Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1051–6.
Keune JD, Brunsvold ME, Hohmann E, Korndorffer JR Jr, Weinstein DF, Smink DS. The ethics of conducting graduate medical education research on residents. Acad Med. 2013;88:449–53.
Thomas NK. Resident burnout. JAMA. 2004;292:2880–9.
• Abramson EL, Paul CR, Petershack J, Serwint J, Fischel JE, Rocha M, et al. Conducting quantitative medical education research: from design to dissemination. Acad Pediatr. 2018;18:129–39 This article provides a comprehensive strategy from design to dissemination of research in medical education. The detailed tables provide useful examples that can be applied to one’s own projects.
Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41:737–45.
Meyer HS, Durning SJ, Sklar DP, Maggio LA. Making the first cut: an analysis of academic medicine editors’ reasons for not sending manuscripts out for external peer review. Acad Med. 2018;93:464–70.
Sullivan GM. Getting off the “gold standard”: randomized controlled trials and education research. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3:285–9.
Blanchard RD, Visintainer PF, La Rochelle J. Cultivating medical education research mentorship as a pathway towards high quality medical education research. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1359–62.
Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. BEME guide no. 1: best evidence medical education. Med Teach. 1999;21:553–62.
Human subjects research protections: enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary. 45 CFR Parts 46, 160, and 164 Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Parts 50 and 56, 2011, 76. Accessed 24 March 2020. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2011-07-26/pdf/2011-18792.pdf
Federal Register. Protection of human subjects. 45CFR46.101b. , 2005, 2020. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title45-vol1/pdf/CFR-2016-title45-vol1-part46.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2020.
Yeh HC, Bertram A, Brancati FL, Cofrancesco J Jr. Perceptions of division directors in general internal medicine about the importance of and support for scholarly work done by clinician-educators. Acad Med. 2015;90:203–8.
• Bileau E, Patenaude J, St-Onge C. Twelve tips to avoid ethical pitfalls when recruiting students as subjects in medical education research. Med Teach. 2018;40:20–5 This is a practical guide to understanding the potential ethical pitfalls and how to avoid them in medical student research but very applicable to GME research.
Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Mechaber AJ, Eacker A, Harper W, Massie FS Jr, et al. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions. Acad Med. 2007;82:654–60.
Levinson W, Rubenstein A. Integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers: challenges and potential solutions. Acad Med. 2000;75:906–12.
Nelson D. Expanding philanthropic opportunities for medical education research. Med Educ. 2017;51:460–2.
• Chen W, Reeves TC: Twelve tips for conducting educational design research in medical education. Med Teach 2019:1–7. This article complements the Abramson article presenting a systematic approach to designing and completing MER. Despite being specifically directed to education design, many of the tips can be generalized to any type of research.