Advertisement

Surgical Management of Fossa Navicularis and Distal Urethral Strictures

  • Michael Daneshvar
  • Michael Hughes
  • Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Surgery (J Simhan, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Surgery

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Urethral reconstruction has evolved in the last several decades with the introduction of various techniques including fasciocutaneous skin flaps and buccal mucosal grafts. However, distal urethral strictures have continued to be a reconstructive challenge due to tendency for adverse cosmetic outcomes, risks of glans dehiscence or fistula formation, and stricture recurrence.

Recent Findings

The surgical options for treatment of distal urethral strictures have changed throughout the years; however, there is no one universally accepted technique for their treatment. The current trend for treatment is shifting away from multi-staged procedures or the use of local skin flaps to single-stage transurethral procedures that utilize buccal mucosa with glans preservation.

Summary

This chapter will describe the evolution of distal urethral stricture treatments tracking gradual improvements and modifications over time. The different interventions include transurethral approaches, such as dilations and visual urethrotomy, meatotomy, and meatoplasty/urethroplasty techniques including genital skin flaps and single- and double-stage repairs with buccal mucosal grafts.

Keywords

Urethral reconstruction Fossa navicularis stricture Distal urethral stricture Buccal mucosal graft Tissue flap Balanitis xerotica obliterans 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Michael Daneshvar, Michael Hughes, and Dmitriy Nikolavsky each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Chowdhury PS, Nayak P, Mallick S, Gurumurthy S, David D, Mossadeq A. Single stage ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for navicular fossa strictures. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(1):17–22.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.124200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fenton AS, Morey AF, Aviles R, Garcia CR. Anterior urethral strictures: etiology and characteristics. Urology. 2005;65(6):1055–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stein MJ, DeSouza RA. Anterior urethral stricture review. Transl Androl Urol. 2013;2(1):32–8.  https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2012.11.05. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh SK, Agrawal SK, Mavuduru RS. Management of the stricture of fossa navicularis and pendulous urethral strictures. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(3):371–7.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85442.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeller S, Vetterlein MW, Fisch M, Kluth LA. Meatal and glandular urethral strictures. Urologe A. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0555-5.
  6. 6.
    Blandy JP, Tresidder GC. Meatoplasty. Br J Urol. 1967;39(5):633–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mertziotis N, Kozyrakis D, Kyratsas C, Konandreas AA. Prospective study of bipolar transurethral resection of prostate comparing the efficiency and safety of the method in large and small adenomas. Adv Urol. 2015;2015:251879.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/251879.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunes M, Keles MO, Kaya C, Koca O, Sertkaya Z, Akyuz M, et al. Does resectoscope size play a role in formation of urethral stricture following transurethral prostate resection? Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(4):744–9.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0093.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qu L, Wang X, Huang X, Zhang Y, Zeng X. The hemostatic properties of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate: comparison with conventional resectoscope in an ex vivo study. Urol Int. 2008;80(3):292–5.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000127344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wendt-Nordahl G, Hacker A, Fastenmeier K, Knoll T, Reich O, Alken P, et al. New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation. J Endourol/ Endourol Soc. 2005;19(10):1203–9.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol. 1998;81(5):735–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas RH, Ridley CM, Black MM. The association between lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and autoimmune disease in males—an addendum. Br J Dermatol. 1984;111(3):371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Depasquale I, Park AJ, Bracka A. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int. 2000;86(4):459–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hampson LA, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Male urethral strictures and their management. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11(1):43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Veeratterapillay R, Pickard RS. Long-term effect of urethral dilatation and internal urethrotomy for urethral strictures. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22(6):467–73.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835621a2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2011;107(1):6–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sachse H. Cystoscopic transurethral incision of urethral stricture with a sharp instrument (author’s transl). MMW Munch Med Wochenschr. 