G. Evolution of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. World J Mens Health. 2015;33(3):123–4. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.3.123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang N, Wu C, Zhou X, Zhai G, Wu J. Cavernous nerve injury resulted erectile dysfunction and regeneration. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:5353785. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5353785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen ST, Lund M, Ostergaard LD, Lund L. Role of regenerative therapies on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(4):488–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00406-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Perry WRG, Abd El Aziz MA, Duchalais E, Grass F, Behm KT, Mathis KL, et al. Sexual dysfunction following surgery for rectal cancer: a single-institution experience. Updates Surg. 2021;73(6):2155–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01124-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Probstfield JL, Moinpour CM, Coltman CA. Erectile dysfunction and subsequent cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2005;294(23):2996–3002. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.23.2996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiurlia E, D’Amico R, Ratti C, Granata AR, Romagnoli R, Modena MG. Subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis in patients with erectile dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1503–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. • Fan J, Peng T, Hui J, Ding W, He B, Zhang H, et al. Erectile dysfunction in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: predictors of early detection and treatment. Urol Int. 2021;105(11–12):986–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514700. The prevalence of ED in patients with history of DM is high; this paper reviews risk factors and comorbidities that sexual-medicine clinicians should be aware of while treating the diabetic population.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Francis SH, Corbin JD. PDE5 inhibitors: targeting erectile dysfunction in diabetics. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011;11(6):683–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2011.08.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sayadi M, Elmafshar R, Razeghian-Jahromi I, Zibaeenezhad MJ. Detection of coronary artery disease by an erectile dysfunction questionnaire. Cardiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:6647995. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6647995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. •• Varela CG, Yeguas LAM, Rodriguez IC, Vila MDD. Penile Doppler ultrasound for erectile dysfunction: technique and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(5):1112–21. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22141. This review provides excellent details on the role of penile Doppler sonography in the assessment of ED. The study is complete with tables and figures regarding this diagnostic modality.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Aversa A, Crafa A, Greco EA, Chiefari E, Brunetti A, La Vignera S. The penile duplex ultrasound: how and when to perform it? Andrology. 2021;9(5):1457–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13029. This useful review is complete with Doppler ultrasound images, to better explain the utility of penile ultrasound in the setting of men's sexual health clinics.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaba R. Venous leak and erectile dysfunction – an important differential. J Clin Urol. 2020;13(1):33–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415819847318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mutnuru PC, Ramanjaneyulu HK, Susarla R, Yarlagadda J, Devraj R, Palanisamy P. Pharmaco penile duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(1):TC07–TC10. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25092.9270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bilgutay AN, Pastuszak AW. Peyronie’s disease: a review of etiology, diagnosis, and management. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2015;7(2):117–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-015-0045-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nehra A, Alterowitz R, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, Heidelbaugh JJ, et al. Peyronie’s disease: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2015;194(3):745–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ultrasound Documentation Requirements. American Urological Association. https://www.auanet.org//membership/publications-overview/auanews/all-articles/ultrasound-documentation-requirements. Accessed 3 Sept 2022. 

  33. Local Coverage Determination (LCD). Non-invasive vascular studies. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). 2021. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?lcdid=34045&ver=29&bc=CAAAAAAAAAAA.  Accessed 3 Sept 2022.

  34. Beilan J. 054 still doomed to impotence: an updated analysis of erectile dysfunction (ED) and inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insurance coverage from verification benefits databases. J Sex Med. 2019;16(4):Supplement 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.066.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA

    Kareem Elgendi

  2. Advanced Urology Institute, Largo, FL, USA

    Nicholas Zulia & Jonathan Beilan

Authors
  1. Kareem Elgendi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas Zulia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan Beilan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Beilan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

KE and NZ have no conflicts of interest to report. JB is a paid consultant to Boston Scientific Corporation, menMD, In., and Bastion Health. The authors received no financial benefit from the planning, implementation, writing, peer review, editing, and publication of this scientific work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Men’s Health

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elgendi, K., Zulia, N. & Beilan, J. A Review on Penile Doppler and Ultrasonography for Erectile Dysfunction. Curr Urol Rep 24, 69–74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01135-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01135-4

Keywords

search

Navigation