1974;116(49):2147–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sachse H. Treatment of urethral stricture: transurethral slit in view using sharp section. Fortschr Med. 1974;92(1):12–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith P, Dunn M, Dounis A. Sachse optical urethrotome in management of urethral stricture in the male: preliminary communication. J R Soc Med. 1978;71(8):596–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith PJ, Dunn M, Dounis A. The early results of treatment of stricture of the male urethra using the Sachse optical urethrotome. Br J Urol. 1979;51(3):224–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Armenakas NA, Morey AF, McAninch JW. Reconstruction of resistant strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus. J Urol. 1998;160(2):359–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jin T, Li H, Jiang LH, Wang L, Wang KJ. Safety and efficacy of laser and cold knife urethrotomy for urethral stricture. Chin Med J. 2010;123(12):1589–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kluth LA, Ernst L, Vetterlein MW, Meyer CP, Reiss CP, Fisch M, et al. Direct vision internal urethrotomy for short anterior urethral strictures and beyond: success rates, predictors of treatment failure, and recurrence management. Urology. 2017;106:210–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dubey D. The current role of direct vision internal urethrotomy and self-catheterization for anterior urethral strictures. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(3):392–6.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.85445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Santucci R, Eisenberg L. Urethrotomy has a much lower success rate than previously reported. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1859–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Steenkamp JW, Heyns CF, de Kock ML. Outpatient treatment for male urethral strictures—dilatation versus internal urethrotomy. S Afr J Surg. 1997;35(3):125–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Steenkamp JW, Heyns CF, de Kock ML. Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol. 1997;157(1):98–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al. Male urethral stricture: American urological association guideline. J Urol. 2017;197(1):182–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malone P. A new technique for meatal stenosis in patients with lichen sclerosus. J Urol. 2004;172(3):949–52.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000134781.43470.5f.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meeks JJ, Barbagli G, Mehdiratta N, Granieri MA, Gonzalez CM. Distal urethroplasty for isolated fossa navicularis and meatal strictures. BJU Int. 2012;109(4):616–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morey AF, Lin HC, DeRosa CA, Griffith BC. Fossa navicularis reconstruction: impact of stricture length on outcomes and assessment of extended meatotomy (first stage Johanson) maneuver. J Urol. 2007;177(1):184–7; discussion 7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.062.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nikolavsky D, Abouelleil M, Daneshvar M. Transurethral ventral buccal mucosa graft inlay urethroplasty for reconstruction of fossa navicularis and distal urethral strictures: surgical technique and preliminary results. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(11):1823–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1381-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    • Armenakas NA, McAninch JW. Management of fossa navicularis strictures. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29(2):477–84. First paper to propose the preservation of the glans during distal urethral reconstruction in order to prevent dehisence of the tissue. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jordan GH. Reconstruction of the fossa navicularis. J Urol. 1987;138(1):102–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    • Onol SY, Onol FF, Gumus E, Topaktas R, Erdem MR. Reconstruction of distal urethral strictures confined to the glans with circular buccal mucosa graft. Urology. 2012;79(5):1158–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.046. First reconstructive technique that describes a transmeatal approach to urethroplasty without the inclusion of genital skin. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cohney BC. A penile flap procedure for the relief of meatal stricture. Br J Urol. 1963;35:182–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brannen GE. Meatal reconstruction. J Urol. 1976;116(3):319–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    De Sy WA, Oosterlinck W, Verbaeys A. European experience with 1-stage urethroplasty with free full thickness skin graft. J Urol. 1981;125(4):502–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    •• Virasoro R, Eltahawy EA, Jordan GH. Long-term follow-up for reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis with a single technique. BJU Int. 2007;100(5):1143–5.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07078.x. Long-term follow up of Jordan's initial technique for the treatment of FNS. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goel A, Goel A, Dalela D, Sankhwar SN. Meatoplasty using double buccal mucosal graft technique. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(4):885–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9555-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gelman J, Sohn W. 1-stage repair of obliterative distal urethral strictures with buccal graft urethral plate reconstruction and simultaneous onlay penile skin flap. J Urol. 2011;186(3):935–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    • Naude JH. Endoscopic skin-graft urethroplasty. World J Urol. 1998;16(3):171–4. Largest study of the treatment of FNS endoscopically without the use of skin incision or ventral urethrotomy. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Daneshvar
    • 1
  • Michael Hughes
    • 1
  • Dmitriy Nikolavsky
    • 1
  1. 1.SUNY Upstate Medical UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations